173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34125255)
1. Good to excellent long-term survival of a single-design condylar constrained knee arthroplasty for primary and revision surgery.
Theil C; Schwarze J; Gosheger G; Poggenpohl L; Ackmann T; Moellenbeck B; Schmidt-Braekling T; Ahrens H
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2022 Sep; 30(9):3184-3190. PubMed ID: 34125255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Satisfactory mid-term outcomes of condylar-constrained knee implants in primary total knee arthroplasty: clinical and radiological follow-up.
Mancino F; De Martino I; Burrofato A; De Ieso C; Saccomanno MF; Maccauro G; De Santis V
J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Dec; 21(1):22. PubMed ID: 33263831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Superior Survivorship for Posterior Stabilized Versus Constrained Condylar Articulations After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective, Comparative Analysis at Short-Term Follow-Up.
Kunze KN; Akram F; Fuller BC; Choi J; Sporer SM; Levine BR
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Dec; 34(12):3012-3017.e1. PubMed ID: 31378508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary constrained and hinged total knee arthroplasty: 2- and 5-year revision risk compared with unconstrained total knee arthroplasty: a report on 401 cases from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994-2017.
Badawy M; Fenstad AM; Furnes O
Acta Orthop; 2019 Oct; 90(5):467-472. PubMed ID: 31210080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical outcome and survival rate of condylar constrained knee prosthesis in revision total knee arthroplasty: an average nine point six year follow-up.
Yu M; Xu Y; Weng X; Feng B
Int Orthop; 2024 May; 48(5):1179-1187. PubMed ID: 38353709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Condylar constrained and rotating hinged implants in revision knee arthroplasty show similar survivorship and clinical outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Stroobant L; de Taeye T; Byttebier P; Van Onsem S; Jacobs E; Burssens A; Victor J
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Dec; 31(12):5365-5380. PubMed ID: 37747534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does Knee Prosthesis Survivorship Improve When Implant Designs Change? Findings from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
Lewis PL; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Campbell DG; Peng Y; Hatton A; Lorimer M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 478(6):1156-1172. PubMed ID: 32324669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-Term Implant Survivorship and Modes of Failure in Simultaneous Concurrent Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Yong TM; Young EC; Molloy IB; Fisher BM; Keeney BJ; Moschetti WE
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jan; 35(1):139-144. PubMed ID: 31500911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term outcomes of primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty.
Cholewinski P; Putman S; Vasseur L; Migaud H; Duhamel A; Behal H; Pasquier G
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Jun; 101(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25952710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term results of revision total knee arthroplasty using a rotating hinge implant.
Wignadasan W; Chang JS; Kayani B; Kontoghiorghe C; Haddad FS
Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():72-80. PubMed ID: 33310668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Similar outcomes of constrained condylar knee and rotating hinge prosthesis in revision surgery for extension instability after primary total knee arthroplasty.
Miralles-Muñoz FA; Pineda-Salazar M; Rubio-Morales M; González-Parreño S; Ruiz-Lozano M; Lizaur-Utrilla A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2022 Dec; 108(8):103265. PubMed ID: 35257946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does a non-stemmed constrained condylar prosthesis predispose to early failure of primary total knee arthroplasty?
Deshmukh AJ; Rathod PA; Moses MJ; Snir N; Marwin SE; Dayan AJ
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Oct; 24(10):3194-3199. PubMed ID: 25552405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revision total knee arthroplasty for flexion instability : a concise follow-up of a previous report.
Hannon CP; Kruckeberg BM; Pagnano MW; Berry DJ; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2022 Oct; 104-B(10):1126-1131. PubMed ID: 36177638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term results (after a mean 11.3years, and up to 22years, of follow-up) of the Legacy Constrained Condylar Knee (LCCK™) in primary total knee arthroplasty.
Urbain A; Putman S; Migaud H; Pasquier G; Girard J; Dartus J
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2024 May; 110(3):103795. PubMed ID: 38081358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How do knee implants perform past the second decade? Nineteen- to 25-year followup of the Press-fit Condylar design TKA.
Patil S; McCauley JC; Pulido P; Colwell CW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 473(1):135-40. PubMed ID: 25082622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rotating-hinge prosthesis for aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: A multicentre retrospective study of 127 cases with a mean follow-up of five years.
Houfani F; Mainard D; Rubens-Duval B; Papin PE; Pasquier G; Ehlinger M;
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 May; 107(3):102855. PubMed ID: 33581278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hinged versus CCK revision arthroplasty for the stiff total knee.
Hermans K; Vandenneucker H; Truijen J; Oosterbosch J; Bellemans J
Knee; 2019 Jan; 26(1):222-227. PubMed ID: 30415974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty From a Specific, Now-Recalled Implant System.
Puri S; Chandi S; Chiu YF; Blevins JL; Westrich GH; Figgie MP; Sculco PK; Chalmers BP; Gausden EB
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jun; 38(6S):S290-S296.e1. PubMed ID: 36907386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term outcomes of one single-design varus valgus constrained versus one single-design rotating hinge in revision knee arthroplasty after over 10-year follow-up.
Sanz-Ruiz P; León-Román VE; Matas-Diez JA; Villanueva-Martínez M; Vaquero J
J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Mar; 17(1):135. PubMed ID: 35246182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High Rate of Re-Revision in Patients Less Than 55 Years of Age Undergoing Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Chalmers BP; Syku M; Joseph AD; Mayman DJ; Haas SB; Blevins JL
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jul; 36(7):2348-2352. PubMed ID: 33390338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
