These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3412280)

  • 21. Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.
    Plevritis SK; Kurian AW; Sigal BM; Daniel BL; Ikeda DM; Stockdale FE; Garber AM
    JAMA; 2006 May; 295(20):2374-84. PubMed ID: 16720823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mammography 1984: challenge to radiology.
    McLelland R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Jul; 143(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 6428201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Low-cost screening mammography.
    North C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Aug; 159(2):431; author reply 431-2. PubMed ID: 1632375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Is screening mammography routinely indicated for women between 40 and 50 years of age? An affirmative view.
    Dodd GD
    J Fam Pract; 1988 Sep; 27(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 3138382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States.
    Burnside E; Belkora J; Esserman L
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2001 Jul; 2(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 11899786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of continuing medical education and cost reduction on physician compliance with mammography screening guidelines.
    Lane DS; Polednak AP; Burg MA
    J Fam Pract; 1991 Oct; 33(4):359-68. PubMed ID: 1919452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Counting the costs of mammography screening: first year results from the Sydney study.
    Gerard K; Salkeld G; Hall J
    Med J Aust; 1990 May; 152(9):466, 469-71. PubMed ID: 2381337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Baseline screening mammography: one vs two views per breast.
    Sickles EA; Weber WN; Galvin HB; Ominsky SH; Sollitto RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Dec; 147(6):1149-53. PubMed ID: 3490749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Low-cost screening mammography.
    Evens RG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Aug; 159(2):430-1; author reply 431-2. PubMed ID: 1307858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Cost analysis of a mammographic screening program].
    Vanara F; Ponti A; Frigerio A; Segnan N
    Epidemiol Prev; 1995 Dec; 19(65):318-29. PubMed ID: 8852081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The patient burden of screening mammography recall.
    Alcusky M; Philpotts L; Bonafede M; Clarke J; Skoufalos A
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2014 Sep; 23 Suppl 1():S11-9. PubMed ID: 25247382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is screening mammography routinely indicated for women between 40 and 50 years of age? An opposing view.
    Taplin S
    J Fam Pract; 1988 Sep; 27(3):316-20. PubMed ID: 3047307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimating personal costs incurred by a woman participating in mammography screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
    Ekwueme DU; Hall IJ; Richardson LC; Gardner JG; Royalty J; Thompson TD
    Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):592-601. PubMed ID: 18536027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: pattern of use and health care system costs.
    Olivotto IA; Kan L; Mates D; King S
    CMAJ; 1999 Feb; 160(3):337-41. PubMed ID: 10065075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of an intervention to increase mammography screening in Los Angeles.
    Bastani R; Marcus AC; Maxwell AE; Das IP; Yan KX
    Prev Med; 1994 Jan; 23(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 8016038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Critical notes on the risk/benefit/cost discussion in mammography from the clinical point of view].
    Frischbier HJ; Würthner K
    Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1977; 18():95-100. PubMed ID: 414383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Counting the costs of mammography screening: first year results from the Sydney study.
    Med J Aust; 1990 Aug; 153(3):174-6. PubMed ID: 2377128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Family physicians' beliefs about breast cancer screening by mammography.
    Cummings KM; Funch DP; Mettlin C; Jennings E
    J Fam Pract; 1983 Dec; 17(6):1029-34. PubMed ID: 6644252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Low-cost screening mammography: results of 21,141 consecutive examinations in a community program.
    Lynde JL
    South Med J; 1993 Mar; 86(3):338-43. PubMed ID: 8451676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. American Cancer Society: Cost of screening mammography. Issues, recommendations, and solutions.
    Cancer; 1987 Oct; 60(7 Suppl):1694-9. PubMed ID: 3651997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.