90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3412547)
1. Dense renal papillae: a quantitative study using computed tomography.
Dixon AK; Ashford NS; Sherwood T
Nephron; 1988; 49(4):328-30. PubMed ID: 3412547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences in computed tomography density of the renal papillae of stone formers and non-stone-formers: a pilot study.
Eisner BH; Iqbal A; Namasivayam S; Catalano O; Kambadakone A; Dretler SP; Sahani DV
J Endourol; 2008 Oct; 22(10):2207-10. PubMed ID: 18831676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of Randall's plaque theory using unenhanced abdominal computed tomography.
Ciudin A; Luque Galvez MP; Salvador Izquierdo R; Diaconu MG; de Castro AF; Constantin V; Alvarez-Vijande JR; Nicolau C; Alcaraz Asensio A
Urology; 2013 Feb; 81(2):246-9. PubMed ID: 23374769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can Hounsfield unit values of the cortex and papillae determined by computed tomography demonstrate the possibility of kidney stone formation?
Baran I; Voyvoda N; Tokgöz Ö; Tokgöz H
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1446-9. PubMed ID: 21497033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hounsfield density of renal papillae in stone formers: analysis based on stone composition.
Deshmukh S; Kambadakone A; Sahani DV; Eisner BH
J Urol; 2015 May; 193(5):1560-3. PubMed ID: 25444988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Increased renal papillary density in kidney stone formers detectable by CT scan is a potential marker of stone risk, but is unrelated to underlying hypercalciuria.
Shavit L; Girfoglio D; Kirkham A; Allen D; Ferraro PM; Moochhala S; Unwin R
Urolithiasis; 2016 Oct; 44(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 27023714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The evolution of CT diagnosed papillae tip microcalcifications: can we predict the development of stones?
Ciudin A; Luque MP; Salvador R; Diaconu MG; Franco A; Collado-Belvis A; Sanchez J; Constantin V; Alvarez-Vijande R; Nicolau C; Alcaraz A
J Endourol; 2014 Aug; 28(8):1016-21. PubMed ID: 24735416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of hydration status on renal medulla attenuation on unenhanced CT scans.
Tublin ME; Tessler FN; McCauley TR; Kesack CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jan; 168(1):257-9. PubMed ID: 8976956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Renal papillary attenuation differences between primary and recurrent idiopathic calcium stone disease patients.
Cakiroglu B; Eyyupoglu SE; Tas T; Esen T; Acar O; Aksoy SH
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2014 Jun; 66(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 24988201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Physiology of renal medullary tip hyperattenuation at unenhanced CT: urinary specific gravity and the NaCl concentration gradient.
Hsu CT; Wang ZJ; Yu AS; Gould RG; Fu Y; Joe BN; Qayyum A; Breiman RS; Coakley FV; Yeh BM
Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 18305187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differentiation of renal neoplasms from high-density cysts: use of attenuation changes between the corticomedullary and nephrographic phases of computed tomography.
Zagoria RJ; Gasser T; Leyendecker JR; Bechtold RE; Dyer RB
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 17259831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. AUR Memorial Award 1990. The physiologic basis of the radiodense renal medulla after the administration of blood pool contrast agent PFOB.
Coley BD; Mattrey RF; Mitten RM; Peterson T
Invest Radiol; 1990 Dec; 25(12):1287-93. PubMed ID: 2279907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unenhanced computed tomography findings of renal papillae in patients with a ureteral stone.
Serter S; Sahin E; Yildirim UM; Arslan M; Karakose A
Clin Invest Med; 2016 Dec; 39(6):27518. PubMed ID: 27917808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiphasic helical CT of the kidney: increased conspicuity for detection and characterization of small (< 3-cm) renal masses.
Szolar DH; Kammerhuber F; Altziebler S; Tillich M; Breinl E; Fotter R; Schreyer HH
Radiology; 1997 Jan; 202(1):211-7. PubMed ID: 8988213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Renovascular CT: comparison between adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction.
Noda Y; Goshima S; Koyasu H; Shigeyama S; Miyoshi T; Kawada H; Kawai N; Matsuo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):901.e13-901.e19. PubMed ID: 28673448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Re: Effect of hydration status on renal medulla attenuation on unenhanced CT scans.
Lautin EM; Scheiner JE; Rozenblit A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Aug; 169(2):599. PubMed ID: 9242789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Solid Renal Cell Carcinoma Measuring Water Attenuation (-10 to 20 HU) on Unenhanced CT.
Schieda N; Vakili M; Dilauro M; Hodgdon T; Flood TA; Shabana WM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1215-21. PubMed ID: 26587928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can high-attenuation renal cysts be differentiated from renal cell carcinoma at unenhanced CT?
Jonisch AI; Rubinowitz AN; Mutalik PG; Israel GM
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):445-50. PubMed ID: 17456870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiphasic renal CT: comparison of renal mass enhancement during the corticomedullary and nephrographic phases.
Birnbaum BA; Jacobs JE; Ramchandani P
Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):753-8. PubMed ID: 8756927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An optimal contrast dose indicator for the determination of hepatic enhancement in abdominal multidetector computed tomography: comparison of patient attenuation indicator with total body weight and body mass index.
Li J; Udayasankar UK; Tang X; Carew J; Toth TL; Small WC
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(6):874-8. PubMed ID: 21084903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
