These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34130043)

  • 21. Identification of missing persons through kinship analysis by microhaplotype sequencing of single-source DNA and two-person DNA mixtures.
    Bai Z; Zhang N; Liu J; Ding H; Zhang Y; Wang T; Gao J; Ou X
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 May; 58():102689. PubMed ID: 35316721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Artificially intelligent scoring and classification engine for forensic identification.
    Siino V; Sears C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102162. PubMed ID: 31604203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Weight-of-evidence for DNA identification of missing persons and human remains using CODIS.
    Starinsky-Elbaz S; Ram T; Voskoboinik L; Pasternak Z
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2020 Sep; 16(3):389-394. PubMed ID: 32394209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Object-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensic DNA profiling problems.
    Dawid AP; Mortera J; Vicard P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jul; 169(2-3):195-205. PubMed ID: 17055679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The efficacy of DNA mixture to mixture matching.
    Bright JA; Taylor D; Kerr Z; Buckleton J; Kruijver M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():64-71. PubMed ID: 30986620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Combining evidence across multiple mixed DNA profiles for improved resolution of a donor when a common contributor can be assumed.
    Taylor D; Kruijver M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Nov; 49():102375. PubMed ID: 32937256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mixtures with relatives and linked markers.
    Dørum G; Kling D; Tillmar A; Vigeland MD; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 May; 130(3):621-34. PubMed ID: 26614310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. EuroForMix: An open source software based on a continuous model to evaluate STR DNA profiles from a mixture of contributors with artefacts.
    Bleka Ø; Storvik G; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():35-44. PubMed ID: 26720812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
    Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Models and implementation for relationship problems with dropout.
    Dørum G; Kling D; Baeza-Richer C; García-Magariños M; Sæbø S; Desmyter S; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2015 May; 129(3):411-23. PubMed ID: 25108449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Lab Retriever: a software tool for calculating likelihood ratios incorporating a probability of drop-out for forensic DNA profiles.
    Inman K; Rudin N; Cheng K; Robinson C; Kirschner A; Inman-Semerau L; Lohmueller KE
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 16():298. PubMed ID: 26384762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Four model variants within a continuous forensic DNA mixture interpretation framework: Effects on evidential inference and reporting.
    Swaminathan H; Qureshi MO; Grgicak CM; Duffy K; Lun DS
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207599. PubMed ID: 30458020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. DNA kinship analysis of unidentified human remains that led to a murder investigation.
    Starinsky-Elbaz S; Ariel T; Issan Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():e20-e23. PubMed ID: 31006546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development and validation of open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation based on a quantitative continuous model.
    Manabe S; Morimoto C; Hamano Y; Fujimoto S; Tamaki K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188183. PubMed ID: 29149210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluating DNA Mixtures with Contributors from Different Populations Using Probabilistic Genotyping.
    Kruijver M; Kelly H; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 36672780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Validation of probabilistic genotyping software for use in forensic DNA casework: Definitions and illustrations.
    Haned H; Gill P; Lohmueller K; Inman K; Rudin N
    Sci Justice; 2016 Mar; 56(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 26976468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method.
    Biedermann A; Bozza S; Konis K; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 22534257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The interpretation of mixed DNA profiles from a mother, father, and child trio.
    Lin MH; Bright JA; Pugh SN; Buckleton JS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102175. PubMed ID: 31644964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The importance of considering common sources of unknown DNA when evaluating findings given activity level propositions.
    Taylor D; Volgin L; Kokshoorn B; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102518. PubMed ID: 33865097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Likelihood ratio and posterior odds in forensic genetics: Two sides of the same coin.
    Caliebe A; Walsh S; Liu F; Kayser M; Krawczak M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 May; 28():203-210. PubMed ID: 28314239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.