BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34127040)

  • 1. Short-term effects of synchronized vs. non-synchronized NIPPV in preterm infants: study protocol for an unmasked randomized crossover trial.
    Cresi F; Chiale F; Maggiora E; Borgione SM; Ferroglio M; Runfola F; Maiocco G; Peila C; Bertino E; Coscia A
    Trials; 2021 Jun; 22(1):392. PubMed ID: 34127040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Diaphragmatic Initiated Ventilatory Assist (DIVA) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing rates of extubation failure in extremely premature infants undergoing extubation to non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist versus non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation.
    Matlock DN; Ratcliffe SJ; Courtney SE; Kirpalani H; Firestone K; Stein H; Dysart K; Warren K; Goldstein MR; Lund KC; Natarajan A; Demissie E; Foglia EE
    Trials; 2024 Mar; 25(1):201. PubMed ID: 38509583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is synchronised NIPPV more effective than NIPPV and NCPAP in treating apnoea of prematurity (AOP)? A randomised cross-over trial.
    Gizzi C; Montecchia F; Panetta V; Castellano C; Mariani C; Campelli M; Papoff P; Moretti C; Agostino R
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2015 Jan; 100(1):F17-23. PubMed ID: 25318667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multicenter, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial, comparing nasal continuous positive airway pressure with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as primary support before minimally invasive surfactant administration for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (the NIV-MISA-RDS trial): Study protocol.
    Zhang H; Li J; Zeng L; Gao Y; Zhao W; Han T; Tong X
    Front Pediatr; 2022; 10():968462. PubMed ID: 35967549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.
    Lemyre B; Davis PG; De Paoli AG; Kirpalani H
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Sep; (9):CD003212. PubMed ID: 25188554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective, randomized, controlled study of NIPPV versus nCPAP in preterm and term infants with respiratory distress syndrome.
    Shi Y; Tang S; Zhao J; Shen J
    Pediatr Pulmonol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):673-8. PubMed ID: 24039148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as primary respiratory support in infants of ≥ 32 weeks gestational age (GA): study protocol for a three-arm multi-center randomized controlled trial.
    Zhou R; Xiong T; Tang J; Huang Y; Liu W; Zhu J; Chen C; Gong L; Tian K; Wang A; Mu D
    Trials; 2023 Oct; 24(1):647. PubMed ID: 37803402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized Controlled Trial of Nonsynchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Nasal CPAP after Extubation of VLBW Infants.
    Estay AS; Mariani GL; Alvarez CA; Milet B; Agost D; Avila CP; Roldan L; Abdala DA; Keller R; Galletti MF; González A;
    Neonatology; 2020; 117(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 32388511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation vs Noninvasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation as Support After Extubation of Neonates Born Extremely Preterm or With More Severe Respiratory Failure: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Zhu X; Li F; Shi Y; Feng Z; De Luca D;
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e2321644. PubMed ID: 37399009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: Study protocol for a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Zhu XW; Shi Y; Shi LP; Liu L; Xue J; Ramanathan R;
    Trials; 2018 Jun; 19(1):319. PubMed ID: 29898763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.
    Davis PG; Lemyre B; de Paoli AG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (3):CD003212. PubMed ID: 11687052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Synchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation.
    Moretti C; Gizzi C
    Clin Perinatol; 2021 Dec; 48(4):745-759. PubMed ID: 34774207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cardiorespiratory effects of NIV-NAVA, NIPPV, and NCPAP shortly after extubation in extremely preterm infants: A randomized crossover trial.
    Latremouille S; Bhuller M; Shalish W; Sant'Anna G
    Pediatr Pulmonol; 2021 Oct; 56(10):3273-3282. PubMed ID: 34379891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noninvasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation vs Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation as Postextubation Support for Preterm Neonates in China: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Zhu X; Qi H; Feng Z; Shi Y; De Luca D;
    JAMA Pediatr; 2022 Jun; 176(6):551-559. PubMed ID: 35467744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation.
    Khalaf MN; Brodsky N; Hurley J; Bhandari V
    Pediatrics; 2001 Jul; 108(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 11433048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized pilot study comparing heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae with NIPPV for RDS.
    Kugelman A; Riskin A; Said W; Shoris I; Mor F; Bader D
    Pediatr Pulmonol; 2015 Jun; 50(6):576-83. PubMed ID: 24619945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for apnea of prematurity.
    Lemyre B; Davis PG; De Paoli AG
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (3):CD002272. PubMed ID: 10908544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.
    Jasani B; Nanavati R; Kabra N; Rajdeo S; Bhandari V
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(10):1546-51. PubMed ID: 26135774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enteral Nutrition Tolerance And REspiratory Support (ENTARES) Study in preterm infants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Cresi F; Maggiora E; Borgione SM; Spada E; Coscia A; Bertino E; Meneghin F; Corvaglia LT; Ventura ML; Lista G;
    Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):67. PubMed ID: 30658676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis and up-date.
    Li W; Long C; Zhangxue H; Jinning Z; Shifang T; Juan M; Renjun L; Yuan S
    Pediatr Pulmonol; 2015 Apr; 50(4):402-9. PubMed ID: 25418007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.