128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34120392)
1. Pathology associated with adherent perirenal fat and its clinical effect.
Ceyhan E; Ileri F; Aki FT; Yazici MS; Karcaaltincaba M; Ertoy Baydar D; Bilen CY
Int J Clin Pract; 2021 Oct; 75(10):e14518. PubMed ID: 34120392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mayo adhesive probability score: an accurate image-based scoring system to predict adherent perinephric fat in partial nephrectomy.
Davidiuk AJ; Parker AS; Thomas CS; Leibovich BC; Castle EP; Heckman MG; Custer K; Thiel DD
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1165-71. PubMed ID: 25192968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adherent Perinephric Fat Is a Surgical Risk Factor in Laparoscopic Single-Site Donor Nephrectomy: Analysis Using Mayo Adhesive Probability Score.
Yanishi M; Kinoshita H; Koito Y; Taniguchi H; Mishima T; Sugi M; Matsuda T
Transplant Proc; 2020; 52(1):84-88. PubMed ID: 31901325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting Adherent Perinephric Fat Using Preoperative Clinical and Radiological Factors in Patients Undergoing Partial Nephrectomy.
Borregales LD; Adibi M; Thomas AZ; Reis RB; Chery LJ; Devine CE; Wang X; Potretzke AM; Potretzke T; Figenshau RS; Bauman TM; Aboshady YI; Abel EJ; Matin SF; Karam JA; Wood CG
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):397-403. PubMed ID: 31685445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical Implication of Adherent Perinephric Fat in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Validation With Video Review.
Kim H; Kim M; Byun SS; Hong SK; Lee S
Front Surg; 2022; 9():840664. PubMed ID: 35465429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting ease of perinephric fat dissection at time of open partial nephrectomy using preoperative fat density characteristics.
Zheng Y; Espiritu P; Hakky T; Jutras K; Spiess PE
BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6):872-80. PubMed ID: 24274617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of the impact of adherent perirenal fat on peri-operative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy.
Khene ZE; Peyronnet B; Mathieu R; Fardoun T; Verhoest G; Bensalah K
World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1801-6. PubMed ID: 25669610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: effect of perirenal fat upon donor operative time.
Anderson KM; Lindler TU; Lamberton GR; Baron PW; Ojogho OK; Baldwin DD
J Endourol; 2008 Oct; 22(10):2269-74. PubMed ID: 18831674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adherent perinephric fat at minimally invasive partial nephrectomy is associated with adverse peri-operative outcomes and malignant renal histology.
Kocher NJ; Kunchala S; Reynolds C; Lehman E; Nie S; Raman JD
BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117(4):636-41. PubMed ID: 26573951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective assessment and histological analysis of adherent perinephric fat in partial nephrectomies.
Dariane C; Le Guilchet T; Hurel S; Audenet F; Beaugerie A; Badoual C; Tordjman J; Clément K; Urien S; Pietak M; Fontaine E; Méjean A; Timsit MO
Urol Oncol; 2017 Feb; 35(2):39.e9-39.e17. PubMed ID: 28341496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Simple Nephrectomy Is Not Always Simple: Predictors of Surgical Difficulties.
Atik YT; Cimen HI; Gul D; Uysal B; Köse O; Halis F
Urol Int; 2022; 106(6):553-559. PubMed ID: 35051943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical predictors and significance of adherent perinephric fat assessed with Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score and perinephric fat surface density (PnFSD) at the time of partial nephrectomy for localized renal mass. A single high-volume referral center experience.
DI Maida F; Vittori G; Campi R; Mari A; Tellini R; Sforza S; Sessa F; Lucarini S; Miele V; Vignozzi L; Masieri L; Carini M; Minervini A
Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2021 Apr; 73(2):225-232. PubMed ID: 32026669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contemporary outcomes and prediction of adherent perinephric fat at partial nephrectomy: a systematic review.
Lee SM; Robertson I; Stonier T; Simson N; Amer T; Aboumarzouk OM
Scand J Urol; 2017 Dec; 51(6):429-434. PubMed ID: 28784033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk Factors Influencing the Thickness and Stranding of Perinephric Fat of Mayo Adhesive Probability Score in Minimally Invasive Nephrectomy.
Yao Y; Gong H; Pang Y; Gu L; Niu S; Xu Y; Li P; Liu K; Tang L; Xuan Y; Gao Y; Zhang X
Med Sci Monit; 2019 May; 25():3825-3831. PubMed ID: 31118409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perirenal fat thickness measured with computed tomography is a reliable estimate of perirenal fat mass.
Favre G; Grangeon-Chapon C; Raffaelli C; François-Chalmin F; Iannelli A; Esnault V
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175561. PubMed ID: 28423008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective evaluation of the association of adherent perinephric fat with perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy.
Davidiuk AJ; Parker AS; Thomas CS; Heckman MG; Custer K; Thiel DD
Urology; 2015 Apr; 85(4):836-42. PubMed ID: 25669734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Zoning inside the renal fascia: The anatomical relationship between the urinary system and perirenal fat.
Ochi A; Muro S; Adachi T; Akita K
Int J Urol; 2020 Jul; 27(7):625-633. PubMed ID: 32314429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of quantitative computed tomography texture analysis in the prediction of adherent perinephric fat.
Khene ZE; Bensalah K; Largent A; Shariat S; Verhoest G; Peyronnet B; Acosta O; DeCrevoisier R; Mathieu R
World J Urol; 2018 Oct; 36(10):1635-1642. PubMed ID: 29675631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of the Mayo Adhesive Probability Score on the Complexity of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy.
Ishiyama R; Kondo T; Takagi T; Iizuka J; Kobayashi H; Omae K; Fukuda H; Ishihara H; Tanabe K
J Endourol; 2018 Oct; 32(10):928-933. PubMed ID: 30141346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gender differences in subcutaneous and perirenal fat distribution.
Eisner BH; Zargooshi J; Berger AD; Cooperberg MR; Doyle SM; Sheth S; Stoller ML
Surg Radiol Anat; 2010 Nov; 32(9):879-82. PubMed ID: 20607260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
