These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34143584)

  • 1. Bulk-fill versus layering pure ormocer posterior restorations: A randomized split-mouth clinical trial.
    Torres CR; Jurema AL; Souza MY; Di Nicoló R; Borges AB
    Am J Dent; 2021 Jun; 34(3):143-149. PubMed ID: 34143584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of a liner on deep bulk-fill restorations: Randomized clinical trial.
    Torres CRG; Mailart MC; Rocha RS; Sellan PLB; Contreras SCM; Di Nicoló R; Borges AB
    J Dent; 2020 Nov; 102():103454. PubMed ID: 32835711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized clinical split-mouth study on a novel self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative vs. a conventional bulk-fill composite for restoration of class II cavities - results after three years.
    Cieplik F; Hiller KA; Buchalla W; Federlin M; Scholz KJ
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104275. PubMed ID: 36044948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized 3-year clinical evaluation of Class I and II posterior resin restorations placed with a bulk-fill resin composite and a one-step self-etching adhesive.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Feb; 17(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 25625133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive in class II bulk-fill restorations: A 48-month randomized controlled trial.
    Yazici AR; Uslu Tekce A; Kutuk ZB
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103921. PubMed ID: 34896442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer and nanofill composite with and without a flowable liner.
    Efes BG; Dörter C; Gömeç Y; Koray F
    J Adhes Dent; 2006 Apr; 8(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 16708724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of thermo-viscous and sonic fill-activated bulk fill composite restorations.
    Morsy KE; Salama MM; Genaid TM
    Am J Dent; 2023 Apr; 36(2):81-85. PubMed ID: 37076297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized clinical split-mouth trial of a bulk-fill and a nanohybrid composite restorative in class II cavities: Three-year results.
    Sekundo C; Fazeli S; Felten A; Schoilew K; Wolff D; Frese C
    Dent Mater; 2022 May; 38(5):759-768. PubMed ID: 35437156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 24-Month Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-Fill Restorative Resins in Class II Restorations.
    Guney T; Yazici AR
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(2):123-133. PubMed ID: 31693438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can composite packaging and selective enamel etching affect the clinical behavior of bulk-fill composite resin in posterior restorations? 24-month results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Barceleiro MO; Tardem C; Albuquerque EG; Lopes LS; Marins SS; Poubel LA; Barcelos R; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Loguercio AD; Calazans FS
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2023; 31():e20220323. PubMed ID: 36790298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. One-year results of a novel self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative and a conventional bulk-fill composite in class II cavities-a randomized clinical split-mouth study.
    Cieplik F; Scholz KJ; Anthony JC; Tabenski I; Ettenberger S; Hiller KA; Buchalla W; Federlin M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):449-461. PubMed ID: 34129074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A 24-month clinical evaluation of composite resins with different viscosity and chemical compositions: a randomized clinical trial.
    Matos TP; Nuñez A; Méndez-Bauer M; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Barceleiro M; Duarte L; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    Quintessence Int; 2023 Mar; 54(3):186-199. PubMed ID: 36445776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of one nano-hybrid and one high-viscosity bulk-fill composite restorative systems in class II cavities: 12 months results.
    Colak H; Tokay U; Uzgur R; Hamidi MM; Ercan E
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Jul; 20(7):822-831. PubMed ID: 28791976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-year clinical performance of sonic-resin placement system in posterior restorations.
    Atabek D; Aktaş N; Sakaryali D; Bani M
    Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 28849804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical comparison of different glass ionomer-based restoratives and a bulk-fill resin composite in Class I cavities: A 48-month randomized split-mouth controlled trial.
    Bayazıt EÖ; Başeren M; Meral E
    J Dent; 2023 Apr; 131():104473. PubMed ID: 36863696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized 36-month follow-up of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations.
    Loguercio AD; Rezende M; Gutierrez MF; Costa TF; Armas-Vega A; Reis A
    J Dent; 2019 Jun; 85():93-102. PubMed ID: 31100332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Longevity of bulk fill and ormocer composites in permanent posterior teeth: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Abreu NM; Sousa FB; Dantas RV; Leite PK; Batista AU; Montenegro RV
    Am J Dent; 2022 Apr; 35(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 35506964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of different placement techniques on the clinical success of bulk-fill resin composites placed in Class II cavities: a 4-year randomized controlled clinical study.
    Çakır Kılınç NN; Demirbuğa S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Feb; 27(2):541-557. PubMed ID: 36222961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modification of the restoration protocol for resin-based composite (RBC) restoratives (conventional and bulk fill) on cuspal movement and microleakage score in molar teeth.
    Politi I; McHugh LEJ; Al-Fodeh RS; Fleming GJP
    Dent Mater; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 29857989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.