BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34117128)

  • 1. The Judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court regarding assisted suicide: a template for pluralistic states?
    Wiesing U
    J Med Ethics; 2022 Aug; 48(8):542-546. PubMed ID: 34117128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The right to a self-determined death as expression of the right to freedom of personal development: The German Constitutional Court takes a clear stand on assisted suicide.
    Horn R
    J Med Ethics; 2020 Jun; 46(6):416-417. PubMed ID: 32220872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How dead is the federal constitutional right to assisted suicide?
    Paola FA
    Am J Med; 1998 Jun; 104(6):565-8. PubMed ID: 9674720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physician assisted suicide and the Supreme Court: putting the constitutional claim to rest.
    Mariner WK
    Am J Public Health; 1997 Dec; 87(12):2058-62. PubMed ID: 9431307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Love Them to Death": Dutch and Italian Experiences of (Assisted) Suicide, and the Urgent Need for Human Solidarity.
    Orlandi M
    Issues Law Med; 2020; 35(2):131-171. PubMed ID: 33950599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CONVERTING THE 'RIGHT TO LIFE' TO THE 'RIGHT TO PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE AND EUTHANASIA': AN ANALYSIS OF CARTER V CANADA (ATTORNEY GENERAL), SUPREME COURT OF CANADA.
    Chan B; Somerville M
    Med Law Rev; 2016; 24(2):143-75. PubMed ID: 27099364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Autonomy-Based Approach to Justifying Physician-Assisted Death: A Recent Judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Braun E; Gather J; Scholten M; Vollmann J
    Am J Bioeth; 2022 Feb; 22(2):71-73. PubMed ID: 35089831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assisted suicide: Models of legal regulation in selected European countries and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights.
    Grosse C; Grosse A
    Med Sci Law; 2015 Oct; 55(4):246-58. PubMed ID: 25143341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physician-assisted suicide as a constitutional right.
    Linville JE
    J Law Med Ethics; 1996; 24(3):198-206. PubMed ID: 9069845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Free responsibility of the decision for an assisted suicide].
    Saß H; Cording C
    Nervenarzt; 2022 Nov; 93(11):1150-1155. PubMed ID: 36094583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Suicide prevention in the context of assisted suicide].
    Lewitzka U
    Nervenarzt; 2022 Nov; 93(11):1112-1124. PubMed ID: 36121450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Supreme Court addresses physician-assisted suicide. Can its rulings improve palliative care?
    Alpers A; Lo B
    Arch Fam Med; 1999; 8(3):200-5. PubMed ID: 10333814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Liability in medical-assisted suicide].
    Cembrani F
    G Ital Nefrol; 2020 Feb; 37(1):. PubMed ID: 32068365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A democratic decision. No constitutional support for assisted suicide.
    Burns LP
    Mich Health Hosp; 1997; 33(5):24. PubMed ID: 10173293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Euthanasia: legal comparison in selected European countries].
    Doležal A
    Vnitr Lek; 2018; 64(3):257-265. PubMed ID: 29766728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Legal issues of physician-assisted euthanasia. Part III--Passive euthanasia, comparison of international legislation, conclusions for medical practice].
    Laux J; Röbel A; Parzeller M
    Arch Kriminol; 2013; 231(3-4):73-115. PubMed ID: 23678624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Kevorkian v. Arnett.
    United States. District Court. Central District Court of California
    Wests Fed Suppl; 1996; 939():725-32. PubMed ID: 16320472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How then should we die?: California's "Death with Dignity" Act.
    Evans RW
    Med Etika Bioet; 2000; 7(1-2):3-9. PubMed ID: 11933980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The influence of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on the German jurisdiction and legalisation regarding compulsory measures].
    Müller S
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2018 Aug; 86(8):485-492. PubMed ID: 30125919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.