These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34113862)

  • 21. Improved patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy by normalization of QRS duration to left ventricular dimension.
    Zweerink A; Wu L; de Roest GJ; Nijveldt R; de Cock CC; van Rossum AC; Allaart CP
    Europace; 2017 Sep; 19(9):1508-1513. PubMed ID: 27707784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dynamic programming of atrioventricular delay improves electrical synchrony in a multicenter cardiac resynchronization therapy study.
    Thibault B; Ritter P; Bode K; Calò L; Mondésert B; Mangual JO; Badie N; McSpadden LC; Pappone C; Varma N
    Heart Rhythm; 2019 Jul; 16(7):1047-1056. PubMed ID: 30682433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Size Matters: Normalization of QRS Duration to Left Ventricular Dimension Improves Prediction of Long-Term Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Outcome.
    Zweerink A; Friedman DJ; Klem I; van de Ven PM; Vink C; Biesbroek PS; Hansen SM; Emerek K; Kim RJ; van Rossum AC; Atwater BD; Nijveldt R; Allaart CP
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2018 Dec; 11(12):e006767. PubMed ID: 30541355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of paced left ventricular dyssynchrony on left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Gauthey A; Willemen E; Lumens J; Ploux S; Bordachar P; Ritter P; Prinzen FW; Lejeune S; Pouleur AC; Garnir Q; Marchandise S; Scavée C; Wauters A; le Polain de Waroux JB
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Feb; 31(2):494-502. PubMed ID: 31908084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. ECG parameters predict left ventricular conduction delay in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
    Pastore G; Maines M; Marcantoni L; Zanon F; Noventa F; Corbucci G; Baracca E; Aggio S; Picariello C; Lanza D; Rigatelli G; Carraro M; Roncon L; Barold SS
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 Dec; 13(12):2289-2296. PubMed ID: 27424074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biventricular pacemaker upgrade in previously paced heart failure patients--improvements in ventricular dyssynchrony.
    Witte KK; Pipes RR; Nanthakumar K; Parker JD
    J Card Fail; 2006 Apr; 12(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 16624685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Electrocardiographic imaging of patients with heart failure with left bundle branch block and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Varma N; Jia P; Rudy Y
    J Electrocardiol; 2007; 40(6 Suppl):S174-8. PubMed ID: 17993318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Vectorcardiography as a tool for easy optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy in canine left bundle branch block hearts.
    van Deursen CJ; Strik M; Rademakers LM; van Hunnik A; Kuiper M; Wecke L; Crijns HJ; Vernooy K; Prinzen FW
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2012 Jun; 5(3):544-52. PubMed ID: 22534251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sex-Specific Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Effect of Left Ventricular Size and QRS Duration in Left Bundle Branch Block.
    Varma N; Lappe J; He J; Niebauer M; Manne M; Tchou P
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Aug; 3(8):844-853. PubMed ID: 29759781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interrelationships between interventricular electrical delays in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Moubarak G; Sebag FA; Socie P; Villejoubert O; Louembe J; Ferchaud V
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Sep; 31(9):2405-2414. PubMed ID: 32562444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Scar burden, not intraventricular conduction delay pattern, is associated with outcomes in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Adelstein EC; Althouse AD; Schwartzman D; Jain SK; Soman P; Saba S
    Heart Rhythm; 2018 Nov; 15(11):1664-1672. PubMed ID: 29852239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison between conduction system pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy in right bundle branch block patients.
    Strocchi M; Gillette K; Neic A; Elliott MK; Wijesuriya N; Mehta V; Vigmond EJ; Plank G; Rinaldi CA; Niederer SA
    Front Physiol; 2022; 13():1011566. PubMed ID: 36213223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Left ventricular conduction delays and relation to QRS configuration in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
    Varma N
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Jun; 103(11):1578-85. PubMed ID: 19463519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Left ventricular electromechanical delay in patients with heart failure and normal QRS duration and in patients with right and left bundle branch block.
    Badano LP; Gaddi O; Peraldo C; Lupi G; Sitges M; Parthenakis F; Molteni S; Pagliuca MR; Sassone B; Di Stefano P; De Santo T; Menozzi C; Brignole M
    Europace; 2007 Jan; 9(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 17224421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Electrical wavefront fusion in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block and cardiac resynchronization therapy: Implications for optimization.
    Bank AJ; Gage RM; Schaefer AE; Burns KV; Brown CD
    J Electrocardiol; 2020; 61():47-56. PubMed ID: 32526538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detailed analysis of ventricular activation sequences during right ventricular apical pacing and left bundle branch block and the potential implications for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Eschalier R; Ploux S; Lumens J; Whinnett Z; Varma N; Meillet V; Ritter P; Jaïs P; Haïssaguerre M; Bordachar P
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Jan; 12(1):137-43. PubMed ID: 25285646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intracardiac conduction time as a predictor of cardiac resynchronization therapy response: Results of the BIO|SELECT pilot study.
    Soejima K; Kondo Y; Sasaki S; Adachi K; Kato R; Hagiwara N; Harada T; Kusano K; Miura F; Morishima I; Yoshitani K; Yotsukura A; Fujimoto M; Nishii N; Shimeno K; Ohe M; Tasaka H; Sasaki H; Schrader J; Ando K
    Heart Rhythm O2; 2021 Dec; 2(6Part A):588-596. PubMed ID: 34988503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Noninvasive electrocardiographic mapping to improve patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy: beyond QRS duration and left bundle branch block morphology.
    Ploux S; Lumens J; Whinnett Z; Montaudon M; Strom M; Ramanathan C; Derval N; Zemmoura A; Denis A; De Guillebon M; Shah A; Hocini M; Jaïs P; Ritter P; Haïssaguerre M; Wilkoff BL; Bordachar P
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Jun; 61(24):2435-2443. PubMed ID: 23602768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy is determined by intrinsic electrical substrate rather than by its modification.
    Strik M; Ploux S; Huntjens PR; Nguyên UC; Frontera A; Eschalier R; Dubois R; Ritter P; Klotz N; Vernooy K; Haïssaguerre M; Crijns HJGM; Prinzen FW; Bordachar P
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 Nov; 270():143-148. PubMed ID: 29895424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Probability and magnitude of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy according to QRS duration and gender in nonischemic cardiomyopathy and LBBB.
    Varma N; Manne M; Nguyen D; He J; Niebauer M; Tchou P
    Heart Rhythm; 2014 Jul; 11(7):1139-47. PubMed ID: 24704570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.