185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34140724)
1. Bayesian latent class analysis when the reference test is imperfect.
Cheung A; Dufour S; Jones G; Kostoulas P; Stevenson MA; Singanallur NB; Firestone SM
Rev Sci Tech; 2021 Jun; 40(1):271-286. PubMed ID: 34140724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simultaneous alleviation of verification and reference standard biases in a community-based tuberculosis screening study using Bayesian latent class analysis.
Keter AK; Vanobberghen F; Lynen L; Van Heerden A; Fehr J; Olivier S; Wong EB; Glass TR; Reither K; Goetghebeur E; Jacobs BKM
PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0305126. PubMed ID: 38857227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gold standards are out and Bayes is in: Implementing the cure for imperfect reference tests in diagnostic accuracy studies.
Johnson WO; Jones G; Gardner IA
Prev Vet Med; 2019 Jun; 167():113-127. PubMed ID: 31027713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic tests allowing for imperfect reference standards.
Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5398-413. PubMed ID: 24003003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. STARD-BLCM: Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies that use Bayesian Latent Class Models.
Kostoulas P; Nielsen SS; Branscum AJ; Johnson WO; Dendukuri N; Dhand NK; Toft N; Gardner IA
Prev Vet Med; 2017 Mar; 138():37-47. PubMed ID: 28237234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian latent class models with conditionally dependent diagnostic tests: a case study.
Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4469-88. PubMed ID: 18551515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Bayesian Hui-Walter and logistic regression latent class models to estimate diagnostic test characteristics with simulated data.
Ni H; Koop G; Klugkist I; Nielen M
Prev Vet Med; 2023 Aug; 217():105972. PubMed ID: 37499309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests and disease prevalence when the true disease state is unknown.
Enøe C; Georgiadis MP; Johnson WO
Prev Vet Med; 2000 May; 45(1-2):61-81. PubMed ID: 10802334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Keeping continuous diagnostic data continuous: Application of Bayesian latent class models in veterinary research.
Yang DA; Xiao X; Jiang P; Pfeiffer DU; Laven RA
Prev Vet Med; 2022 Apr; 201():105596. PubMed ID: 35220040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Different latent class models were used and evaluated for assessing the accuracy of campylobacter diagnostic tests: overcoming imperfect reference standards?
Asselineau J; Paye A; Bessède E; Perez P; Proust-Lima C
Epidemiol Infect; 2018 Sep; 146(12):1556-1564. PubMed ID: 29945689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests using latent class models that account for conditional dependence between tests: a simulation study.
Keddie SH; Baerenbold O; Keogh RH; Bradley J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Mar; 23(1):58. PubMed ID: 36894883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian latent class models to estimate diagnostic test accuracies of COVID-19 tests.
Hartnack S; Eusebi P; Kostoulas P
J Med Virol; 2021 Feb; 93(2):639-640. PubMed ID: 32770741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Latent class models in diagnostic studies when there is no reference standard--a systematic review.
van Smeden M; Naaktgeboren CA; Reitsma JB; Moons KG; de Groot JA
Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Feb; 179(4):423-31. PubMed ID: 24272278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual composite reference standards (dCRS) in molecular diagnostic research: A new approach to reduce bias in the presence of Imperfect reference.
Tang S; Hemyari P; Canchola JA; Duncan J
J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(5):951-965. PubMed ID: 29355450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using a web-based application to define the accuracy of diagnostic tests when the gold standard is imperfect.
Lim C; Wannapinij P; White L; Day NP; Cooper BS; Peacock SJ; Limmathurotsakul D
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e79489. PubMed ID: 24265775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian hierarchical latent class models for estimating diagnostic accuracy.
Wang C; Lin X; Nelson KP
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1112-1128. PubMed ID: 31146651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of histopathology, PCR, and qPCR to detect Mikrocytos mackini in oysters Crassostrea gigas using Bayesian latent class analysis.
Polinski MP; Laurin E; Delphino MKVC; Lowe GJ; Meyer GR; Abbott CL
Dis Aquat Organ; 2021 Mar; 144():21-31. PubMed ID: 33704089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating Diagnostic Tests for
Jekarl DW; Choi H; Kim JY; Lee S; Gweon TG; Lee HK; Kim Y
Ann Lab Med; 2020 Jan; 40(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 31432642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating prevalence and test accuracy in disease ecology: How Bayesian latent class analysis can boost or bias imperfect test results.
Helman SK; Mummah RO; Gostic KM; Buhnerkempe MG; Prager KC; Lloyd-Smith JO
Ecol Evol; 2020 Jul; 10(14):7221-7232. PubMed ID: 32760523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bayesian estimation of true prevalence, sensitivity and specificity of three diagnostic tests for detection of Escherichia coli O157 in cattle feces.
Ekong PS; Sanderson MW; Bello NM; Noll LW; Cernicchiaro N; Renter DG; Bai J; Nagaraja TG
Prev Vet Med; 2017 Dec; 148():21-27. PubMed ID: 29157370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
