These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34136962)

  • 21. Perceptions of research integrity and the Chinese situation: In-depth interviews with Chinese biomedical researchers in Europe.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Account Res; 2019 Oct; 26(7):405-426. PubMed ID: 31379202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Questionable research practices in competitive grant funding: A survey.
    Conix S; De Peuter S; Block A; Vaesen K
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293310. PubMed ID: 37917785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Handling Anomalous Data in the Lab: Students' Perspectives on Deleting and Discarding.
    Johansen MW; Christiansen FV
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Apr; 26(2):1107-1128. PubMed ID: 32166525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Are You Sure You Want to Do That? Fostering the Responsible Conduct of Medical Education Research.
    Maggio LA; Artino AR; Picho K; Driessen EW
    Acad Med; 2018 Apr; 93(4):544-549. PubMed ID: 28678102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How do Chinese universities address research integrity and misconduct? A review of university documents.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Dev World Bioeth; 2019 Jun; 19(2):64-75. PubMed ID: 31091553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fifty years of research on questionable research practises in science: quantitative analysis of co-citation patterns.
    Neoh MJY; Carollo A; Lee A; Esposito G
    R Soc Open Sci; 2023 Oct; 10(10):230677. PubMed ID: 37859842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In Their Own Words: Research Misconduct from the Perspective of Researchers in Malaysian Universities.
    Olesen AP; Amin L; Mahadi Z
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Dec; 24(6):1755-1776. PubMed ID: 29249021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Are questionable research practices facilitating new discoveries in sport and exercise medicine? The proportion of supported hypotheses is implausibly high.
    Büttner F; Toomey E; McClean S; Roe M; Delahunt E
    Br J Sports Med; 2020 Nov; 54(22):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 32699001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Indicators of questionable research practices were identified in 163,129 randomized controlled trials.
    Damen JA; Heus P; Lamberink HJ; Tijdink JK; Bouter L; Glasziou P; Moher D; Otte WM; Vinkers CH; Hooft L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Feb; 154():23-32. PubMed ID: 36470577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Testing for Questionable Research Practices in a Meta-Analysis: An Example from Experimental Parapsychology.
    Bierman DJ; Spottiswoode JP; Bijl A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0153049. PubMed ID: 27144889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Navigating the Science System: Research Integrity and Academic Survival Strategies.
    Reyes Elizondo A; Kaltenbrunner W
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2024 Apr; 30(2):12. PubMed ID: 38568341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is failure to raise concerns about misconduct a breach of integrity? Researchers' reflections on reporting misconduct.
    Satalkar P; Shaw D
    Account Res; 2018; 25(6):311-339. PubMed ID: 29954230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ethical Consistency and Experience: An Attempt to Influence Researcher Attitudes Toward Questionable Research Practices Through Reading Prompts.
    Bruton SV; Brown M; Sacco DF
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Jul; 15(3):216-226. PubMed ID: 31865855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a systematic, retrospective study.
    Stretton S; Bramich NJ; Keys JR; Monk JA; Ely JA; Haley C; Woolley MJ; Woolley KL
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Oct; 28(10):1575-83. PubMed ID: 22978774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceptions of plagiarism by biomedical researchers: an online survey in Europe and China.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jun; 21(1):44. PubMed ID: 32487190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Expanding responsible conduct of research instruction across the university.
    Bulger RE; Heitman E
    Acad Med; 2007 Sep; 82(9):876-8. PubMed ID: 17726396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Scientists Still Behaving Badly? A Survey Within Industry and Universities.
    Godecharle S; Fieuws S; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Dec; 24(6):1697-1717. PubMed ID: 28971354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Commentary: Perverse incentives or rotten apples?
    Bouter LM
    Account Res; 2015; 22(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 25635847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perceptions of Chinese Biomedical Researchers Towards Academic Misconduct: A Comparison Between 2015 and 2010.
    Liao QJ; Zhang YY; Fan YC; Zheng MH; Bai Y; Eslick GD; He XX; Zhang SB; Xia HH; He H
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Apr; 24(2):629-645. PubMed ID: 28397174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Research Misconduct in the Fields of Ethics and Philosophy: Researchers' Perceptions in Spain.
    Feenstra RA; Delgado López-Cózar E; Pallarés-Domínguez D
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Jan; 27(1):1. PubMed ID: 33492516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.