These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34141579)

  • 21. Assessing the readability, quality and accuracy of online health information for patients with low anterior resection syndrome following surgery for rectal cancer.
    Garfinkle R; Wong-Chong N; Petrucci A; Sylla P; Wexner SD; Bhatnagar S; Morin N; Boutros M
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 May; 21(5):523-531. PubMed ID: 30609222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
    Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Information quality and health risks in Spanish-language retail websites for Chinese herbal medicine].
    Tejedor-García N; García-Pastor C; Benito-Martínez S; de Lucio-Cazaña FJ
    Gac Sanit; 2018; 32(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 28318753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. All I Have Learned, I Have Learned from Google: Why Today's Facial Rejuvenation Patients are Prone to Misinformation, and the Steps We can take to Contend with Unreliable Information.
    Mehta N; Gupta A; Nissan M
    Facial Plast Surg; 2019 Aug; 35(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 31412380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Online Information on the Treatment of Burning Mouth Syndrome: Quality and Readability.
    Alnafea S; Fedele S; Porter S; Ni Riordain R
    J Oral Facial Pain Headache; 2017 Spring; 31(2):147-151. PubMed ID: 28437511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quality of consumer-oriented websites containing information about the second trimester ultrasound examination during pregnancy.
    Georgsson S; Carlsson T
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Apr; 20(1):235. PubMed ID: 32321482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Quality of Online Information for an Uncommon Malignancy-Neuroendocrine Tumours (NETs).
    Sohail S; Zuk V; Halfdanarson T; Chan D; Pattison S; Vasdev R; Law C; Hallet J
    Curr Oncol; 2021 Feb; 28(1):842-846. PubMed ID: 33567619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation Breast Cancer Information on The Internet in Arabic.
    Alnaim L
    J Cancer Educ; 2019 Aug; 34(4):810-818. PubMed ID: 29923058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of internet websites marketing herbal weight-loss supplements to consumers.
    Jordan MA; Haywood T
    J Altern Complement Med; 2007 Nov; 13(9):1035-43. PubMed ID: 18047451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Seeing is believing? A mixed-methods study exploring the quality and perceived trustworthiness of online information about chronic conditions aimed at children and young people.
    McPherson AC; Gofine ML; Stinson J
    Health Commun; 2014; 29(5):473-82. PubMed ID: 24099647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Content and quality of information websites about congenital heart defects following a prenatal diagnosis.
    Carlsson T; Bergman G; Karlsson AM; Mattsson E
    Interact J Med Res; 2015 Jan; 4(1):e4. PubMed ID: 25608457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cross sectional analysis of scoliosis-specific information on the internet: potential for patient confusion and misinformation.
    Truumees D; Duncan A; Mayer EK; Geck M; Singh D; Truumees E
    Spine Deform; 2020 Dec; 8(6):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 32578159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Tinnitus information online - does it ring true?
    McKearney RM; MacKinnon RC; Smith M; Baker R
    J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Nov; 132(11):984-989. PubMed ID: 30353795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The quality of health information provided on web sites selling cannabis to consumers in Canada is poor.
    Ng JY; Tahir U; Lum N
    Harm Reduct J; 2022 Dec; 19(1):138. PubMed ID: 36503517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The quality of online information regarding non-surgical aesthetic procedures.
    Sinha V; Malik M; Borrelli MR; Sinha A; Cavale N
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Aug; 74(8):1881-1887. PubMed ID: 33341383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Barriers, knowledge, and training related to pharmacists' counselling on dietary and herbal supplements: a systematic review of qualitative studies.
    Ng JY; Tahir U; Dhaliwal S
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 May; 21(1):499. PubMed ID: 34034710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Radiotherapy for prostate cancer: DISCERN quality assessment of patient-oriented websites in 2018.
    Janssen S; Fahlbusch FB; Käsmann L; Rades D; Vordermark D
    BMC Urol; 2019 May; 19(1):42. PubMed ID: 31138209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Orthognathic surgery: is patient information on the Internet valid?
    Aldairy T; Laverick S; McIntyre GT
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Aug; 34(4):466-9. PubMed ID: 21459834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Patient-focused websites related to stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: a DISCERN quality analysis.
    Dueñas-Garcia OF; Kandadai P; Flynn MK; Patterson D; Saini J; O'Dell K
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Jun; 26(6):875-80. PubMed ID: 25578872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.