These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34120522)

  • 1. The role of language production in making predictions during comprehension.
    Lelonkiewicz JR; Rabagliati H; Pickering MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Dec; 74(12):2193-2209. PubMed ID: 34120522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Encouraging prediction during production facilitates subsequent comprehension: Evidence from interleaved object naming in sentence context and sentence reading.
    Hintz F; Meyer AS; Huettig F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(6):1056-63. PubMed ID: 26652170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word predictability blurs the lines between production and comprehension: Evidence from the production effect in memory.
    Rommers J; Dell GS; Benjamin AS
    Cognition; 2020 May; 198():104206. PubMed ID: 32035323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comprehension exposures to words in sentence contexts impact spoken word production.
    Francis WS; Gurrola BV; Martínez M
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jan; 50(1):192-215. PubMed ID: 34453287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oral reading promotes predictive processing in Chinese sentence reading: eye movement evidence.
    Chang M; Pu Z; Wang J
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e18307. PubMed ID: 39430560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.
    Bonhage CE; Mueller JL; Friederici AD; Fiebach CJ
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():33-47. PubMed ID: 26003489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diving into a pool or volcano? Examining the influence of sentence context and task demands on sentence reading in younger and older adults.
    Haigh P; Hanif N; de Bruin A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0279555. PubMed ID: 36584104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The production effect and the generation effect improve memory in picture naming.
    Zormpa E; Brehm LE; Hoedemaker RS; Meyer AS
    Memory; 2019 Mar; 27(3):340-352. PubMed ID: 30141365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural Evidence for the Prediction of Animacy Features during Language Comprehension: Evidence from MEG and EEG Representational Similarity Analysis.
    Wang L; Wlotko E; Alexander E; Schoot L; Kim M; Warnke L; Kuperberg GR
    J Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 40(16):3278-3291. PubMed ID: 32161141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Production does not improve memory for face-name associations.
    Hourihan KL; Smith AR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 27244356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effects of Semantic and Syntactic Prediction on Reading Aloud.
    Gavard E; Ziegler JC
    Exp Psychol; 2022 Nov; 69(6):308-319. PubMed ID: 36809159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Commonalities in alpha and beta neural desynchronizations during prediction in language comprehension and production.
    Gastaldon S; Arcara G; Navarrete E; Peressotti F
    Cortex; 2020 Dec; 133():328-345. PubMed ID: 33171348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Word predictability effects are linear, not logarithmic: Implications for probabilistic models of sentence comprehension.
    Brothers T; Kuperberg GR
    J Mem Lang; 2021 Feb; 116():. PubMed ID: 33100508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reading text aloud benefits memory but not comprehension.
    Roberts BRT; Hu ZS; Curtis E; Bodner GE; McLean D; MacLeod CM
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Jan; 52(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 37440162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ahead of time: Early sentence slow cortical modulations associated to semantic prediction.
    León-Cabrera P; Flores A; Rodríguez-Fornells A; Morís J
    Neuroimage; 2019 Apr; 189():192-201. PubMed ID: 30625396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual simulation in developing language comprehension.
    Engelen JA; Bouwmeester S; de Bruin AB; Zwaan RA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Dec; 110(4):659-75. PubMed ID: 21803371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Different language control mechanisms in comprehension and production: Evidence from paragraph reading.
    Li C; Midgley KJ; Ferreira VS; Holcomb PJ; Gollan TH
    Brain Lang; 2024 Jan; 248():105367. PubMed ID: 38113600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effect of Syntactic Impairment on Errors in Reading Aloud: Text Reading and Comprehension of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children.
    Szterman R; Friedmann N
    Brain Sci; 2020 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 33238465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time for prediction? The effect of presentation rate on predictive sentence comprehension during word-by-word reading.
    Wlotko EW; Federmeier KD
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():20-32. PubMed ID: 25987437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimal Overlap in Language Control Across Production And Comprehension: Evidence from Read-Aloud Versus Eye-Tracking Tasks.
    Ahn D; Abbott MJ; Rayner K; Ferreira VS; Gollan TH
    J Neurolinguistics; 2020 May; 54():. PubMed ID: 32189830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.