These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34136973)
1. Proactive and reactive metacontrol in task switching. Kang MS; Chiu YC Mem Cognit; 2021 Nov; 49(8):1617-1632. PubMed ID: 34136973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Well under control: Control demand changes are sufficient for metacontrol. Kang MS; Yu-Chin C Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1032304. PubMed ID: 36533050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Task foreknowledge swallows item-specific but not list-wide control learning effects. Yu-Chin C J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 May; 49(5):776-792. PubMed ID: 36201805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Concurrent expectation and experience-based metacontrol: EEG insights and the role of working memory capacity. Kang MS; Yu-Chin C Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2024 Jun; 24(3):402-420. PubMed ID: 38291309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Learned switch readiness via concurrent activation of task sets: Evidence from task specificity and memory load. Nack CA; Yu-Chin C Mem Cognit; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38627358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contextual adaptation of cognitive flexibility in kindergartners and fourth graders. Lucenet J; Blaye A J Exp Child Psychol; 2023 Mar; 227():105586. PubMed ID: 36413870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cue-switch costs in task-switching: cue priming or control processes? Grange JA; Houghton G Psychol Res; 2010 Sep; 74(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 20037766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. More change in task repetition, less cost in task switching: Behavioral and event-related potential evidence. Zhuo B; Zhu M; Cao B; Li F Eur J Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 53(8):2553-2566. PubMed ID: 33449386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimal impact of consolidation on learned switch-readiness. Bejjani C; Siqi-Liu A; Egner T J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1622-1637. PubMed ID: 34694824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrophysiological correlates of the cognitive control processes underpinning mixing and switching costs. Tarantino V; Mazzonetto I; Vallesi A Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 1646():160-173. PubMed ID: 27238463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Mayr U; Kliegl R J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 May; 29(3):362-72. PubMed ID: 12776747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of cue format and cue transparency on task switching performance. Gade M; Steinhauser M Psychol Res; 2020 Jul; 84(5):1346-1369. PubMed ID: 30725390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost. Arbuthnott KD; Woodward TS Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Mar; 56(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 11901958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dissociating expectancy-based and experience-based control in task switching. Liu C; Yeung N J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Feb; 46(2):131-154. PubMed ID: 31985251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]