These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34130077)

  • 1. Techno-economic study for a gasification plant processing residues of sewage sludge and solid recovered fuels.
    Alves O; Calado L; Panizio RM; Gonçalves M; Monteiro E; Brito P
    Waste Manag; 2021 Jul; 131():148-162. PubMed ID: 34130077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Techno-economic analysis of wastewater sludge gasification: a decentralized urban perspective.
    Lumley NP; Ramey DF; Prieto AL; Braun RJ; Cath TY; Porter JM
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Jun; 161():385-94. PubMed ID: 24727699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the co-gasification of sewage sludge and food wastes and cost-benefit analysis of gasification- and incineration-based waste treatment schemes.
    You S; Wang W; Dai Y; Tong YW; Wang CH
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Oct; 218():595-605. PubMed ID: 27416510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental and economic sustainability of poultry litter gasification for electricity and heat generation.
    Jeswani HK; Whiting A; Martin A; Azapagic A
    Waste Manag; 2019 Jul; 95():182-191. PubMed ID: 31351603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modelling and techno-economic assessment of possible pathways from sewage sludge to green energy in India.
    Vidyarthi PK; Arora P; Blond N; Ponche JL
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Aug; 366():121856. PubMed ID: 39032256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of phosphorus recovery from incineration and gasification sewage sludge ash.
    Parés Viader R; Jensen PE; Ottosen LM; Thomsen TP; Ahrenfeldt J; Hauggaard-Nielsen H
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Mar; 75(5-6):1251-1260. PubMed ID: 28272054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Co-gasification of solid waste and lignite - a case study for Western Macedonia.
    Koukouzas N; Katsiadakis A; Karlopoulos E; Kakaras E
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(7):1263-75. PubMed ID: 17631995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A review of technologies and performances of thermal treatment systems for energy recovery from waste.
    Lombardi L; Carnevale E; Corti A
    Waste Manag; 2015 Mar; 37():26-44. PubMed ID: 25535103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative assessment of municipal sewage sludge incineration, gasification and pyrolysis for a sustainable sludge-to-energy management in Greece.
    Samolada MC; Zabaniotou AA
    Waste Manag; 2014 Feb; 34(2):411-20. PubMed ID: 24290971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Life cycle assessment of sewage sludge co-incineration in a coal-based power station.
    Hong J; Xu C; Hong J; Tan X; Chen W
    Waste Manag; 2013 Sep; 33(9):1843-52. PubMed ID: 23777667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental study on gasification of oil sludge with steam and its char characteristic.
    Chu Z; Gong Z; Wang Z; Zhang H; Liu L; Wu J; Wang J
    J Hazard Mater; 2021 Aug; 416():125713. PubMed ID: 34492773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Techno-economic assessment of hydrotreated vegetable oil as a renewable fuel from waste sludge palm oil.
    Hor CJ; Tan YH; Mubarak NM; Tan IS; Ibrahim ML; Yek PNY; Karri RR; Khalid M
    Environ Res; 2023 Mar; 220():115169. PubMed ID: 36587722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environmental, energy, and economic impact assessment of sludge management alternatives based on incineration.
    Xiao H; Li K; Zhang D; Tang Z; Niu X; Yi L; Lin Z; Fu M
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Nov; 321():115848. PubMed ID: 35987051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unlocking the techno-economic potential of biomass gasification for power generation: Comparative analysis across diverse plant capacities.
    Kamaruzaman N; Kansha Y; Abbas A; Abdul Manaf N
    Waste Manag; 2024 Dec; 189():219-229. PubMed ID: 39216364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the environmental sustainability of different waste-to-energy plant configurations.
    Lombardi L; Carnevale EA
    Waste Manag; 2018 Mar; 73():232-246. PubMed ID: 28728789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screw pyrolysis technology for sewage sludge treatment.
    Tomasi Morgano M; Leibold H; Richter F; Stapf D; Seifert H
    Waste Manag; 2018 Mar; 73():487-495. PubMed ID: 28601579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Energy recovery from thermal treatment of dewatered sludge in wastewater treatment plants.
    Yang Q; Dussan K; Monaghan RF; Zhan X
    Water Sci Technol; 2016; 74(3):672-80. PubMed ID: 27508372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmental and economic performance of plasma gasification in Enhanced Landfill Mining.
    Danthurebandara M; Van Passel S; Vanderreydt I; Van Acker K
    Waste Manag; 2015 Nov; 45():458-67. PubMed ID: 26119012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomass fuel production from cellulosic sludge through biodrying: Aeration strategies, quality of end-products, gaseous emissions and techno-economic assessment.
    Guerra-Gorostegi N; González D; Puyuelo B; Ovejero J; Colón J; Gabriel D; Sánchez A; Ponsá S
    Waste Manag; 2021 May; 126():487-496. PubMed ID: 33838388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Review of inventory data for the thermal treatment of sewage sludge.
    Chang H; Zhao Y; Zhao S; Damgaard A; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag; 2022 Jun; 146():106-118. PubMed ID: 35588648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.