BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34120348)

  • 1. Feasibility study of 3D time-reversal reconstruction of proton-induced acoustic signals for dose verification in the head and the liver: A simulation study.
    Yu Y; Qi P; Peng H
    Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4485-4497. PubMed ID: 34120348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simulation studies of time reversal-based protoacoustic reconstruction for range and dose verification in proton therapy.
    Yu Y; Li Z; Zhang D; Xing L; Peng H
    Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3649-3662. PubMed ID: 31199511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Further investigation of 3D dose verification in proton therapy utilizing acoustic signal, wavelet decomposition and machine learning.
    Yao S; Hu Z; Xie Q; Yang Y; Peng H
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Nov; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 34768245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic-based proton range verification in heterogeneous tissue: simulation studies.
    Jones KC; Nie W; Chu JCH; Turian JV; Kassaee A; Sehgal CM; Avery S
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025018. PubMed ID: 29176057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feasibility study of range verification based on proton-induced acoustic signals and recurrent neural network.
    Yao S; Hu Z; Zhang X; Lou E; Liang Z; Wang Y; Peng H
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(21):215017. PubMed ID: 32726760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-stage ionoacoustic range verification leveraging Monte Carlo and acoustic simulations to stably account for tissue inhomogeneity and accelerator-specific time structure - A simulation study.
    Patch SK; Hoff DEM; Webb TB; Sobotka LG; Zhao T
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):783-793. PubMed ID: 29159885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proton beam characterization by proton-induced acoustic emission: simulation studies.
    Jones KC; Witztum A; Sehgal CM; Avery S
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 59(21):6549-63. PubMed ID: 25322212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Theoretical detection threshold of the proton-acoustic range verification technique.
    Ahmad M; Xiang L; Yousefi S; Xing L
    Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5735-44. PubMed ID: 26429247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3D
    Jiang Z; Sun L; Yao W; Wu QJ; Xiang L; Ren L
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Oct; 67(21):. PubMed ID: 36206745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Range verification of a clinical proton beam in an abdominal phantom by co-registration of ionoacoustics and ultrasound.
    Schauer J; Wieser HP; Lascaud J; Huang Y; Vidal M; Herault J; Ntziachristos V; Dollinger G; Parodi K
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Jun; 68(12):. PubMed ID: 37220766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feasibility of RACT for 3D dose measurement and range verification in a water phantom.
    Alsanea F; Moskvin V; Stantz KM
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):937-46. PubMed ID: 25652506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simulation of x-ray-induced acoustic imaging for absolute dosimetry: Accuracy of image reconstruction methods.
    Forghani F; Mahl A; Patton TJ; Jones BL; Borden MA; Westerly DC; Altunbas C; Miften M; Thomas DH
    Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1280-1290. PubMed ID: 31828781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single pulse protoacoustic range verification using a clinical synchrocyclotron.
    Caron J; Gonzalez G; Pandey PK; Wang S; Prather K; Ahmad S; Xiang L; Chen Y
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Feb; 68(4):. PubMed ID: 36634371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simulation study of protoacoustics as a real-time in-line dosimetry tool for FLASH proton therapy.
    Kim K; Pandey PK; Gonzalez G; Chen Y; Xiang L
    Med Phys; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38116792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. X-ray-induced acoustic computed tomography for guiding prone stereotactic partial breast irradiation: a simulation study.
    Zheng Y; Samant P; Merill J; Chen Y; Ahmad S; Li D; Xiang L
    Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):4386-4395. PubMed ID: 32428252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward a new treatment planning approach accounting for in vivo proton range verification.
    Tian L; Landry G; Dedes G; Kamp F; Pinto M; Niepel K; Belka C; Parodi K
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(21):215025. PubMed ID: 30375361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new treatment planning approach accounting for prompt gamma range verification and interfractional anatomical changes.
    Tian L; Landry G; Dedes G; Pinto M; Kamp F; Belka C; Parodi K
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Apr; 65(9):095005. PubMed ID: 32135530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Proton range verification in homogeneous materials through acoustic measurements.
    Nie W; Jones KC; Petro S; Kassaee A; Sehgal CM; Avery S
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025036. PubMed ID: 29160776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ionoacoustic characterization of the proton Bragg peak with submillimeter accuracy.
    Assmann W; Kellnberger S; Reinhardt S; Lehrack S; Edlich A; Thirolf PG; Moser M; Dollinger G; Omar M; Ntziachristos V; Parodi K
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):567-74. PubMed ID: 25652477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic time-of-flight for proton range verification in water.
    Jones KC; Vander Stappen F; Sehgal CM; Avery S
    Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5213. PubMed ID: 27587053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.