These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34124920)

  • 1. Top-down and bottom-up guidance in normal aging during scene search.
    Ramzaoui H; Faure S; Spotorno S
    Psychol Aging; 2021 Jun; 36(4):433-451. PubMed ID: 34124920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Top-down and bottom-up sources of eye-movement guidance during realistic scene search in Alzheimer's disease.
    Ramzaoui H; Faure S; David R; Spotorno S
    Neuropsychology; 2022 Oct; 36(7):597-613. PubMed ID: 35797174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrasting episodic and template-based guidance during search through natural scenes.
    Bahle B; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):523-536. PubMed ID: 30920285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.
    Kiss M; Grubert A; Petersen A; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):749-59. PubMed ID: 21861683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional capture by incongruent object/background scenes in patients with Alzheimer disease.
    Lenoble Q; Corveleyn X; Szaffarczyk S; Pasquier F; Boucart M
    Cortex; 2018 Oct; 107():4-12. PubMed ID: 30006000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scene priming provides clues about target appearance that improve attentional guidance during categorical search.
    Robbins A; Hout MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Feb; 46(2):220-230. PubMed ID: 31697157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrasting gist-based and template-based guidance during real-world visual search.
    Bahle B; Matsukura M; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):367-386. PubMed ID: 28795834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beyond scene gist: Objects guide search more than scene background.
    Koehler K; Eckstein MP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jun; 43(6):1177-1193. PubMed ID: 28287759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disentangling the effects of spatial inconsistency of targets and distractors when searching in realistic scenes.
    Spotorno S; Malcolm GL; Tatler BW
    J Vis; 2015 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 25761330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophysiological evidence of low salience distractor interference during visual search.
    Fortier-Gauthier U; Jolicœur P
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13068. PubMed ID: 29423999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Top-down but not bottom-up visual scanning is affected in hereditary pure cerebellar ataxia.
    Matsuda S; Matsumoto H; Furubayashi T; Fukuda H; Emoto M; Hanajima R; Tsuji S; Ugawa Y; Terao Y
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116181. PubMed ID: 25545148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age-related differences during visual search: the role of contextual expectations and cognitive control mechanisms.
    Borges MT; Fernandes EG; Coco MI
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2020 Jul; 27(4):489-516. PubMed ID: 31307316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age differences in vulnerability to distraction under arousal.
    Gallant SN; Durbin KA; Mather M
    Psychol Aging; 2020 Aug; 35(5):780-791. PubMed ID: 32744858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age-related changes in the neural dynamics of bottom-up and top-down processing during visual object recognition: an electrophysiological investigation.
    Lai LY; Frömer R; Festa EK; Heindel WC
    Neurobiol Aging; 2020 Oct; 94():38-49. PubMed ID: 32562874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pre-stimulus activity predicts the winner of top-down vs. bottom-up attentional selection.
    Mazaheri A; DiQuattro NE; Bengson J; Geng JJ
    PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e16243. PubMed ID: 21386896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
    Kerzel D; Witzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interactions between top-down and bottom-up attention in barn owls (Tyto alba).
    Lev-Ari T; Gutfreund Y
    Anim Cogn; 2018 Mar; 21(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 29214438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How context information and target information guide the eyes from the first epoch of search in real-world scenes.
    Spotorno S; Malcolm GL; Tatler BW
    J Vis; 2014 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 24520149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Expectations and perceptual priming in a visual search task: Evidence from eye movements and behavior.
    Shurygina O; Kristjánsson Á; Tudge L; Chetverikov A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):489-499. PubMed ID: 30816788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Salience determines attentional orienting in visual selection.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1051-1057. PubMed ID: 32757594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.