These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34129100)
21. Analysis of Active Transport by Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching. Ciocanel MV; Kreiling JA; Gagnon JA; Mowry KL; Sandstede B Biophys J; 2017 Apr; 112(8):1714-1725. PubMed ID: 28445762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diffusion measurements inside biofilms by image-based fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis with a commercial confocal laser scanning microscope. Waharte F; Steenkeste K; Briandet R; Fontaine-Aupart MP Appl Environ Microbiol; 2010 Sep; 76(17):5860-9. PubMed ID: 20639359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Validation of Normalizations, Scaling, and Photofading Corrections for FRAP Data Analysis. Kang M; Andreani M; Kenworthy AK PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0127966. PubMed ID: 26017223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A Highly Accurate Pixel-Based FRAP Model Based on Spectral-Domain Numerical Methods. Röding M; Lacroix L; Krona A; Gebäck T; Lorén N Biophys J; 2019 Apr; 116(7):1348-1361. PubMed ID: 30878198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Expanding the scope of quantitative FRAP analysis. Hallen MA; Layton AT J Theor Biol; 2010 Jan; 262(2):295-305. PubMed ID: 19836405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Role of three-dimensional bleach distribution in confocal and two-photon fluorescence recovery after photobleaching experiments. Mazza D; Cella F; Vicidomini G; Krol S; Diaspro A Appl Opt; 2007 Oct; 46(30):7401-11. PubMed ID: 17952174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Proposal of a set of model polymer additives designed for confocal FRAP diffusion experiments. Pinte J; Joly C; Plé K; Dole P; Feigenbaum A J Agric Food Chem; 2008 Nov; 56(21):10003-11. PubMed ID: 18928296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Recent applications of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to membrane bio-macromolecules. Rayan G; Guet JE; Taulier N; Pincet F; Urbach W Sensors (Basel); 2010; 10(6):5927-48. PubMed ID: 22219695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Anomalous photobleaching in fluorescence recovery after photobleaching measurements due to excitation saturation--a case study for fluorescein. Braeckmans K; Stubbe BG; Remaut K; Demeester J; De Smedt SC J Biomed Opt; 2006; 11(4):044013. PubMed ID: 16965170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Analysis of binding reactions by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Sprague BL; Pego RL; Stavreva DA; McNally JG Biophys J; 2004 Jun; 86(6):3473-95. PubMed ID: 15189848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Computation of FRAP recovery times for linker histone - chromatin binding on the basis of Brownian dynamics simulations. Öztürk MA; Wade RC Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj; 2020 Oct; 1864(10):129653. PubMed ID: 32512172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Rectangle FRAP for measuring diffusion with a laser scanning microscope. Xiong R; Deschout H; Demeester J; De Smedt SC; Braeckmans K Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1076():433-41. PubMed ID: 24108637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A closed-form analytic expression for FRAP formula for the binding diffusion model. Kang M; Kenworthy AK Biophys J; 2008 Jul; 95(2):L13-5. PubMed ID: 18487305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Parameter importance in FRAP acquisition and analysis: a simulation approach. Mai J; Trump S; Lehmann I; Attinger S Biophys J; 2013 May; 104(9):2089-97. PubMed ID: 23663852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]