228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34126564)
1. Comparison of intravascular access methods applied by nurses wearing personal protective equipment in simulated COVID-19 resuscitation: A randomized crossover simulation trial.
Drozd A; Smereka J; Pruc M; Malysz M; Gasecka A; Sonmez LO; Cyran M; Konge L; Szarpak L
Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Nov; 49():189-194. PubMed ID: 34126564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of four different intraosseous access devices during simulated pediatric resuscitation. A randomized crossover manikin trial.
Bielski K; Szarpak L; Smereka J; Ladny JR; Leung S; Ruetzler K
Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Jul; 176(7):865-871. PubMed ID: 28500463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of intravenous and intraosseous access by pre-hospital medical emergency personnel with and without CBRN protective equipment.
Lamhaut L; Dagron C; Apriotesei R; Gouvernaire J; Elie C; Marx JS; Télion C; Vivien B; Carli P
Resuscitation; 2010 Jan; 81(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 19854554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Military Medic Performance with Employment of a Commercial Intraosseous Infusion Device: A Randomized, Crossover Study.
Gendron B; Cronin A; Monti J; Brigg A
Mil Med; 2018 May; 183(5-6):e216-e222. PubMed ID: 29420766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Two Intraosseous Devices: The NIO Versus the EZ-IO by Novice Users-A Randomized Cross Over Trial.
Shina A; Baruch EN; Shlaifer A; Shovali A; Levi M; Yosefy O; Segal D; Bader T; Shavit I; Yitzhak A
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2017; 21(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 27870553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 4 Pediatric Intraosseous Access Devices: A Randomized Simulation Study.
Szarpak L; Ladny JR; Dabrowski M; Ladny M; Smereka J; Ahuja S; Ruetzler K
Pediatr Emerg Care; 2020 Oct; 36(10):e568-e572. PubMed ID: 30106870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of three intraosseous access devices for resuscitation of term neonates: a randomised simulation study.
Keller A; Boukai A; Feldman O; Diamand R; Shavit I
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2022 May; 107(3):289-292. PubMed ID: 34340986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of two intraosseous access devices in adult patients under resuscitation in the emergency department: A prospective, randomized study.
Leidel BA; Kirchhoff C; Braunstein V; Bogner V; Biberthaler P; Kanz KG
Resuscitation; 2010 Aug; 81(8):994-9. PubMed ID: 20434823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Fluid Resuscitation Rate with and without External Pressure Using Two Intraosseous Infusion Systems for Adult Emergencies, the CITRIN (Comparison of InTRaosseous infusion systems in emergency medicINe)-Study.
Hammer N; Möbius R; Gries A; Hossfeld B; Bechmann I; Bernhard M
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0143726. PubMed ID: 26630579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraosseous devices: a randomized controlled trial comparing three intraosseous devices.
Hartholt KA; van Lieshout EM; Thies WC; Patka P; Schipper IB
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2010; 14(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 19947861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. IO versus IV access while wearing personal protective equipment in a HazMat scenario.
Suyama J; Knutsen CC; Northington WE; Hahn M; Hostler D
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2007; 11(4):467-72. PubMed ID: 17907035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Randomized Cadaver Study Comparing First-Attempt Success Between Tibial and Humeral Intraosseous Insertions Using NIO Device by Paramedics: A Preliminary Investigation.
Szarpak L; Truszewski Z; Smereka J; Krajewski P; Fudalej M; Adamczyk P; Czyzewski L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(20):e3724. PubMed ID: 27196493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraosseous access EZ-IO in a prehospital emergency service.
Torres F; Galán MD; Alonso Mdel M; Suárez R; Camacho C; Almagro V
J Emerg Nurs; 2013 Sep; 39(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 23099011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the NIO and T.A.L.O.N Intraosseous Devices as Placed by U.S. Army Conventional Force Combat Medics-A Randomized Crossover Study.
Lange P; Umar M; Walker JD; Riddle M; Mochmer P
Mil Med; 2022 Jul; 187(7-8):e877-e881. PubMed ID: 34327538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of the EZ-IO needle driver for out-of-hospital intraosseous access--a preliminary, observational, multicenter study.
Schalk R; Schweigkofler U; Lotz G; Zacharowski K; Latasch L; Byhahn C
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2011 Oct; 19():65. PubMed ID: 22029625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two mechanical intraosseous infusion devices: a pilot, randomized crossover trial.
Shavit I; Hoffmann Y; Galbraith R; Waisman Y
Resuscitation; 2009 Sep; 80(9):1029-33. PubMed ID: 19586701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of NIO and EZ-IO intraosseous access devices in adult patients under resuscitation performed by paramedics: a randomized crossover manikin trial.
Szarpak Ł; Czyzewski Ł; Woloszczuk-Gebicka B; Krajewski P; Fudalej M; Truszewski Z
Am J Emerg Med; 2016 Jun; 34(6):1166-7. PubMed ID: 27033737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraosseous versus intravenous access while wearing personal protective equipment: a meta-analysis in the era of COVID-19.
Drozd A; Smereka J; Filipiak KJ; Jaguszewski M; Ładny JR; Bielski K; Nadolny K; Ruetzler K; Szarpak Ł
Kardiol Pol; 2021 Mar; 79(3):277-286. PubMed ID: 33415967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Resuscitation of the patient with suspected/confirmed COVID-19 when wearing personal protective equipment: A randomized multicenter crossover simulation trial.
Malysz M; Dabrowski M; Böttiger BW; Smereka J; Kulak K; Szarpak A; Jaguszewski M; Filipiak KJ; Ladny JR; Ruetzler K; Szarpak L
Cardiol J; 2020; 27(5):497-506. PubMed ID: 32419128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EZ-IO(®) intraosseous device implementation in German Helicopter Emergency Medical Service.
Helm M; Haunstein B; Schlechtriemen T; Ruppert M; Lampl L; Gäßler M
Resuscitation; 2015 Mar; 88():43-7. PubMed ID: 25553609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
