These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34116965)
1. Use of Rapid Assessment Procedures when analyzing qualitative data in pharmacy research. Renfro CP; Rome Z; Gatwood J; Hohmeier KC Res Social Adm Pharm; 2022 Jan; 18(1):2249-2253. PubMed ID: 34116965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Planning for and Assessing Rigor in Rapid Qualitative Analysis (PARRQA): a consensus-based framework for designing, conducting, and reporting. Kowalski CP; Nevedal AL; Finley EP; Young JP; Lewinski AA; Midboe AM; Hamilton AB Implement Sci; 2024 Oct; 19(1):71. PubMed ID: 39394597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The experience of conducting collaborative and intensive pragmatic qualitative (CLIP-Q) research to support rapid public health and healthcare innovation. Horwood J; Pithara C; Lorenc A; Kesten JM; Murphy M; Turner A; Farr M; Banks J; Redwood S; Lambert H; Donovan JL; Front Sociol; 2022; 7():970333. PubMed ID: 36189441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Establishing trustworthiness and authenticity in qualitative pharmacy research. Amin MEK; Nørgaard LS; Cavaco AM; Witry MJ; Hillman L; Cernasev A; Desselle SP Res Social Adm Pharm; 2020 Oct; 16(10):1472-1482. PubMed ID: 32067887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Seeking to understand: using generic qualitative research to explore access to medicines and pharmacy services among resettled refugees. Bellamy K; Ostini R; Martini N; Kairuz T Int J Clin Pharm; 2016 Jun; 38(3):671-5. PubMed ID: 26873481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Applications of mixed-methods methodology in clinical pharmacy research. Hadi MA; Closs SJ Int J Clin Pharm; 2016 Jun; 38(3):635-40. PubMed ID: 26659085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Participatory action research, mixed methods, and research teams: learning from philosophically juxtaposed methodologies for optimal research outcomes. Sendall MC; McCosker LK; Brodie A; Hill M; Crane P BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):167. PubMed ID: 30541471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation. Carter YH; Shaw S; Macfarlane F Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract; 2002 Feb; (81):iii-vi, 1-72. PubMed ID: 12049028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rapid assessment of clinical information systems in the healthcare setting: an efficient method for time-pressed evaluation. McMullen CK; Ash JS; Sittig DF; Bunce A; Guappone K; Dykstra R; Carpenter J; Richardson J; Wright A Methods Inf Med; 2011; 50(4):299-307. PubMed ID: 21170469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Issues in methodological research: perspectives from researchers and commissioners. Lilford RJ; Richardson A; Stevens A; Fitzpatrick R; Edwards S; Rock F; Hutton JL Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(8):1-57. PubMed ID: 11368832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia. Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Involving decision-makers in the research process: Challenges of implementing the accountability for reasonableness approach to priority setting at the district level in Tanzania. Maluka S; Kamuzora P; Ndawi B; Hurtig AK Glob Public Health; 2014; 9(7):760-72. PubMed ID: 24921238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Framework for Rigorous Qualitative Research as a Component of Mixed Method Rapid-Cycle Evaluation. Skillman M; Cross-Barnet C; Friedman Singer R; Rotondo C; Ruiz S; Moiduddin A Qual Health Res; 2019 Jan; 29(2):279-289. PubMed ID: 30175660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conducting and presenting qualitative research in pharmacy education. Bush AA; Amechi MH Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2019 Jun; 11(6):638-650. PubMed ID: 31213322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ensuring rigour and trustworthiness of qualitative research in clinical pharmacy. Hadi MA; José Closs S Int J Clin Pharm; 2016 Jun; 38(3):641-6. PubMed ID: 26666909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integration in mixed-methods studies: existing practices, considerations and recommendations for pharmacy research. Murry LT; Fadare OO; Al-Khatib A; Witry MJ Int J Pharm Pract; 2023 Jun; 31(4):431-437. PubMed ID: 37348921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar. Hijjeh M; Al Shaikh L; Alinier G; Selwood D; Malmstrom F; Hassan IF Qatar Med J; 2019; 2019(2):2. PubMed ID: 31763205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review. Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]