These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34128582)

  • 1. Why do males emerge before females? Sexual size dimorphism drives sexual bimaturism in insects.
    Teder T; Kaasik A; Taits K; Tammaru T
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2021 Dec; 96(6):2461-2475. PubMed ID: 34128582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sex-related variation in migration phenology in relation to sexual dimorphism: a test of competing hypotheses for the evolution of protandry.
    Saino N; Rubolini D; Serra L; Caprioli M; Morganti M; Ambrosini R; Spina F
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Oct; 23(10):2054-2065. PubMed ID: 20722895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sexually dimorphic body size and development time plasticity in
    Wormington JD; Juliano SA
    Evol Ecol Res; 2014; 16():223-234. PubMed ID: 25663826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proximate causes of Rensch's rule: does sexual size dimorphism in arthropods result from sex differences in development time?
    Blanckenhorn WU; Dixon AF; Fairbairn DJ; Foellmer MW; Gibert P; van der Linde K; Meier R; Nylin S; Pitnick S; Schoff C; Signorelli M; Teder T; Wiklund C
    Am Nat; 2007 Feb; 169(2):245-57. PubMed ID: 17211807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Potential constraints on evolution: sexual dimorphism and the problem of protandry in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana.
    Zwaan BJ; Zijlstra WG; Keller M; Pijpe J; Brakefield PM
    J Genet; 2008 Dec; 87(4):395-405. PubMed ID: 19147929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why do female migratory birds arrive later than males?
    Kokko H; Gunnarsson TG; Morrell LJ; Gill JA
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Nov; 75(6):1293-303. PubMed ID: 17032361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Field evidence challenges the often-presumed relationship between early male maturation and female-biased sexual size dimorphism.
    Chelini MC; Hebets E
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Nov; 7(22):9592-9601. PubMed ID: 29187992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
    Bonduriansky R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex differences in phenotypic plasticity affect variation in sexual size dimorphism in insects: from physiology to evolution.
    Stillwell RC; Blanckenhorn WU; Teder T; Davidowitz G; Fox CW
    Annu Rev Entomol; 2010; 55():227-45. PubMed ID: 19728836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revisiting niche divergence hypothesis in sexually dimorphic birds: Is diet overlap correlated with sexual size dimorphism?
    Bravo C; Bautista-Sopelana LM; Alonso JC
    J Anim Ecol; 2024 Apr; 93(4):460-474. PubMed ID: 38462717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual selection on male size drives the evolution of male-biased sexual size dimorphism via the prolongation of male development.
    Rohner PT; Blanckenhorn WU; Puniamoorthy N
    Evolution; 2016 Jun; 70(6):1189-99. PubMed ID: 27168489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanisms causing variation in sexual size dimorphism in three sympatric, congeneric lizards.
    Manicom C; Alford R; Schoener TW; Schwarzkopf L
    Ecology; 2014 Jun; 95(6):1531-44. PubMed ID: 25039218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ecological drivers of body size evolution and sexual size dimorphism in short-horned grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae).
    García-Navas V; Noguerales V; Cordero PJ; Ortego J
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Aug; 30(8):1592-1608. PubMed ID: 28609564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual conflict and environmental change: trade-offs within and between the sexes during the evolution of desiccation resistance.
    Kwan L; Bedhomme S; Prasad NG; Chippindale AK
    J Genet; 2008 Dec; 87(4):383-94. PubMed ID: 19147928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Introducing the refined gravity hypothesis of extreme sexual size dimorphism.
    Corcobado G; Rodríguez-Gironés MA; De Mas E; Moya-Laraño J
    BMC Evol Biol; 2010 Aug; 10():236. PubMed ID: 20682029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The eunuch phenomenon: adaptive evolution of genital emasculation in sexually dimorphic spiders.
    Kuntner M; Agnarsson I; Li D
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2015 Feb; 90(1):279-96. PubMed ID: 24809822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex-biased phenotypic plasticity affects sexual dimorphism patterns under changing environmental conditions.
    Cordeschi G; Canestrelli D; Porretta D
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):892. PubMed ID: 38195624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Body Size, Fecundity, and Sexual Size Dimorphism in the Neotropical Cricket Macroanaxipha macilenta (Saussure) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae).
    Cueva Del Castillo R
    Neotrop Entomol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 26013128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Andrew meets Rensch: sexual size dimorphism and the inverse of Rensch's rule in Andrew's toad (Bufo andrewsi).
    Liao WB; Liu WC; Merilä J
    Oecologia; 2015 Feb; 177(2):389-99. PubMed ID: 25407623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Size-dependent selective mechanisms on males and females and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in frogs.
    Nali RC; Zamudio KR; Haddad CF; Prado CP
    Am Nat; 2014 Dec; 184(6):727-40. PubMed ID: 25438173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.