These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34130043)

  • 1. Evaluating DNA evidence possibly involving multiple (mixed) samples, common donors and related contributors.
    Kruijver M; Taylor D; Bright JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Sep; 54():102532. PubMed ID: 34130043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Casework applications of probabilistic genotyping methods for DNA mixtures that allow relationships between contributors.
    Green PJ; Mortera J; Prieto L
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102482. PubMed ID: 33640736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Addressing uncertain assumptions in DNA evidence evaluation.
    Kruijver M; Kelly H; Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Sep; 66():102913. PubMed ID: 37453205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An Investigation into Compound Likelihood Ratios for Forensic DNA Mixtures.
    Wivell R; Kelly H; Kokoszka J; Daniels J; Dickson L; Buckleton J; Bright JA
    Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The analogy between DNA kinship and DNA mixture evaluation, with applications for the interpretation of likelihood ratios produced by possibly imperfect models.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102449. PubMed ID: 33517022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
    Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A large-scale validation of NOCIt's a posteriori probability of the number of contributors and its integration into forensic interpretation pipelines.
    Grgicak CM; Karkar S; Yearwood-Garcia X; Alfonse LE; Duffy KR; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102296. PubMed ID: 32339916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strategies for pairwise searches in forensic kinship analysis.
    Brustad HK; Colucci M; Jobling MA; Sheehan NA; Egeland T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Sep; 54():102562. PubMed ID: 34274795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions: Part I: evaluation of DNA profiling comparisons given (sub-) source propositions.
    Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():189-202. PubMed ID: 30041098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A mixed DNA profile controversy revisited.
    Kalafut T; Pugh S; Gill P; Abbas S; Semaan M; Mansour I; Curran J; Bright JA; Hicks T; Wivell R; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jan; 67(1):128-135. PubMed ID: 34651300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Yara Gambirasio case: Combining evidence in a complex DNA mixture case.
    Graversen T; Mortera J; Lago G
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():52-63. PubMed ID: 30776772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Utility of ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit in the research of pairwise 2nd-degree kinship identification.
    Xu M; Du Q; Ma G; Chen Z; Liu Q; Fu L; Cong B; Li S
    Int J Legal Med; 2019 Nov; 133(6):1641-1650. PubMed ID: 30687898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pedigree-based relationship inference from complex DNA mixtures.
    Dørum G; Kaur N; Gysi M
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 May; 131(3):629-641. PubMed ID: 28101646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When evaluating DNA evidence within a likelihood ratio framework, should the propositions be exhaustive?
    Buckleton J; Taylor D; Bright JA; Hicks T; Curran J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jan; 50():102406. PubMed ID: 33142191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Probabilistic Genotyping Software STRmix: Utility and Evidence for its Validity.
    Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Gittelson S; Moretti TR; Onorato AJ; Bieber FR; Budowle B; Taylor DA
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):393-405. PubMed ID: 30132900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pairwise kinship testing with microhaplotypes: Can advancements be made in kinship inference with these markers?
    Wu R; Chen H; Li R; Zang Y; Shen X; Hao B; Wang Q; Sun H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Aug; 325():110875. PubMed ID: 34166816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods and Research Hotspots of Forensic Kinship Testing.
    Li R; Sun HY
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 39(3):231-239. PubMed ID: 37517010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing multiple POI to DNA mixtures.
    Hicks T; Kerr Z; Pugh S; Bright JA; Curran J; Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102481. PubMed ID: 33607394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Streamlining the decision-making process for international DNA kinship matching using Worldwide allele frequencies and tailored cutoff log
    Laurent FX; Fischer A; Oldt RF; Kanthaswamy S; Buckleton JS; Hitchin S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Mar; 57():102634. PubMed ID: 34871915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG): Guidelines on the use of X-STRs in kinship analysis.
    Tillmar AO; Kling D; Butler JM; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Egeland T; Gusmão L
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():269-275. PubMed ID: 28544956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.