216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34142867)
1. Superior objective and subjective image quality of deep learning reconstruction for low-dose abdominal CT imaging in comparison with model-based iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection.
Tamura A; Mukaida E; Ota Y; Kamata M; Abe S; Yoshioka K
Br J Radiol; 2021 Jul; 94(1123):20201357. PubMed ID: 34142867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1715-23. PubMed ID: 26037266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients.
Vardhanabhuti V; Riordan RD; Mitchell GR; Hyde C; Roobottom CA
Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study.
Deák Z; Grimm JM; Treitl M; Geyer LL; Linsenmaier U; Körner M; Reiser MF; Wirth S
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging.
Pickhardt PJ; Lubner MG; Kim DH; Tang J; Ruma JA; del Rio AM; Chen GH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1266-74. PubMed ID: 23169718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image quality assessment of pediatric chest and abdomen CT by deep learning reconstruction.
Yoon H; Kim J; Lim HJ; Lee MJ
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Oct; 21(1):146. PubMed ID: 34629049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deep learning reconstruction improves image quality of abdominal ultra-high-resolution CT.
Akagi M; Nakamura Y; Higaki T; Narita K; Honda Y; Zhou J; Yu Z; Akino N; Awai K
Eur Radiol; 2019 Nov; 29(11):6163-6171. PubMed ID: 30976831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the image qualities of filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction for CT venography at 80 kVp.
Kim JH; Choo KS; Moon TY; Lee JW; Jeon UB; Kim TU; Hwang JY; Yun MJ; Jeong DW; Lim SJ
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2055-63. PubMed ID: 26486938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image quality of CT angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction in young children with congenital heart disease: comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Son SS; Choo KS; Jeon UB; Jeon GR; Nam KJ; Kim TU; Yeom JA; Hwang JY; Jeong DW; Lim SJ
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31 Suppl 1():31-8. PubMed ID: 25414055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultra-low dose abdominal MDCT: using a knowledge-based Iterative Model Reconstruction technique for substantial dose reduction in a prospective clinical study.
Khawaja RDA; Singh S; Blake M; Harisinghani M; Choy G; Karosmangulu A; Padole A; Do S; Brown K; Thompson R; Morton T; Raihani N; Koehler T; Kalra MK
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25458225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients.
Sagara Y; Hara AK; Pavlicek W; Silva AC; Paden RG; Wu Q
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT of the chest with model-based, fully iterative reconstruction: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Ichikawa Y; Kitagawa K; Nagasawa N; Murashima S; Sakuma H
BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Aug; 13():27. PubMed ID: 23927627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CT of the pancreas: comparison of image quality and pancreatic duct depiction among model-based iterative, adaptive statistical iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
Lin XZ; Machida H; Tanaka I; Fukui R; Ueno E; Chen KM; Yan FH
Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 24496703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithms on high-resolution computed tomography in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease.
Katsura M; Sato J; Akahane M; Mise Y; Sumida K; Abe O
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():243-251. PubMed ID: 28668422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality.
Yanagawa M; Gyobu T; Leung AN; Kawai M; Kawata Y; Sumikawa H; Honda O; Tomiyama N
Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 24713541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Model-based iterative reconstruction versus adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection in liver 64-MDCT: focal lesion detection, lesion conspicuity, and image noise.
Shuman WP; Green DE; Busey JM; Kolokythas O; Mitsumori LM; Koprowicz KM; Thibault JB; Hsieh J; Alessio AM; Choi E; Kinahan PE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1071-6. PubMed ID: 23617492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: image quality assessment in the cervicothoracic region.
Katsura M; Sato J; Akahane M; Matsuda I; Ishida M; Yasaka K; Kunimatsu A; Ohtomo K
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):356-60. PubMed ID: 23199752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A phantom study of the performance of model-based iterative reconstruction in low-dose chest and abdominal CT: When are benefits maximized?
Moloney F; Twomey M; James K; Kavanagh RG; Fama D; O'Neill S; Grey TM; Moore N; Murphy MJ; O'Connor OJ; Maher MM
Radiography (Lond); 2018 Nov; 24(4):345-351. PubMed ID: 30292504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
