These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34114367)

  • 21. [Geometrical modeling of the spine and the thorax for the biomechanical analysis of scoliotic deformities using the finite element method].
    Aubin CE; Descrimes JL; Dansereau J; Skalli W; Lavaste F; Labelle H
    Ann Chir; 1995; 49(8):749-61. PubMed ID: 8561431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Finite element simulation of a scoliotic spine with periodic adjustments of an attached growing rod.
    Abolaeha OA; Weber J; Ross LT
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():5781-5. PubMed ID: 23367243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A biomechanical study of the Charleston brace for the treatment of scoliosis.
    Clin J; Aubin CE; Parent S; Labelle H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E940-7. PubMed ID: 20431434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Stress distribution changes in growth plates of a trunk with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following unilateral muscle paralysis: A hybrid musculoskeletal and finite element model.
    Kamal Z; Rouhi G
    J Biomech; 2020 Oct; 111():109997. PubMed ID: 32866916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Finite element comparison of different growth sparring instrumentation systems for the early treatment of idiopathic scoliosis.
    Driscoll M; Aubin CE; Moreau A; Parent S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 158():89-94. PubMed ID: 20543406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biomechanical modeling of posterior instrumentation of the scoliotic spine.
    Aubin CE; Petit Y; Stokes IA; Poulin F; Gardner-Morse M; Labelle H
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003 Feb; 6(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 12623435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [A study of biomechanical coupling between spine and rib cage in the treatment by orthosis of scoliosis].
    Aubin CE; Dansereau J; De Guise JA; Labelle H
    Ann Chir; 1996; 50(8):641-50. PubMed ID: 9035438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sagittal curvature of the spine as a predictor of the pediatric spinal deformity development.
    Pasha S; de Reuver S; Homans JF; Castelein RM
    Spine Deform; 2021 Jul; 9(4):923-932. PubMed ID: 33449344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biomechanical modelling of spinal growth modulation for the study of adolescent scoliotic deformities: a feasibility study.
    Villemure I; Aubin CE; Dansereau J; Labelle H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 88():373-7. PubMed ID: 15456064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. 3D Deformation Patterns of S Shaped Elastic Rods as a Pathogenesis Model for Spinal Deformity in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
    Pasha S
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16485. PubMed ID: 31712762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Fast 3D model reconstruction of scoliotic spine using two X-ray images].
    Zeng X; Zhou H; Wang C; Chen G
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Feb; 30(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 23488138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A mathematical expression of three-dimensional configuration of the scoliotic spine.
    Kanayama M; Tadano S; Kaneda K; Ukai T; Abumi K
    J Biomech Eng; 1996 May; 118(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 8738791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Personalised mechanical properties of scoliotic vertebrae determined in vivo using tomodensitometry.
    Périé D; Hobatho MC; Baunin C; Sales De Gauzy J
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2002 Apr; 5(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 12186725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stability of the Scoliotic Spine: Effect of Scoliosis Braces.
    Havey RM; Gavin TM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 7():S18-9. PubMed ID: 26780611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sagittal spinal profile and spinopelvic balance in parents of scoliotic children.
    Janssen MM; Vincken KL; van Raak SM; Vrtovec T; Kemp B; Viergever MA; Bartels LW; Castelein RM
    Spine J; 2013 Dec; 13(12):1789-800. PubMed ID: 23819971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Scoliosis study using finite element models.
    Aubin CE
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():309-13. PubMed ID: 15457744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of idiopathic scoliosis progression by using numerical simulation.
    Drevelle X; Lafon Y; Ebermeyer E; Courtois I; Dubousset J; Skalli W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(10):E407-12. PubMed ID: 20393388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tomodensitometry measurements for in vivo quantification of mechanical properties of scoliotic vertebrae.
    Périé D; Sales De Gauzy J; Baunin C; Hobatho MC
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001 Jun; 16(5):373-9. PubMed ID: 11390043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of the efficiency of various force configurations on scoliotic, lordotic and kyphotic curves in the subjects with scoliosis.
    Karimi MT; Rabczuk T; Pourabbas B
    Spine Deform; 2020 Jun; 8(3):361-367. PubMed ID: 32065381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A multibody-based approach to the computation of spine intervertebral motions in scoliotic patients.
    Abedrabbo G; Fisette P; Absil PA; Mahaudens P; Detrembleur C; Raison M; Banse X; Aubin CE; Mousny M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 176():95-8. PubMed ID: 22744467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.