These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34120812)

  • 1. Comparison of additive manufactured models of the mandible in accuracy and quality using six different 3D printing systems.
    Gottsauner M; Reichert T; Koerdt S; Wieser S; Klingelhoeffer C; Kirschneck C; Hoffmann J; Ettl T; Ristow O
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2021 Sep; 49(9):855-866. PubMed ID: 34120812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base.
    Rungrojwittayakul O; Kan JY; Shiozaki K; Swamidass RS; Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Lozada JL
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 31498957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation study of 3D-printed anatomical models using 2 PLA printers for preoperative planning in trauma surgery, a human cadaver study.
    Brouwers L; Teutelink A; van Tilborg FAJB; de Jongh MAC; Lansink KWW; Bemelman M
    Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2019 Dec; 45(6):1013-1020. PubMed ID: 29947848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A systematic evaluation of medical 3D printing accuracy of multi-pathological anatomical models for surgical planning manufactured in elastic and rigid material using desktop inverted vat photopolymerization.
    Ravi P; Chepelev L; Lawera N; Haque KMA; Chen VCP; Ali A; Rybicki FJ
    Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):3223-3233. PubMed ID: 33733499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of open-source software segmentation and paper-based printed three-dimensional models.
    Szymor P; Kozakiewicz M; Olszewski R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 44(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 26748414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of five different 3D printing workflows for dental models comparing industrial and dental desktop printers.
    Morón-Conejo B; López-Vilagran J; Cáceres D; Berrendero S; Pradíes G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jun; 27(6):2521-2532. PubMed ID: 36462040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of three-dimensional, paper-based models generated using a low-cost, three-dimensional printer.
    Olszewski R; Szymor P; Kozakiewicz M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1847-52. PubMed ID: 25176496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can an entry-level 3D printer create high-quality anatomical models? Accuracy assessment of mandibular models printed by a desktop 3D printer and a professional device.
    Hatz CR; Msallem B; Aghlmandi S; Brantner P; Thieringer FM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jan; 49(1):143-148. PubMed ID: 31300302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the fit of surgical guides manufactured with low-cost 3D printers.
    Bennett GW; Kim SK
    Gen Dent; 2022; 70(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 34978984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy.
    Zhang ZC; Li PL; Chu FT; Shen G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2019 Jul; 80(4):194-204. PubMed ID: 31172199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis.
    Emir F; Ayyildiz S
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 33177305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benefits and Limitations of Entry-Level 3-Dimensional Printing of Maxillofacial Skeletal Models.
    Legocki AT; Duffy-Peter A; Scott AR
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 143(4):389-394. PubMed ID: 28056140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of current additive manufacturing systems for orthodontic 3-dimensional printing.
    Akyalcin S; Rutkowski P; Arrigo M; Trotman CA; Kasper FK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Oct; 160(4):594-602. PubMed ID: 34579820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing the accuracy of 3 different liquid crystal display printers for dental model printing.
    Tsolakis IA; Lyros I; Christopoulou I; Tsolakis AI; Papadopoulos MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Jul; 166(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 38647515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison in Terms of Accuracy between DLP and LCD Printing Technology for Dental Model Printing.
    Tsolakis IA; Papaioannou W; Papadopoulou E; Dalampira M; Tsolakis AI
    Dent J (Basel); 2022 Sep; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 36285991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro accuracies of 3D printed models manufactured by two different printing technologies.
    Emir F; Ceylan G; Ayyildiz S
    Eur Oral Res; 2021 May; 55(2):80-85. PubMed ID: 34250474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: An in vitro study.
    Herschdorfer L; Negreiros WM; Gallucci GO; Hamilton A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):905-910. PubMed ID: 32499166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of 6 Desktop 3D Printers in Dentistry: A Comparative In Vitro Study.
    Mangano FG; Admakin O; Bonacina M; Biaggini F; Farronato D; Lerner H
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2020 May; 28(2):75-85. PubMed ID: 32347671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy, reproducibility, and dimensional stability of additively manufactured surgical templates.
    Chen L; Lin WS; Polido WD; Eckert GJ; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Sep; 122(3):309-314. PubMed ID: 30948293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of free CAD software for 3D printing individualized face masks based on face scans.
    Cortes ARG; Galea K; No-Cortes J; Sammut EJ; Alzoubi EE; Attard NJ
    Int J Comput Dent; 2020; 23(2):183-189. PubMed ID: 32337516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.