170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34113624)
1. Maternal Variables as Determinant of Fetal Growth: Study Protocol on Customized Fetal Growth Charts in Malaysia (GROW-My).
Za'im Sahul Hameed M; Sutan R; Mahdy ZA; Tamil AM; Sulong S
Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():592462. PubMed ID: 34113624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive accuracy of Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) chorionicity-specific twin growth charts for stillbirth: a validation study.
Kalafat E; Sebghati M; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 53(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 29660172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of ethnicity on adverse perinatal outcome in women with chronic hypertension: a cohort study.
Webster LM; Bramham K; Seed PT; Homsy M; Widdows K; Webb AJ; Nelson-Piercy C; Magee L; Thilaganathan B; Myers JE; Chappell LC
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 54(1):72-78. PubMed ID: 30318830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new customized fetal growth standard for African American women: the PRB/NICHD Detroit study.
Tarca AL; Romero R; Gudicha DW; Erez O; Hernandez-Andrade E; Yeo L; Bhatti G; Pacora P; Maymon E; Hassan SS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S679-S691.e4. PubMed ID: 29422207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Customized vs INTERGROWTH-21
Francis A; Hugh O; Gardosi J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S692-S699. PubMed ID: 29422208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Customized growth charts: rationale, validation and clinical benefits.
Gardosi J; Francis A; Turner S; Williams M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S609-S618. PubMed ID: 29422203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study.
Pritchard NL; Hiscock RJ; Lockie E; Permezel M; McGauren MFG; Kennedy AL; Green B; Walker SP; Lindquist AC
PLoS Med; 2019 Oct; 16(10):e1002923. PubMed ID: 31584941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Customized and non-customized live-born birth-weight curves of single and uncomplicated pregnancies from the Burgundy perinatal network. Part I - methodology.
Rousseau T; Durand-Maison O; Labruere-Chazal C; Tabard F; Jebrane A; Martz O; Benzenine E; Cottenet J; Sagot P
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Sep; 46(7):587-590. PubMed ID: 28529058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of individual antenatal tools for prediction of small-for-gestational age at birth.
Poljak B; Agarwal U; Jackson R; Alfirevic Z; Sharp A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 49(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 27486031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Controlled trial of fundal height measurement plotted on customised antenatal growth charts.
Gardosi J; Francis A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Apr; 106(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 10426236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. INTERGROWTH-21st compared with GROW customized centiles in the detection of adverse perinatal outcomes at term.
Pritchard N; Lindquist A; Siqueira IDA; Walker SP; Permezel M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Mar; 33(6):961-966. PubMed ID: 30372647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Customized GROW vs INTERGROWTH-21
Fay E; Hugh O; Francis A; Katz R; Sitcov K; Souter V; Gardosi J
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Mar; 4(2):100545. PubMed ID: 34875415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Testing the assumptions of customized intrauterine growth charts using national birth studies.
Hocquette A; Monier I; Blondel B; Dufourg MN; Heude B; Zeitlin J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Apr; 101(4):405-416. PubMed ID: 35224718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of fetal growth by customized growth charts.
Gaillard R; Jaddoe VW
Ann Nutr Metab; 2014; 65(2-3):149-55. PubMed ID: 25413653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unisex vs sex-specific estimated fetal weight charts for fetal growth monitoring: a population-based study.
Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Hocquette A; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Jan; 4(1):100527. PubMed ID: 34763120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Customized birth-weight centiles and placenta-related fetal growth restriction.
Melamed N; Hiersch L; Aviram A; Keating S; Kingdom JC
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 57(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 33073889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of intrauterine fetal death in small-for-gestational-age fetuses: impact of including ultrasound biometry in customized models.
Odibo AO; Cahill AG; Odibo L; Roehl K; Macones GA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 39(3):288-92. PubMed ID: 21538642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Customized growth charts for twin gestations to optimize identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses at risk of intrauterine fetal death.
Odibo AO; Cahill AG; Goetzinger KR; Harper LM; Tuuli MG; Macones GA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 41(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 23334992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Association of Maternal Height With Mode of Delivery and Fetal Birth Weight at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Softa SM; Aldardeir N; Aloufi FS; Alshihabi SS; Khouj M; Radwan E
Cureus; 2022 Jul; 14(7):e27493. PubMed ID: 36060402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of customization and use of a fetal growth standard on the association between birthweight percentile and adverse perinatal outcome.
Sovio U; Smith GCS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S738-S744. PubMed ID: 29199029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
