These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34126573)

  • 21. Estimating Compressive and Shear Forces at L5-S1: Exploring the Effects of Load Weight, Asymmetry, and Height Using Optical and Inertial Motion Capture Systems.
    Nail-Ulloa I; Zabala M; Sesek R; Chen H; Schall MC; Gallagher S
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Mar; 24(6):. PubMed ID: 38544203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Subject-specific regression equations to estimate lower spinal loads during symmetric and asymmetric static lifting.
    Ghezelbash F; Shirazi-Adl A; El Ouaaid Z; Plamondon A; Arjmand N
    J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 102():109550. PubMed ID: 31932024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):687-99. PubMed ID: 17103232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A biomechanical analysis of manual lifting tasks performed in restricted workspaces.
    Elfeituri FE
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2001; 7(3):333-46. PubMed ID: 11543701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimation of Lumbar Spine Loading of Low Back Pain Participant During Lifting Using an Open Source Musculoskeletal Model.
    Manoharan P; Pranata A; Tse KM; Chai R
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38083103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In vivo load on knee, hip and spine during manual materials handling with two lifting techniques.
    Bender A; Schmidt H; Wellner DL; Duda GN; Brandl C; Damm P
    J Biomech; 2024 Jan; 163():111963. PubMed ID: 38286711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Severe obesity effect on low back biomechanical stress of manual load lifting.
    Singh D; Park W; Hwang D; Levy MS
    Work; 2015 Jun; 51(2):337-48. PubMed ID: 25248524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A braced arm-to-thigh (BATT) lifting technique reduces lumbar spine loads in healthy and low back pain participants.
    Beaucage-Gauvreau E; Brandon SCE; Robertson WSP; Fraser R; Freeman BJC; Graham RB; Thewlis D; Jones CF
    J Biomech; 2020 Feb; 100():109584. PubMed ID: 31898975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spine loading as a function of gender.
    Marras WS; Davis KG; Jorgensen M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(22):2514-20. PubMed ID: 12435984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Unilateral ankle immobilization alters the kinematics and kinetics of lifting.
    Beach TA; Frost DM; Clark JM; Maly MR; Callaghan JP
    Work; 2014; 47(2):221-34. PubMed ID: 23324721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of dynamic factors on triaxial net muscular moments at the L5/S1 joint during asymmetrical lifting and lowering.
    Gagnon D; Gagnon M
    J Biomech; 1992 Aug; 25(8):891-901. PubMed ID: 1639833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Relative performances of artificial neural network and regression mapping tools in evaluation of spinal loads and muscle forces during static lifting.
    Arjmand N; Ekrami O; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Parnianpour M
    J Biomech; 2013 May; 46(8):1454-62. PubMed ID: 23541615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The assessment of material handling strategies in dealing with sudden loading: the effects of load handling position on trunk biomechanics.
    Ning X; Zhou J; Dai B; Jaridi M
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Nov; 45(6):1399-405. PubMed ID: 24766903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. One versus two-handed lifting and lowering: lumbar spine loads and recommended one-handed limits protecting the lower back.
    Weston EB; Aurand AM; Dufour JS; Knapik GG; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2020 Apr; 63(4):505-521. PubMed ID: 32024437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Strategies of load tilts and shoulders positioning in asymmetrical lifting. A concomitant evaluation of the reference systems of axes.
    Gagnon M; Larrivé A; Desjardins P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2000 Aug; 15(7):478-88. PubMed ID: 10831807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Lumbar Facet Joint Kinematics and Load Effects During Dynamic Lifting.
    Chowdhury SK; Byrne RM; Zhou Y; Zhang X
    Hum Factors; 2018 Dec; 60(8):1130-1145. PubMed ID: 30074402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does team lifting increase the variability in peak lumbar compression in ironworkers?
    Faber G; Visser S; van der Molen HF; Kuijer PP; Hoozemans MJ; Van Dieën JH; Frings-Dresen MH
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4171-3. PubMed ID: 22317361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A Biomechanical Waist Comfort Model for Manual Material Lifting.
    Zhang Y; Ke J; Wu X; Luo X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(16):. PubMed ID: 32824371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Estimation of Spinal Loading During Manual Materials Handling Using Inertial Motion Capture.
    Larsen FG; Svenningsen FP; Andersen MS; de Zee M; Skals S
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2020 Feb; 48(2):805-821. PubMed ID: 31748833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effectiveness of a vacuum lifting system in reducing spinal load during airline baggage handling.
    Lu ML; Dufour JS; Weston EB; Marras WS
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():247-252. PubMed ID: 29866315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.