These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3413994)
1. Quantal fluctuation limitations on reaction time to sinusoidal gratings. Rudd ME Vision Res; 1988; 28(1):179-86. PubMed ID: 3413994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relation between flicker and two-pulse sensitivities for sinusoidal gratings. Ohtani Y; Ejima Y Vision Res; 1988; 28(1):145-56. PubMed ID: 3413991 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A multiple-channel model for grating detection. Jaschinski-Kruza W; Cavonius CR Vision Res; 1984; 24(9):933-41. PubMed ID: 6506481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distortion products in geniculate X-cells: a physiological basis for masking by spatially modulated gratings? Derrington AM Vision Res; 1987; 27(8):1377-86. PubMed ID: 3424685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Responses of simple and complex cells to compound sine-wave gratings. Pollen DA; Gaska JP; Jacobson LD Vision Res; 1988; 28(1):25-39. PubMed ID: 3413996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visible persistence as a function of spatial frequency, number of cycles and retinal area. Lovegrove WJ; Meyer GE Vision Res; 1984; 24(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 6719840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Objective evidence for phase-independent spatial frequency analysis in the human visual pathway. Regan D; Regan MP Vision Res; 1988; 28(1):187-91. PubMed ID: 3413995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modelling contrast sensitivity as a function of retinal illuminance and grating area. Rovamo J; Mustonen J; Näsänen R Vision Res; 1994 May; 34(10):1301-14. PubMed ID: 8023438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Local regulation of luminance gain. Burr DC; Ross J; Morrone MC Vision Res; 1985; 25(5):717-27. PubMed ID: 4024472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Apparent contrast of a sinusoidal grating in the simultaneous presence of peripheral gratings. Ejima Y; Takahashi S Vision Res; 1985; 25(9):1223-32. PubMed ID: 4072001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial frequency summation in visual noise. Taylor CP; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2009 Nov; 26(11):B84-93. PubMed ID: 19884918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The contrast sensitivity gradient across the human visual field: with emphasis on the low spatial frequency range. Pointer JS; Hess RF Vision Res; 1989; 29(9):1133-51. PubMed ID: 2617861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A retinal smear technique for varying grating contrast. Petry HM; Knoblauch K; Moore RK; Riggs LA Vision Res; 1987; 27(4):681-3. PubMed ID: 3660628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. II. Linearity of temporal and spatial summation. DeAngelis GC; Ohzawa I; Freeman RD J Neurophysiol; 1993 Apr; 69(4):1118-35. PubMed ID: 8492152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of noise check size and shape on grating detectability. Rovamo J; Kukkonen H Vision Res; 1996 Jan; 36(2):271-9. PubMed ID: 8594825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modulation dependence of the accommodation response to sinusoidal gratings. Tucker J; Charman WN; Ward PA Vision Res; 1986; 26(10):1693-707. PubMed ID: 3617510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection and identification of spatial frequency: models and data. Yager D; Kramer P; Shaw M; Graham N Vision Res; 1984; 24(9):1021-35. PubMed ID: 6506466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pupil response as an objective measure of visual acuity. Barbur JL; Thomson WD Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1987; 7(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 3454921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]