These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34119646)

  • 1. Noncollapsibility, confounding, and sparse-data bias. Part 1: The oddities of odds.
    Greenland S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():178-181. PubMed ID: 34119646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noncollapsibility, confounding, and sparse-data bias. Part 2: What should researchers make of persistent controversies about the odds ratio?
    Greenland S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Nov; 139():264-268. PubMed ID: 34119647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Studying noncollapsibility of the odds ratio with marginal structural and logistic regression models.
    Pang M; Kaufman JS; Platt RW
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):1925-1937. PubMed ID: 24108272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noncollapsibility in studies based on nonrepresentative samples.
    Pizzi C; Pearce N; Richiardi L
    Ann Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 25(12):955-8. PubMed ID: 26603127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Noncollapsibility and its role in quantifying confounding bias in logistic regression.
    Schuster NA; Twisk JWR; Ter Riet G; Heymans MW; Rijnhart JJM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Jul; 21(1):136. PubMed ID: 34225653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. False Appearance of Gene-Environment Interactions in Genetic Association Studies.
    Su YS; Lee WC
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Mar; 95(9):e2743. PubMed ID: 26945360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Note on the Noncollapsibility of Rate Differences and Rate Ratios.
    Sjölander A; Dahlqwist E; Zetterqvist J
    Epidemiology; 2016 May; 27(3):356-9. PubMed ID: 26680297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Misleading Epidemiological and Statistical Evidence in the Presence of Simpson's Paradox: An Illustrative Study Using Simulated Scenarios of Observational Study Designs.
    Rojanaworarit C
    J Med Life; 2020; 13(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 32341699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Defining, Quantifying, and Interpreting "Noncollapsibility" in Epidemiologic Studies of Measures of "Effect".
    Whitcomb BW; Naimi AI
    Am J Epidemiol; 2021 May; 190(5):697-700. PubMed ID: 33305812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simpson's paradox and experimental research.
    Ameringer S; Serlin RC; Ward S
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 19289933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Simpson's paradox unraveled.
    Hernán MA; Clayton D; Keiding N
    Int J Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 40(3):780-5. PubMed ID: 21454324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the performance of two-stage residual inclusion methods when using physician's prescribing preference as an instrumental variable: unmeasured confounding and noncollapsibility.
    Zhang L; Lewsey J
    J Comp Eff Res; 2024 May; 13(5):e230085. PubMed ID: 38567965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relation of collapsibility and confounding to faithfulness and stability.
    Mansournia MA; Greenland S
    Epidemiology; 2015 Jul; 26(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 25867114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding and identifying bias and confounding in the medical literature.
    Hsu JL; Banerjee D; Kuschner WG
    South Med J; 2008 Dec; 101(12):1240-5. PubMed ID: 19005435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do as you would be done by: write as you would wish to read.
    Drummond GB; Vowler SL
    J Physiol; 2012 Dec; 590(24):6251-4. PubMed ID: 23241920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Editorial: Sparse-data Bias-What the Savvy Reader Needs to Know.
    Leopold SS; Porcher R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Apr; 476(4):657-659. PubMed ID: 29481361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.
    De Oliveira GS; Chang R; Kendall MC; Fitzgerald PC; McCarthy RJ
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22344237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Science mapping analysis characterizes 235 biases in biomedical research.
    Chavalarias D; Ioannidis JP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1205-15. PubMed ID: 20400265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-stage instrumental variable methods for estimating the causal odds ratio: analysis of bias.
    Cai B; Small DS; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1809-24. PubMed ID: 21495062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A clinician's perspective on a long time to publish.
    Peyrade F
    Lancet Haematol; 2017 Jan; 4(1):e11. PubMed ID: 27916631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.