143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34136427)
1. Mammography with a fully automated breast volumetric software as a novel method for estimating the preoperative breast volume prior to mastectomy.
Kim JS; Bae K; Lee EJ; Bang M
Ann Surg Treat Res; 2021 Jun; 100(6):313-319. PubMed ID: 34136427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated Breast Volume Assessment Derived From Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images Compared to Mastectomy Specimen Weight and Its Applications in Cosmetic Optimisation.
Munir A; Huws AM; Khawaja S; Khan S; Holt S; Sharaiha Y
Cureus; 2021 Nov; 13(11):e19642. PubMed ID: 34926087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated Volumetric Mammographic Breast Density Measurements May Underestimate Percent Breast Density for High-density Breasts.
Rahbar K; Gubern-Merida A; Patrie JT; Harvey JA
Acad Radiol; 2017 Dec; 24(12):1561-1569. PubMed ID: 28754209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing Visually Assessed BI-RADS Breast Density and Automated Volumetric Breast Density Software: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Breast Cancer Screening Setting.
van der Waal D; den Heeten GJ; Pijnappel RM; Schuur KH; Timmers JM; Verbeek AL; Broeders MJ
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136667. PubMed ID: 26335569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Calculation of breast volumes from mammogram: Comparison of four separate equations relative to mastectomy specimen volumes.
Rostas JW; Bhutiani N; Crigger M; Crawford SMW; Hollenbach RB; Heidrich SR; Martin RCG; McMasters KM; Ajkay N
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 117(8):1848-1853. PubMed ID: 29790170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of Implant Size Based on Breast Volume Using Mammography with Fully Automated Measurements and Breast MRI.
Kim YS; Cho HG; Kim J; Park SJ; Kim HJ; Lee SE; Yang JD; Kim WH; Lee JS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Nov; 29(12):7845-7854. PubMed ID: 35723790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic breast density: comparison of methods for quantitative evaluation.
Morrish OW; Tucker L; Black R; Willsher P; Duffy SW; Gilbert FJ
Radiology; 2015 May; 275(2):356-65. PubMed ID: 25559234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment.
Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Kim JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1056-62. PubMed ID: 26934689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating Implant Volume and Mastectomy-Specimen Volume by Measuring Breast Volume With a 3-Dimensional Scanner.
Utsunomiya H; Kusano T; Sato N; Yoshimoto S
Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Jul; 79(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 28328637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast Volume Measurement by Recycling the Data Obtained From 2 Routine Modalities, Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Itsukage S; Sowa Y; Goto M; Taguchi T; Numajiri T
Eplasty; 2017; 17():e39. PubMed ID: 29308107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Conversion from weight to volume of mastectomy specimen: Convenient equations.
Lee JH; Yeo CH; Kim T; Chung KJ; Lee SJ; Kang SH; Choi JE
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Jun; 70(6):792-794. PubMed ID: 28408284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fully automated measurements of volumetric breast density adapted for BIRADS 5th edition: a comparison with visual assessment.
Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Eun NL; Kim JA
Acta Radiol; 2021 Sep; 62(9):1148-1154. PubMed ID: 32910685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Classification of fatty and dense breast parenchyma: comparison of automatic volumetric density measurement and radiologists' classification and their inter-observer variation.
Østerås BH; Martinsen AC; Brandal SH; Chaudhry KN; Eben E; Haakenaasen U; Falk RS; Skaane P
Acta Radiol; 2016 Oct; 57(10):1178-85. PubMed ID: 26792823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast Density Estimation with Fully Automated Volumetric Method: Comparison to Radiologists' Assessment by BI-RADS Categories.
Singh T; Sharma M; Singla V; Khandelwal N
Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 26521687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.
Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26491909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiologist assessment of breast density by BI-RADS categories versus fully automated volumetric assessment.
Gweon HM; Youk JH; Kim JA; Son EJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):692-7. PubMed ID: 23971465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated Breast Density Computation in Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Influence on Mean Glandular Dose and BIRADS Density Categorization.
Castillo-García M; Chevalier M; Garayoa J; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; García-Pinto D; Valverde J
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):802-810. PubMed ID: 28214227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening.
Brandt KR; Scott CG; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Jensen MR; Whaley DH; Wu FF; Malkov S; Hruska CB; Norman AD; Heine J; Shepherd J; Pankratz VS; Kerlikowske K; Vachon CM
Radiology; 2016 Jun; 279(3):710-9. PubMed ID: 26694052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation of age and HRT use with breast density as assessed by Quantra™.
Skippage P; Wilkinson L; Allen S; Roche N; Dowsett M; A'hern R
Breast J; 2013; 19(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 23230974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiological assessment of breast density by visual classification (BI-RADS) compared to automated volumetric digital software (Quantra): implications for clinical practice.
Regini E; Mariscotti G; Durando M; Ghione G; Luparia A; Campanino PP; Bianchi CC; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
Radiol Med; 2014 Oct; 119(10):741-9. PubMed ID: 24610166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
