These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34142828)

  • 1. PyAutoFEP: An Automated Free Energy Perturbation Workflow for GROMACS Integrating Enhanced Sampling Methods.
    Carvalho Martins L; Cino EA; Ferreira RS
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Jul; 17(7):4262-4273. PubMed ID: 34142828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of octanol-water partition coefficients for the SAMPL6-[Formula: see text] molecules using molecular dynamics simulations with OPLS-AA, AMBER and CHARMM force fields.
    Fan S; Iorga BI; Beckstein O
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):543-560. PubMed ID: 31960254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations with FEP.
    Wang L; Chambers J; Abel R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():201-232. PubMed ID: 31396905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advancing Drug Discovery through Enhanced Free Energy Calculations.
    Abel R; Wang L; Harder ED; Berne BJ; Friesner RA
    Acc Chem Res; 2017 Jul; 50(7):1625-1632. PubMed ID: 28677954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Improved Free Energy Perturbation FEP+ Sampling Protocol for Flexible Ligand-Binding Domains.
    Fratev F; Sirimulla S
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16829. PubMed ID: 31728038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehensive, Open-Source, and Automated Workflow for Multisite λ-Dynamics in Lead Optimization.
    Hu R; Zhang J; Kang Y; Wang Z; Pan P; Deng Y; Hsieh CY; Hou T
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 Feb; 20(3):1465-1478. PubMed ID: 38300792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic GROMACS topology generation and comparisons of force fields for solvation free energy calculations.
    Lundborg M; Lindahl E
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jan; 119(3):810-23. PubMed ID: 25343332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using physics-based pose predictions and free energy perturbation calculations to predict binding poses and relative binding affinities for FXR ligands in the D3R Grand Challenge 2.
    Athanasiou C; Vasilakaki S; Dellis D; Cournia Z
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):21-44. PubMed ID: 29119352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of the Generalized Force Fields GAFF, CGenFF, OPLS-AA, and PRODRGFF by Testing Against Experimental Osmotic Coefficient Data for Small Drug-Like Molecules.
    Zhu S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Oct; 59(10):4239-4247. PubMed ID: 31557024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FEP Protocol Builder: Optimization of Free Energy Perturbation Protocols Using Active Learning.
    de Oliveira C; Leswing K; Feng S; Kanters R; Abel R; Bhat S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Sep; 63(17):5592-5603. PubMed ID: 37594480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does Hamiltonian Replica Exchange via Lambda-Hopping Enhance the Sampling in Alchemical Free Energy Calculations?
    Procacci P
    Molecules; 2022 Jul; 27(14):. PubMed ID: 35889299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Alchemical Free Energy Workflows for the Computation of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities.
    Herz AM; Kellici T; Morao I; Michel J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2716():241-264. PubMed ID: 37702943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated, Accurate, and Scalable Relative Protein-Ligand Binding Free-Energy Calculations Using Lambda Dynamics.
    Raman EP; Paul TJ; Hayes RL; Brooks CL
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Dec; 16(12):7895-7914. PubMed ID: 33201701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and Precision of Alchemical Relative Free Energy Predictions with and without Replica-Exchange.
    Wan S; Tresadern G; Pérez-Benito L; van Vlijmen H; Coveney PV
    Adv Theory Simul; 2020 Jan; 3(1):1900195. PubMed ID: 34527855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling Local Structural Rearrangements Using FEP/REST: Application to Relative Binding Affinity Predictions of CDK2 Inhibitors.
    Wang L; Deng Y; Knight JL; Wu Y; Kim B; Sherman W; Shelley JC; Lin T; Abel R
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2013 Feb; 9(2):1282-93. PubMed ID: 26588769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identifying and Overcoming the Sampling Challenges in Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations of a Model Protein:Protein Complex.
    Zhang I; Rufa DA; Pulido I; Henry MM; Rosen LE; Hauser K; Singh S; Chodera JD
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Aug; 19(15):4863-4882. PubMed ID: 37450482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. QligFEP: an automated workflow for small molecule free energy calculations in Q.
    Jespers W; Esguerra M; Åqvist J; Gutiérrez-de-Terán H
    J Cheminform; 2019 Apr; 11(1):26. PubMed ID: 30941533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identifying and overcoming the sampling challenges in relative binding free energy calculations of a model protein:protein complex.
    Zhang I; Rufa DA; Pulido I; Henry MM; Rosen LE; Hauser K; Singh S; Chodera JD
    bioRxiv; 2023 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 36945557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SAMPL6 blind predictions of water-octanol partition coefficients using nonequilibrium alchemical approaches.
    Procacci P; Guarnieri G
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):371-384. PubMed ID: 31624982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Current State of Open Source Force Fields in Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Predictions.
    Hahn DF; Gapsys V; de Groot BL; Mobley DL; Tresadern G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Jul; 64(13):5063-5076. PubMed ID: 38895959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.