BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34129100)

  • 1. Parameter estimation in fluorescence recovery after photobleaching: quantitative analysis of protein binding reactions and diffusion.
    Williamson DE; Sahai E; Jenkins RP; O'Dea RD; King JR
    J Math Biol; 2021 Jun; 83(1):1. PubMed ID: 34129100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DeepFRAP: Fast fluorescence recovery after photobleaching data analysis using deep neural networks.
    Wåhlstrand Skärström V; Krona A; Lorén N; Röding M
    J Microsc; 2021 May; 282(2):146-161. PubMed ID: 33247838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving Parameter Inference from FRAP Data: an Analysis Motivated by Pattern Formation in the Drosophila Wing Disc.
    Lin L; Othmer HG
    Bull Math Biol; 2017 Mar; 79(3):448-497. PubMed ID: 28101740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A generalization of theory for two-dimensional fluorescence recovery after photobleaching applicable to confocal laser scanning microscopes.
    Kang M; Day CA; Drake K; Kenworthy AK; DiBenedetto E
    Biophys J; 2009 Sep; 97(5):1501-11. PubMed ID: 19720039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parameter Identifiability in PDE Models of Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching.
    Ciocanel MV; Ding L; Mastromatteo L; Reichheld S; Cabral S; Mowry K; Sandstede B
    Bull Math Biol; 2024 Mar; 86(4):36. PubMed ID: 38430382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inference of protein kinetics by stochastic modeling and simulation of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching experiments.
    Rapsomaniki MA; Cinquemani E; Giakoumakis NN; Kotsantis P; Lygeros J; Lygerou Z
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 31(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 25273108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of biomolecule mass transport and binding rate parameters in living cells by inverse modeling.
    Sadegh Zadeh K; Montas HJ; Shirmohammadi A
    Theor Biol Med Model; 2006 Oct; 3():36. PubMed ID: 17034642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving parameter estimation for cell surface FRAP data.
    Dushek O; Coombs D
    J Biochem Biophys Methods; 2008 Apr; 70(6):1224-31. PubMed ID: 17707082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single- and two-photon fluorescence recovery after photobleaching.
    Sullivan KD; Majewska AK; Brown EB
    Cold Spring Harb Protoc; 2015 Jan; 2015(1):pdb.top083519. PubMed ID: 25561627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A quantitative approach to analyze binding diffusion kinetics by confocal FRAP.
    Kang M; Day CA; DiBenedetto E; Kenworthy AK
    Biophys J; 2010 Nov; 99(9):2737-47. PubMed ID: 21044570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of Protein Kinetics Using Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP).
    Giakoumakis NN; Rapsomaniki MA; Lygerou Z
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1563():243-267. PubMed ID: 28324613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of membrane-localized binding kinetics with FRAP.
    Dushek O; Das R; Coombs D
    Eur Biophys J; 2008 Jun; 37(5):627-38. PubMed ID: 18299825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A mathematical model of actin filament turnover for fitting FRAP data.
    Halavatyi AA; Nazarov PV; Al Tanoury Z; Apanasovich VV; Yatskou M; Friederich E
    Eur Biophys J; 2010 Mar; 39(4):669-77. PubMed ID: 19921173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inferences from FRAP data are model dependent: A subdiffusive analysis.
    Alexander AM; Lawley SD
    Biophys J; 2022 Oct; 121(20):3795-3810. PubMed ID: 36127879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiphoton fluorescence recovery after photobleaching in bounded systems.
    Sullivan KD; Brown EB
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2011 May; 83(5 Pt 1):051916. PubMed ID: 21728580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of protein and lipid dynamics using confocal fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP).
    Day CA; Kraft LJ; Kang M; Kenworthy AK
    Curr Protoc Cytom; 2012 Oct; Chapter 2():Unit2.19. PubMed ID: 23042527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of binding mechanisms of nuclear proteins using confocal scanning laser microscopy and FRAP.
    Tsibidis GD; Ripoll J
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Aug; 253(4):755-68. PubMed ID: 18538796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cytoplasmic viscosity near the cell plasma membrane: translational diffusion of a small fluorescent solute measured by total internal reflection-fluorescence photobleaching recovery.
    Swaminathan R; Bicknese S; Periasamy N; Verkman AS
    Biophys J; 1996 Aug; 71(2):1140-51. PubMed ID: 8842251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Challenges and artifacts in quantitative photobleaching experiments.
    Weiss M
    Traffic; 2004 Sep; 5(9):662-71. PubMed ID: 15296491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel computational framework for D(t) from Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching data reveals various anomalous diffusion types in live cell membranes.
    Kang M; Day CA; Kenworthy AK
    Traffic; 2019 Nov; 20(11):867-880. PubMed ID: 31452286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.