146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34140805)
1. Objective Real-World Outcomes of Patients Suffering from Painful Neurogenic Claudication Treated with the
Deer T; Kim C; Wahezi SE; Qu H; Sayed D;
J Pain Res; 2021; 14():1687-1697. PubMed ID: 34140805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The MOTION Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Objective Real-World Outcomes for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients Treated with the mild® Procedure: One-Year Results.
Deer TR; Costandi SJ; Washabaugh E; Chafin TB; Wahezi SE; Jassal N; Sayed D
Pain Med; 2022 Apr; 23(4):625-634. PubMed ID: 35167700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.
Benyamin RM; Staats PS; MiDAS Encore I
Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 27228511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MiDAS ENCORE: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Report of 6-Month Results.
Staats PS; Benyamin RM;
Pain Physician; 2016 Feb; 19(2):25-38. PubMed ID: 26815247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The MOTION study: Two-year results of a real-world randomized controlled trial of the mild® procedure for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Deer TR; Chafin TB; Costandi SJ; Qu H; Kim C; Jassal N; Patel K; Calodney A
Pain Pract; 2024 Jan; 24(1):109-119. PubMed ID: 37661347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MiDAS ENCORE: Randomized Controlled Study Design and Protocol.
Benyamin RM; Staats PS
Pain Physician; 2015; 18(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 26218933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive direct decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: impact of multiple prior epidural steroid injections.
Pryzbylkowski P; Bux A; Chandwani K; Khemlani V; Puri S; Rosenberg J; Sukumaran H
Pain Manag; 2022 Mar; 12(2):149-158. PubMed ID: 34344197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Study of percutaneous lumbar decompression and treatment algorithm for patients suffering from neurogenic claudication.
Deer TR; Kim CK; Bowman RG; Ranson MT; Yee BS
Pain Physician; 2012; 15(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 23159960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild(®) for spinal stenosis.
Mekhail N; Vallejo R; Coleman MH; Benyamin RM
Pain Pract; 2012 Mar; 12(3):184-93. PubMed ID: 21676166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression: a review of indications, techniques, efficacy and safety.
Jain S; Deer T; Sayed D; Chopra P; Wahezi S; Jassal N; Weisbein J; Jameson J; Malinowski M; Golovac S
Pain Manag; 2020 Sep; 10(5):331-348. PubMed ID: 32609052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Understanding whether chronic lower back pain patients with lumbar spinal stenosis benefit from multiple epidural steroid injections prior to the
Pryzbylkowski P; Bux A; Chandwani K; Khemlani V; Puri S; Rosenberg J; Sukumaran H
Pain Manag; 2022 Apr; 12(3):261-266. PubMed ID: 34751594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Functional and patient-reported outcomes in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis following percutaneous decompression.
Mekhail N; Costandi S; Abraham B; Samuel SW
Pain Pract; 2012 Jul; 12(6):417-25. PubMed ID: 22651852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization.
Schmidt S; Franke J; Rauschmann M; Adelt D; Bonsanto MM; Sola S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Apr; 28(4):406-415. PubMed ID: 29372860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MiDAS I (mild Decompression Alternative to Open Surgery): a preliminary report of a prospective, multi-center clinical study.
Chopko B; Caraway DL
Pain Physician; 2010; 13(4):369-78. PubMed ID: 20648206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression: A Narrative Review.
Yuan H; Yi X
J Pain Res; 2023; 16():3707-3724. PubMed ID: 37954472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Five-year results of a clinical pilot study utilizing a pedicle-lengthening osteotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Mlyavykh S; Ludwig SC; Kepler CK; Anderson DG
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):241-249. PubMed ID: 29856305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrospective review of patient self-reported improvement and post-procedure findings for mild (minimally invasive lumbar decompression).
Lingreen R; Grider JS
Pain Physician; 2010; 13(6):555-60. PubMed ID: 21102968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mild procedure: single-site prospective IRB study.
Basu S
Clin J Pain; 2012; 28(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 21926907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Comprehensive Review of Novel Interventional Techniques for Chronic Pain: Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Disc Disease-MILD Percutaneous Image Guided Lumbar Decompression, Vertiflex Interspinous Spacer, MinuteMan G3 Interspinous-Interlaminar Fusion.
Kaye AD; Edinoff AN; Temple SN; Kaye AJ; Chami AA; Shah RJ; Dixon BM; Alvarado MA; Cornett EM; Viswanath O; Urits I; Calodney AK
Adv Ther; 2021 Sep; 38(9):4628-4645. PubMed ID: 34398386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Impact of Age on the Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Mekhail NA; Costandi SJ; Armanyous S; Vallejo R; Poree LR; Brown LL; Golovac S; Deer TR
Med Devices (Auckl); 2020; 13():151-161. PubMed ID: 32581602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
