These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34113264)
1. Heart Rate Variability and Clinical Features as Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation: A Pilot Study. Saiz-Vivo J; Corino VDA; Hatala R; de Melis M; Mainardi LT Front Physiol; 2021; 12():672896. PubMed ID: 34113264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of an implantable monitor to detect arrhythmia recurrences and select patients for early repeat catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a pilot study. Pokushalov E; Romanov A; Corbucci G; Artyomenko S; Turov A; Shirokova N; Karaskov A Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2011 Dec; 4(6):823-31. PubMed ID: 21930653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Insertable cardiac monitor-guided early intervention to reduce atrial fibrillation burden following catheter ablation: Study design and clinical protocol (ICM-REDUCE-AF trial). Tankut SS; Huang DT; Zareba W; Aktas MK; Rosero SZ; Steinberg J; Henchen J; Kutyifa V; Strawderman RL; Goldenberg I Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2023 Mar; 28(2):e13043. PubMed ID: 36718801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unsupervised Classification of Atrial Fibrillation Triggers Using Heart Rate Variability Features Extracted from Implantable Cardiac Monitor Data. Saiz-Vivo J; DA Corino V; de Melis M; Mainardi LT Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():426-429. PubMed ID: 33018019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of atrial fibrillation detection by an insertable cardiac monitor in patients undergoing catheter ablation: Results of the BioVAD study. Assaf A; Theuns DAMJ; Sakhi R; Bhagwandien RE; Szili-Torok T; Yap SC Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2022 May; 27(3):e12960. PubMed ID: 35481956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Discerning the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic episodes of atrial fibrillation before and after catheter ablation (DISCERN AF): a prospective, multicenter study. Verma A; Champagne J; Sapp J; Essebag V; Novak P; Skanes A; Morillo CA; Khaykin Y; Birnie D JAMA Intern Med; 2013 Jan; 173(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 23266597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term changes in heart rate variability after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: 1-year follow-up study with irrigation tip catheter. Kang KW; Kim TH; Park J; Uhm JS; Joung B; Hwang C; Lee MH; Pak HN J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Jul; 25(7):693-700. PubMed ID: 24575794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Usefulness of serum uric acid level to predict atrial fibrillation recurrence after cryoballoon-based catheter ablation. Canpolat U; Aytemir K; Yorgun H; Şahiner L; Kaya EB; Çay S; Topaloğlu S; Aras D; Oto A Europace; 2014 Dec; 16(12):1731-7. PubMed ID: 25355778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Cluster Analysis and Ablation Success Rate in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation]. Huang F; Zhong Y; Zhang R; Bai W; Li Y; Gong S; Chen S; Zhu T; Chen Y; Rao L Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2024 May; 55(3):687-692. PubMed ID: 38948279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Continuous monitoring after atrial fibrillation ablation: the LINQ AF study. Wechselberger S; Kronborg M; Huo Y; Piorkowski J; Neudeck S; Päßler E; El-Armouche A; Richter U; Mayer J; Ulbrich S; Pu L; Kirstein B; Gaspar T; Piorkowski C Europace; 2018 Nov; 20(FI_3):f312-f320. PubMed ID: 29688326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of Monitoring Strategy on Assessment of Ablation Success and Postablation Atrial Fibrillation Burden Assessment: Implications for Practice and Clinical Trial Design. Aguilar M; Macle L; Deyell MW; Yao R; Hawkins NM; Khairy P; Andrade JG Circulation; 2022 Jan; 145(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 34816727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic value of heart rate variability in atrial fibrillation recurrence following catheter ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Zhang E; Liang S; Sun T; Xu J; Lu F; Wu D; Zhang J; He L; Zhang F; Fan S; Ma W Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():1048398. PubMed ID: 36818913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Atrial Fibrillation Complexity Parameters Derived From Surface ECGs Predict Procedural Outcome and Long-Term Follow-Up of Stepwise Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation. Lankveld T; Zeemering S; Scherr D; Kuklik P; Hoffmann BA; Willems S; Pieske B; Haïssaguerre M; Jaïs P; Crijns HJ; Schotten U Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2016 Feb; 9(2):e003354. PubMed ID: 26823480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation burden before and after pulmonary veins isolation: an observational study through a subcutaneous leadless cardiac monitor. Pedrote A; Arana-Rueda E; García-Riesco L; Sánchez-Brotons J; Durán-Guerrero M; Gómez-Pulido F; Arce-León A; Frutos-López M J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1075-82. PubMed ID: 23790041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of atrial fibrillation recurrences during the blanking period following catheter ablation on long-term arrhythmia-free survival: a prospective study with continuous monitoring. Amankwah NA; Pothineni NVK; Guandalini G; Santangeli P; Schaller R; Supple GE; Deo R; Nazarian S; Lin D; Epstein AE; Dixit S; Callans DJ; Marchlinski FE; Frankel DS J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2022 Nov; 65(2):519-525. PubMed ID: 35794440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term comparisons of atrial fibrillation ablation outcomes with a cryoballoon or laser-balloon: A propensity-matched analysis based on continuous rhythm monitoring. Schiavone M; Gasperetti A; Montemerlo E; Pozzi M; Sabato F; Piazzi E; Ruggiero D; De Ceglia S; Viecca M; Calkins H; Rovaris G; Forleo GB Hellenic J Cardiol; 2022; 65():1-7. PubMed ID: 35331905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting long-term freedom from atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation by a machine learning algorithm: Validation of the CAAP-AF score. Furui K; Morishima I; Morita Y; Kanzaki Y; Takagi K; Yoshida R; Nagai H; Watanabe N; Yoshioka N; Yamauchi R; Tsuboi H; Murohara T J Arrhythm; 2020 Apr; 36(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 32256878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term single- and multiple-procedure outcome and predictors of success after catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. Rostock T; Salukhe TV; Steven D; Drewitz I; Hoffmann BA; Bock K; Servatius H; Müllerleile K; Sultan A; Gosau N; Meinertz T; Wegscheider K; Willems S Heart Rhythm; 2011 Sep; 8(9):1391-7. PubMed ID: 21699825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term efficacy and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices and transvenous leads. Dinshaw L; Schäffer B; Akbulak Ö; Jularic M; Hartmann J; Klatt N; Dickow J; Gunawardene M; Münkler P; Hakmi S; Pecha S; Sultan A; Lüker J; Pinnschmidt H; Hoffmann B; Gosau N; Eickholt C; Willems S; Steven D; Meyer C J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 May; 30(5):679-687. PubMed ID: 30821012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anticoagulation after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation guided by implantable cardiac monitors. Zuern CS; Kilias A; Berlitz P; Seizer P; Gramlich M; Müller K; Duckheim M; Gawaz M; Schreieck J Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Jun; 38(6):688-93. PubMed ID: 25753968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]