171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34120010)
1. Image texture, low contrast liver lesion detectability and impact on dose: Deep learning algorithm compared to partial model-based iterative reconstruction.
Racine D; Brat HG; Dufour B; Steity JM; Hussenot M; Rizk B; Fournier D; Zanca F
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 141():109808. PubMed ID: 34120010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preserving image texture while reducing radiation dose with a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm in chest CT: A phantom study.
Franck C; Zhang G; Deak P; Zanca F
Phys Med; 2021 Jan; 81():86-93. PubMed ID: 33445125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Noise and spatial resolution properties of a commercially available deep learning-based CT reconstruction algorithm.
Solomon J; Lyu P; Marin D; Samei E
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3961-3971. PubMed ID: 32506661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Task-based characterization of a deep learning image reconstruction and comparison with filtered back-projection and a partial model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: A phantom study.
Racine D; Becce F; Viry A; Monnin P; Thomsen B; Verdun FR; Rotzinger DC
Phys Med; 2020 Aug; 76():28-37. PubMed ID: 32574999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Third-Generation Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique: Phantom Study of Image Noise, Spatial Resolution, Lesion Detectability, and Dose Reduction Potential.
Euler A; Solomon J; Marin D; Nelson RC; Samei E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1301-1308. PubMed ID: 29702019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low-dose liver CT: image quality and diagnostic accuracy of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm.
Caruso D; De Santis D; Del Gaudio A; Guido G; Zerunian M; Polici M; Valanzuolo D; Pugliese D; Persechino R; Cremona A; Barbato L; Caloisi A; Iannicelli E; Laghi A
Eur Radiol; 2024 Apr; 34(4):2384-2393. PubMed ID: 37688618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of different levels of CT iterative reconstruction on low-contrast detectability and radiation dose in patients of different sizes: an anthropomorphic phantom study.
Rampado O; Depaoli A; Marchisio F; Gatti M; Racine D; Ruggeri V; Ruggirello I; Darvizeh F; Fonio P; Ropolo R
Radiol Med; 2021 Jan; 126(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 32495272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study.
Greffier J; Hamard A; Pereira F; Barrau C; Pasquier H; Beregi JP; Frandon J
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3951-3959. PubMed ID: 32100091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT image quality evaluation in the age of deep learning: trade-off between functionality and fidelity.
Yang K; Cao J; Pisuchpen N; Kambadakone A; Gupta R; Marschall T; Li X; Liu B
Eur Radiol; 2023 Apr; 33(4):2439-2449. PubMed ID: 36350391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deep Learning Reconstruction Shows Better Lung Nodule Detection for Ultra-Low-Dose Chest CT.
Jiang B; Li N; Shi X; Zhang S; Li J; de Bock GH; Vliegenthart R; Xie X
Radiology; 2022 Apr; 303(1):202-212. PubMed ID: 35040674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving Low-contrast Detectability and Noise Texture Pattern for Computed Tomography Using Iterative Reconstruction Accelerated with Machine Learning Method: A Phantom Study.
Funama Y; Takahashi H; Goto T; Aoki Y; Yoshida R; Kumagai Y; Awai K
Acad Radiol; 2020 Jul; 27(7):929-936. PubMed ID: 31918961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultra-low dose chest computed tomography: Effect of iterative reconstruction levels on image quality.
Afadzi M; Lysvik EK; Andersen HK; Martinsen ACT
Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():62-68. PubMed ID: 31005179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detectability of Small Low-Attenuation Lesions With Deep Learning CT Image Reconstruction: A 24-Reader Phantom Study.
Toia GV; Zamora DA; Singleton M; Liu A; Tan E; Leng S; Shuman WP; Kanal KM; Mileto A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Feb; 220(2):283-295. PubMed ID: 36129222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial resolution, noise properties, and detectability index of a deep learning reconstruction algorithm for dual-energy CT of the abdomen.
Thor D; Titternes R; Poludniowski G
Med Phys; 2023 May; 50(5):2775-2786. PubMed ID: 36774193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Radiation Dose Reduction and Reconstruction Algorithm on Image Noise, Contrast, Resolution, and Detectability of Subtle Hypoattenuating Liver Lesions at Multidetector CT: Filtered Back Projection versus a Commercial Model-based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm.
Solomon J; Marin D; Roy Choudhury K; Patel B; Samei E
Radiology; 2017 Sep; 284(3):777-787. PubMed ID: 28170300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of Image Quality and Detectability of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (DLIR) Algorithm in Single- and Dual-energy CT.
Zhong J; Shen H; Chen Y; Xia Y; Shi X; Lu W; Li J; Xing Y; Hu Y; Ge X; Ding D; Jiang Z; Yao W
J Digit Imaging; 2023 Aug; 36(4):1390-1407. PubMed ID: 37071291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Characterization of Deep Learning Reconstruction Applied to Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Monochromatic and Material Basis Images.
Nikolau EP; Toia GV; Nett B; Tang J; Szczykutowicz TP
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2023 May-Jun 01; 47(3):437-444. PubMed ID: 37185008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of low-contrast detectability between two CT reconstruction algorithms using voxel-based 3D printed textured phantoms.
Solomon J; Ba A; Bochud F; Samei E
Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6497. PubMed ID: 27908164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CT iterative vs deep learning reconstruction: comparison of noise and sharpness.
Park C; Choo KS; Jung Y; Jeong HS; Hwang JY; Yun MS
Eur Radiol; 2021 May; 31(5):3156-3164. PubMed ID: 33057781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of a Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction Algorithm with Filtered Back Projection and Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms for Pediatric Abdominopelvic CT.
Son W; Kim M; Hwang JY; Kim YW; Park C; Choo KS; Kim TU; Jang JY
Korean J Radiol; 2022 Jul; 23(7):752-762. PubMed ID: 35695313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
