These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34141579)

  • 41. Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Rhinoplasty.
    Ahsanuddin S; Cadwell JB; Povolotskiy R; Paskhover B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Sep; 32(6):2019-2023. PubMed ID: 33534323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Separating the Wheat From the Chaff: An Evaluation of Readability, Quality, and Accuracy of Online Health Information for Treatment of Peyronie Disease.
    Bompastore NJ; Cisu T; Holoch P
    Urology; 2018 Aug; 118():59-64. PubMed ID: 29723588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The quality, suitability, content and readability of online health-related information regarding sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery.
    Brissette V; Alnaki A; Garfinkle R; Lloyd M; Demian M; Vasilevsky CA; Morin N; Boutros M
    Colorectal Dis; 2021 Feb; 23(2):376-383. PubMed ID: 33404140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Assessment of Quality and Content of Online Information About Hip Arthroscopy.
    Ellsworth B; Patel H; Kamath AF
    Arthroscopy; 2016 Oct; 32(10):2082-2089. PubMed ID: 27234649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The quality of Internet information on lingual orthodontics in the English language, with DISCERN and JAMA.
    Olkun HK; Demirkaya AA; Aras B
    J Orthod; 2019 Mar; 46(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 31056075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Readability and quality assessment of websites related to microtia and aural atresia.
    Alamoudi U; Hong P
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Feb; 79(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 25554575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Googling fibroids: A critical appraisal of information available on the internet.
    Hirsch M; Wojtaszewska A; Saridogan E; Mavrelos D; Barker C; Duffy JMN
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jul; 250():224-230. PubMed ID: 32473505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Quality of Information on Combined Oral Contraceptives Available on the Internet.
    Marcinkow A; Parkhomchik P; Schmode A; Yuksel N
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Nov; 41(11):1599-1607. PubMed ID: 31003948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Assessment of readability, quality and popularity of online information on ureteral stents.
    Mozafarpour S; Norris B; Borin J; Eisner BH
    World J Urol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):985-992. PubMed ID: 29435639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The quality of information on websites selling St. John's wort.
    Thakor V; Leach MJ; Gillham D; Esterman A
    Complement Ther Med; 2011 Jun; 19(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 21641521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Assessing the Quality of Online Health Information About Breast Cancer from Chinese Language Websites: Quality Assessment Survey.
    Sun W; Luo A; Bian Z; Zhao B; Liu P; Wang K; Liu Y; Xie W; Wang F
    JMIR Cancer; 2021 Nov; 7(4):e25783. PubMed ID: 34792471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Examining the Interaction Between Medical Information Seeking Online and Understanding: Exploratory Study.
    Kobayashi R; Ishizaki M
    JMIR Cancer; 2019 Sep; 5(2):e13240. PubMed ID: 31586366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quality of websites about long-acting reversible contraception: a descriptive cross-sectional study.
    Eriksson C; Skinstad M; Georgsson S; Carlsson T
    Reprod Health; 2019 Nov; 16(1):172. PubMed ID: 31775765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evaluation of Health on the Net seal label and DISCERN as content quality indicators for patients seeking information about thumb sucking habit.
    Shital Kiran DP; Bargale S; Pandya P; Bhatt K; Barad N; Shah N; Venkataraghavan K; Ramesh K
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2015 Aug; 7(Suppl 2):S481-5. PubMed ID: 26538902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessment of the quality of patient-orientated internet information on surgery for ulcerative colitis.
    Sacchi M; Yeung TM; Spinelli A; Mortensen NJ
    Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jun; 17(6):511-4. PubMed ID: 25510335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of internet derived patient information for Acute Pancreatitis.
    Miller CE; Ward J; Yoganantham DC; Bond A
    Ulster Med J; 2021 Jan; 90(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 33642626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Quality and Readability of Online Information on In-Office Vocal Fold Injections.
    Yi GS; Hu A
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2020 Mar; 129(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 31701778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A Quality Assessment of the Information Accessible to Patients on the Internet About the Whipple Procedure.
    Khachfe HH; Chahrour MA; Habib JR; Yu J; Jamali FR
    World J Surg; 2021 Jun; 45(6):1853-1859. PubMed ID: 33580299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Specialized medical search-engines are no better than general search-engines in sourcing consumer information about androgen deficiency.
    Ilic D; Bessell TL; Silagy CA; Green S
    Hum Reprod; 2003 Mar; 18(3):557-61. PubMed ID: 12615824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. What might parents read: Sorting webs of online information on vascular anomalies.
    Davis KS; McCormick AA; Jabbour N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 93():63-67. PubMed ID: 28109499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.