These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34136973)

  • 1. Proactive and reactive metacontrol in task switching.
    Kang MS; Chiu YC
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Nov; 49(8):1617-1632. PubMed ID: 34136973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Well under control: Control demand changes are sufficient for metacontrol.
    Kang MS; Yu-Chin C
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1032304. PubMed ID: 36533050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Task foreknowledge swallows item-specific but not list-wide control learning effects.
    Yu-Chin C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 May; 49(5):776-792. PubMed ID: 36201805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concurrent expectation and experience-based metacontrol: EEG insights and the role of working memory capacity.
    Kang MS; Yu-Chin C
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2024 Jun; 24(3):402-420. PubMed ID: 38291309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learned switch readiness via concurrent activation of task sets: Evidence from task specificity and memory load.
    Nack CA; Yu-Chin C
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38627358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contextual adaptation of cognitive flexibility in kindergartners and fourth graders.
    Lucenet J; Blaye A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2023 Mar; 227():105586. PubMed ID: 36413870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cueing cognitive flexibility: Item-specific learning of switch readiness.
    Chiu YC; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1950-1960. PubMed ID: 28406686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How metacontrol biases and adaptivity impact performance in cognitive search tasks.
    Mekern VN; Sjoerds Z; Hommel B
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():251-259. PubMed ID: 30368066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What matters in the cued task-switching paradigm: tasks or cues?
    Mayr U
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):794-9. PubMed ID: 17328375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Item-specific priming of voluntary task switches.
    Chiu YC; Fröber K; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Apr; 46(4):434-441. PubMed ID: 32223294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contextual Adaptation of Cognitive Flexibility is driven by Task- and Item-Level Learning.
    Siqi-Liu A; Egner T
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2020 Aug; 20(4):757-782. PubMed ID: 32495271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Task sets define boundaries of learned cognitive flexibility in list-wide proportion switch manipulations.
    Siqi-Liu A; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Aug; 49(8):1111-1122. PubMed ID: 37326527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cue-switch costs in task-switching: cue priming or control processes?
    Grange JA; Houghton G
    Psychol Res; 2010 Sep; 74(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 20037766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. More change in task repetition, less cost in task switching: Behavioral and event-related potential evidence.
    Zhuo B; Zhu M; Cao B; Li F
    Eur J Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 53(8):2553-2566. PubMed ID: 33449386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimal impact of consolidation on learned switch-readiness.
    Bejjani C; Siqi-Liu A; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1622-1637. PubMed ID: 34694824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiological correlates of the cognitive control processes underpinning mixing and switching costs.
    Tarantino V; Mazzonetto I; Vallesi A
    Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 1646():160-173. PubMed ID: 27238463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs.
    Mayr U; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 May; 29(3):362-72. PubMed ID: 12776747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of cue format and cue transparency on task switching performance.
    Gade M; Steinhauser M
    Psychol Res; 2020 Jul; 84(5):1346-1369. PubMed ID: 30725390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost.
    Arbuthnott KD; Woodward TS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Mar; 56(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 11901958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dissociating expectancy-based and experience-based control in task switching.
    Liu C; Yeung N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Feb; 46(2):131-154. PubMed ID: 31985251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.