These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34115062)
1. Occlusal Thickness and Cement-Type Effects on Fracture Resistance of Implant-Supported Posterior Monolithic Zirconia Crowns. Bulut AC; Atsü SS Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(3):485-491. PubMed ID: 34115062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of occlusal groove on abutment, crown thickness, and cement-type on fracture load of monolithic zirconia crowns. Tsuyuki Y; Sato T; Nomoto S; Yotsuya M; Koshihara T; Takemoto S; Yoshinari M Dent Mater J; 2018 Sep; 37(5):843-850. PubMed ID: 29962415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading. Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro analysis of the fracture resistance of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia molar crowns with different occlusal thickness. Sorrentino R; Triulzio C; Tricarico MG; Bonadeo G; Gherlone EF; Ferrari M J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():328-333. PubMed ID: 27104931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture strength of implant-supported monolithic crowns after aging in a mastication simulator. Şalvarlı KC; Talay Çevlik E Int J Esthet Dent; 2023 Feb; 18(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 36734424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Endodontic Access Preparation on Fracture Load of Translucent versus Conventional Zirconia Crowns with Varying Occlusal Thicknesses. Nejat AH; Dupree P; Kee E; Xu X; Zakkour W; Odom M; Bruggers K; Mascarenhas F J Prosthodont; 2021 Oct; 30(8):706-710. PubMed ID: 33484219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of Vent Hole and Cement Type on Fracture Resistance of CAD-CAM Monolithic Zirconia Crowns. Talay Çevlik E; Alkan Demetoğlu G; Yıldız P J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):411-416. PubMed ID: 35752941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of cement type and ceramic primer on retention of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns to a one-piece zirconia implant. Rohr N; Brunner S; Märtin S; Fischer J J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):138-145. PubMed ID: 28461047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Surface Treatment and Cement on Fracture Load of Traditional Zirconia (3Y), Translucent Zirconia (5Y), and Lithium Disilicate Crowns. Lawson NC; Jurado CA; Huang CT; Morris GP; Burgess JO; Liu PR; Kinderknecht KE; Lin CP; Givan DA J Prosthodont; 2019 Jul; 28(6):659-665. PubMed ID: 31145492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the fracture resistance of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing monolithic crowns prepared in different cement thicknesses. Sagsoz NP; Yanıkoglu N Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Apr; 21(4):417-422. PubMed ID: 29607851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Crowns on Titanium Implant Abutments. Weyhrauch M; Igiel C; Scheller H; Weibrich G; Lehmann KM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 27004277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of implant abutment angulations on the fracture resistance of overlaying CAM-milled zirconia single crowns. Ellakwa A; Raj T; Deeb S; Ronaghi G; Martin FE; Klineberg I Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 21623803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro damping and strain distribution for implant-supported crowns using 5 different CAD-CAM crowns and 3 different luting cements. Sukkasam C; Kamonkhantikul K; Homsiang W; Arksornnukit M J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; 131(5):916.e1-916.e9. PubMed ID: 38443240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of cyclic loading and luting agents on the fracture load of two all-ceramic crown systems. Attia A; Kern M J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Dec; 92(6):551-6. PubMed ID: 15583561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]