These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34116413)

  • 1. Improving the experience in the pedestrian's interaction with an autonomous vehicle: An ergonomic comparison of external HMI.
    Métayer N; Coeugnet S
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Oct; 96():103478. PubMed ID: 34116413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. External Human-Machine Interfaces on Automated Vehicles: Effects on Pedestrian Crossing Decisions.
    de Clercq K; Dietrich A; Núñez Velasco JP; de Winter J; Happee R
    Hum Factors; 2019 Dec; 61(8):1353-1370. PubMed ID: 30912985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. External Human-Machine Interfaces Can Be Misleading: An Examination of Trust Development and Misuse in a CAVE-Based Pedestrian Simulation Environment.
    Kaleefathullah AA; Merat N; Lee YM; Eisma YB; Madigan R; Garcia J; Winter J
    Hum Factors; 2022 Sep; 64(6):1070-1085. PubMed ID: 33242999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of eHMI Malfunctions on Younger and Elderly Pedestrians' Trust and Acceptance of Automated Vehicle Communication Signals.
    Hensch AC; Kreißig I; Beggiato M; Krems JF
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():866475. PubMed ID: 35592174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deciding when to cross in front of an autonomous vehicle: How child and adult pedestrians respond to eHMI timing and vehicle kinematics.
    Devi Subramanian L; O'Neal EE; Kim NY; Noonan M; Plumert JM; Kearney JK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jul; 202():107567. PubMed ID: 38669901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How should external human-machine interfaces behave? Examining the effects of colour, position, message, activation distance, vehicle yielding, and visual distraction among 1,434 participants.
    Bazilinskyy P; Kooijman L; Dodou D; de Winter JCF
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Sep; 95():103450. PubMed ID: 33971539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding complex traffic road scenes: The case of child-pedestrians' hazard perception.
    Meir A; Oron-Gilad T
    J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():111-126. PubMed ID: 32199554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling pedestrian gap crossing index under mixed traffic condition.
    Naser MM; Zulkiple A; Al Bargi WA; Khalifa NA; Daniel BD
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():91-98. PubMed ID: 29203029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The paradox of pedestrian's risk aversion.
    Hacohen S; Shoval S; Shvalb N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jul; 142():105518. PubMed ID: 32416278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Illegal road crossing behavior of pedestrians at overpass locations: Factors affecting gap acceptance, crossing times and overpass use.
    Demiroz YI; Onelcin P; Alver Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jul; 80():220-8. PubMed ID: 25916663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pedestrian-driver communication and decision strategies at marked crossings.
    Sucha M; Dostal D; Risser R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 May; 102():41-50. PubMed ID: 28259827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of Pedestrian Street-Crossing Decision-Making Based on Vehicle Deceleration-Safety Gap.
    Zhang H; Guo Y; Chen Y; Sun Q; Wang C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 17(24):. PubMed ID: 33321945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pedestrians' perception and response towards vehicles during road-crossing at nighttime.
    Balasubramanian V; Bhardwaj R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():128-135. PubMed ID: 29131980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coupling intention and actions of vehicle-pedestrian interaction: A virtual reality experiment study.
    Dang M; Jin Y; Hang P; Crosato L; Sun Y; Wei C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107639. PubMed ID: 38763064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Harnessing Vehicle-to-Pedestrian (V2P) Communication Technology: Sending Traffic Warnings to Texting Pedestrians.
    Rahimian P; O'Neal EE; Zhou S; Plumert JM; Kearney JK
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):833-843. PubMed ID: 29920115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation of traffic and safety behavior of pedestrians while texting or web-surfing.
    Ropaka M; Nikolaou D; Yannis G
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(6):389-394. PubMed ID: 32500788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pedestrian assessment: Is displaying automated driving mode in self-driving vehicles as relevant as emitting an engine sound in electric vehicles?
    Faas SM; Baumann M
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Jul; 94():103425. PubMed ID: 33865206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pedestrian's risk-based negotiation model for self-driving vehicles to get the right of way.
    Gupta S; Vasardani M; Lohani B; Winter S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():163-173. PubMed ID: 30660067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. eHMI: Review and Guidelines for Deployment on Autonomous Vehicles.
    Carmona J; Guindel C; Garcia F; de la Escalera A
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(9):. PubMed ID: 33919209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual information of vehicle velocity acquired by pedestrians involved in road crossing accidents.
    Yokoya Y; Soma H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 151():105912. PubMed ID: 33352523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.