These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34124206)

  • 1. Molecular and Mechanical Mechanisms of Calcification Pathology Induced by Bicuspid Aortic Valve Abnormalities.
    Kazik HB; Kandail HS; LaDisa JF; Lincoln J
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2021; 8():677977. PubMed ID: 34124206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ex vivo evidence for the contribution of hemodynamic shear stress abnormalities to the early pathogenesis of calcific bicuspid aortic valve disease.
    Sun L; Chandra S; Sucosky P
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e48843. PubMed ID: 23119099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computational assessment of bicuspid aortic valve wall-shear stress: implications for calcific aortic valve disease.
    Chandra S; Rajamannan NM; Sucosky P
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2012 Sep; 11(7):1085-96. PubMed ID: 22294208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computational comparison of regional stress and deformation characteristics in tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valve leaflets.
    Cao K; Sucosky P
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2017 Mar; 33(3):. PubMed ID: 27138991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A computational analysis of potential aortic dilation induced by the hemodynamic effects of bicuspid aortic valve phenotypes.
    Hou Q; Tao K; Du T; Wei H; Zhang H; Chen S; Pan Y; Qiao A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jun; 220():106811. PubMed ID: 35447428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Steady flow hemodynamic and energy loss measurements in normal and simulated calcified tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves.
    Seaman C; Akingba AG; Sucosky P
    J Biomech Eng; 2014 Apr; 136(4):. PubMed ID: 24474392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of the aortic cusps fusion pattern and valve disease severity on the aortic wall mechanics in patients with bicuspid aortic valve.
    Kalinowski ME; Szulik M; Pawlak S; Rybus-Kalinowska B; Zembala M; Kalarus Z; Kukulski T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Aug; 36(8):1429-1436. PubMed ID: 32303878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bicuspid aortic valve hemodynamics induces abnormal medial remodeling in the convexity of porcine ascending aortas.
    Atkins SK; Cao K; Rajamannan NM; Sucosky P
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2014 Nov; 13(6):1209-25. PubMed ID: 24599392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bicuspid aortic valve leaflet morphology in relation to aortic root morphology: a study of 300 patients undergoing open-heart surgery.
    Jackson V; Petrini J; Caidahl K; Eriksson MJ; Liska J; Eriksson P; Franco-Cereceda A
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Sep; 40(3):e118-24. PubMed ID: 21620721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical Assessment of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Phenotypes: A Fluid-Structure Interaction Modelling Approach.
    de Oliveira DMC; Abdullah N; Green NC; Espino DM
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2020 Aug; 11(4):431-447. PubMed ID: 32519086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Etiology of bicuspid aortic valve disease: Focus on hemodynamics.
    Atkins SK; Sucosky P
    World J Cardiol; 2014 Dec; 6(12):1227-33. PubMed ID: 25548612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Fluid-Structure Interaction Study of Different Bicuspid Aortic Valve Phenotypes Throughout the Cardiac Cycle.
    Yan W; Li J; Wang W; Wei L; Wang S
    Front Physiol; 2021; 12():716015. PubMed ID: 34381379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fused aortic valve without an elliptical-shaped systolic orifice in patients with severe aortic stenosis: cardiac computed tomography is useful for differentiation between bicuspid aortic valve with raphe and tricuspid aortic valve with commissural fusion.
    Bak SH; Ko SM; Song MG; Shin JK; Chee HK; Kim JS
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Apr; 25(4):1208-17. PubMed ID: 25424562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Progressive Calcification in Bicuspid Valves: A Coupled Hemodynamics and Multiscale Structural Computations.
    Lavon K; Morany A; Halevi R; Hamdan A; Raanani E; Bluestein D; Haj-Ali R
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Dec; 49(12):3310-3322. PubMed ID: 34708308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abnormal mechanical stress on bicuspid aortic valve induces valvular calcification and inhibits Notch1/NICD/Runx2 signal.
    Li G; Shen N; Deng H; Wang Y; Kong G; Shi J; Dong N; Deng C
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e14950. PubMed ID: 36908813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Morphotype-Dependent Flow Characteristics in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Ascending Aortas: A Benchtop Particle Image Velocimetry Study.
    McNally A; Madan A; Sucosky P
    Front Physiol; 2017; 8():44. PubMed ID: 28203207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ex vivo assessment of valve thickness/calcification of patients with calcific aortic stenosis in relation to in vivo clinical outcomes.
    Cheng CL; Chang HH; Huang PJ; Wang WC; Lin SY
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Oct; 74():324-332. PubMed ID: 28651163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The congenital bicuspid aortic valve can experience high-frequency unsteady shear stresses on its leaflet surface.
    Yap CH; Saikrishnan N; Tamilselvan G; Vasilyev N; Yoganathan AP
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2012 Sep; 303(6):H721-31. PubMed ID: 22821994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fully coupled fluid-structure interaction model of congenital bicuspid aortic valves: effect of asymmetry on hemodynamics.
    Marom G; Kim HS; Rosenfeld M; Raanani E; Haj-Ali R
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2013 Aug; 51(8):839-48. PubMed ID: 23475570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.