These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34124924)

  • 41. Word frequency and predictability effects in reading French: an evaluation of the E-Z Reader model.
    Miellet S; Sparrow L; Sereno SC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Aug; 14(4):762-9. PubMed ID: 17972746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Frequency and predictability effects in the Dundee Corpus: an eye movement analysis.
    Kennedy A; Pynte J; Murray WS; Paul SA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):601-18. PubMed ID: 22643118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of word predictability, child development, and aging on time-gated speech recognition performance.
    Craig CH; Kim BW; Rhyner PM; Chirillo TK
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Aug; 36(4):832-41. PubMed ID: 8377495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Parafoveal previews and lexical frequency in natural reading: Evidence from eye movements and fixation-related potentials.
    Degno F; Loberg O; Zang C; Zhang M; Donnelly N; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Mar; 148(3):453-474. PubMed ID: 30335444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. What's "left"? Hemispheric sensitivity to predictability and congruity during sentence reading by older adults.
    Federmeier KD; Kutas M
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Oct; 133():107173. PubMed ID: 31430444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effect of foveal and parafoveal masks on the eye movements of older and younger readers.
    Rayner K; Yang J; Schuett S; Slattery TJ
    Psychol Aging; 2014 Jun; 29(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 24730466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. When experience meets language statistics: Individual variability in processing English compound words.
    Falkauskas K; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1607-27. PubMed ID: 26076328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Semantic preview benefit during reading.
    Hohenstein S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):166-90. PubMed ID: 23895448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Novel word learning: An eye-tracking study. Are 18-month-old late talkers really different from their typical peers?
    Ellis EM; Borovsky A; Elman JL; Evans JL
    J Commun Disord; 2015; 58():143-57. PubMed ID: 26188415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Lexical predictability exerts robust effects on fixation duration, but not on initial landing position during reading.
    Vainio S; Hyönä J; Pajunen A
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 19261580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Verbal and nonverbal predictors of language-mediated anticipatory eye movements.
    Rommers J; Meyer AS; Huettig F
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):720-30. PubMed ID: 25795276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Testing the limits of contextual constraint: Interactions with word frequency and parafoveal preview during fluent reading.
    Sereno SC; Hand CJ; Shahid A; Yao B; O'Donnell PJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jan; 71(1):302-313. PubMed ID: 28481189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Learning morphologically complex spoken words: Orthographic expectations of embedded stems are formed prior to print exposure.
    Beyersmann E; Wegener S; Nation K; Prokupzcuk A; Wang HC; Castles A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 31916831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model.
    Rayner K; Ashby J; Pollatsek A; Reichle ED
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Aug; 30(4):720-32. PubMed ID: 15301620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Eye movements of older and younger readers when reading unspaced text.
    Rayner K; Yang J; Schuett S; Slattery TJ
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(5):354-61. PubMed ID: 23681016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A further examination of the lexical-processing stages hypothesized by the E-Z Reader model.
    Sheridan H; Reingold EM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Apr; 75(3):407-14. PubMed ID: 23456972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Eye movements of young and older adults while reading with distraction.
    Kemper S; McDowd J; Kramer A
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Mar; 21(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 16594789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Lexical quality and eye movements: individual differences in the perceptual span of skilled adult readers.
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):703-27. PubMed ID: 23972214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Word's Predictability Can Modulate Semantic Preview Effect in High-Constraint Sentences.
    Xu L; Liu S; Wang S; Sun D; Li N
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():849351. PubMed ID: 35401306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Limits on lexical prediction during reading.
    Luke SG; Christianson K
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Aug; 88():22-60. PubMed ID: 27376659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.