These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34126573)

  • 1. Effects of load mass and position on the dynamic loading of the knees, shoulders and lumbar spine during lifting: a musculoskeletal modelling approach.
    Skals S; Bláfoss R; de Zee M; Andersen LL; Andersen MS
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Oct; 96():103491. PubMed ID: 34126573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical Assessment of the NIOSH Lifting Equation in Asymmetric Load-Handling Activities Using a Detailed Musculoskeletal Model.
    Behjati M; Arjmand N
    Hum Factors; 2019 Mar; 61(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 30222936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Manual material handling in the supermarket sector. Part 2: Knee, spine and shoulder joint reaction forces.
    Skals S; Bláfoss R; Andersen LL; Andersen MS; de Zee M
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Apr; 92():103345. PubMed ID: 33444883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of different lifting analysis tools in estimating lower spinal loads - Evaluation of NIOSH criterion.
    Ghezelbash F; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Arjmand N
    J Biomech; 2020 Nov; 112():110024. PubMed ID: 32961423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Recommended Weight Generates Different Spine Loads in Load-Handling Activity Performed Using Stoop, Semi-squat and Full-Squat Techniques; a Full-Body Musculoskeletal Model Study.
    Dehghan P; Arjmand N
    Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1387-1398. PubMed ID: 36433743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the asymmetry multiplier in the 1991 NIOSH lifting equation adequately control the biomechanical loading of the spine?
    Lavender SA; Li YC; Natarajan RN; Andersson GB
    Ergonomics; 2009 Jan; 52(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 19308820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading.
    Kingma I; Bosch T; Bruins L; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2004 Oct; 47(13):1365-85. PubMed ID: 15513714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive equations for lumbar spine loads in load-dependent asymmetric one- and two-handed lifting activities.
    Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Jul; 27(6):537-44. PubMed ID: 22265249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of initial horizontal weight placement on the loads at the lumbar spine while lifting.
    Schipplein OD; Reinsel TE; Andersson GB; Lavender SA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Sep; 20(17):1895-8. PubMed ID: 8560338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The load on the lumbar spine during asymmetrical bi-manual materials handling.
    Jäger M; Luttmann A
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):783-805. PubMed ID: 1633789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of different surfaces on biomechanical loading of shoulder and lumbar spine during pushing and pulling of two-wheeled containers.
    Laursen B; Schibye B
    Appl Ergon; 2002 Mar; 33(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 12009123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low back load in airport baggage handlers.
    Koblauch H
    Dan Med J; 2016 Apr; 63(4):. PubMed ID: 27034189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical analysis of different back-supporting exoskeletons regarding musculoskeletal loading during lifting and holding.
    Johns J; Schultes I; Heinrich K; Potthast W; Glitsch U
    J Biomech; 2024 May; 168():112125. PubMed ID: 38688184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of lumbar spine and muscle loading between male and female workers during box transfers.
    Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Larivière C
    J Biomech; 2018 Nov; 81():76-85. PubMed ID: 30286979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spine loading during the application and removal of lifting slings: the effects of patient weight, bed height and work method.
    Nagavarapu S; Lavender SA; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2017 May; 60(5):636-648. PubMed ID: 27400731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of lumbar spinal loading and trunk muscle forces during asymmetric lifting tasks: application of whole-body musculoskeletal modelling in OpenSim.
    Kim HK; Zhang Y
    Ergonomics; 2017 Apr; 60(4):563-576. PubMed ID: 27194401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating lumbar spine loading when using back-support exoskeletons in lifting tasks.
    Madinei S; Nussbaum MA
    J Biomech; 2023 Jan; 147():111439. PubMed ID: 36638578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identifying interactive effects of task demands in lifting on estimates of in vivo low back joint loads.
    Gooyers CE; Beach TAC; Frost DM; Howarth SJ; Callaghan JP
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Feb; 67():203-210. PubMed ID: 29122191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of the NIOSH Lifting Equation: a psychophysical and biomechanical investigation.
    Elfeituri FE; Taboun SM
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2002; 8(2):243-58. PubMed ID: 12067513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of changes in the lumbar posture in lifting on trunk muscle and spinal loads: A combined in vivo, musculoskeletal, and finite element model study.
    Khoddam-Khorasani P; Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A
    J Biomech; 2020 May; 104():109728. PubMed ID: 32147242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.