These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34144201)

  • 1. Model Setting and Interpretation of Results in Research Using Structural Equation Modeling: A Checklist with Guiding Questions for Reporting.
    Kang H; Ahn JW
    Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci); 2021 Aug; 15(3):157-162. PubMed ID: 34144201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying subgroups: Part 1: Patterns among cross-sectional data.
    Lee CS; Faulkner KM; Thompson JH
    Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2020 Apr; 19(4):359-365. PubMed ID: 32126820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Core reporting practices in structural equation modeling.
    Schreiber JB
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2008 Jun; 4(2):83-97. PubMed ID: 18555963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A systematic review of structural equation modelling in nursing research.
    Sharif SP; Mostafiz I; Guptan V
    Nurse Res; 2019 Sep; 26(2):28-31. PubMed ID: 30207432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A structural equation modeling approach for modeling variability as a latent variable.
    Feng Y; Hancock GR
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 35404625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Limited Information Estimator for Dynamic Factor Models.
    Fisher ZF; Bollen KA; Gates KM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(2):246-263. PubMed ID: 30829065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time to criterion latent growth models.
    Johnson TL; Hancock GR
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Dec; 24(6):690-707. PubMed ID: 30998039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beyond path diagrams: Enhancing applied structural equation modeling research through data visualization.
    Hallgren KA; McCabe CJ; King KM; Atkins DC
    Addict Behav; 2019 Jul; 94():74-82. PubMed ID: 30219251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alternative Multiple Imputation Inference for Categorical Structural Equation Modeling.
    Chung S; Cai L
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(3):323-337. PubMed ID: 30950634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Postselection Inference in Structural Equation Modeling.
    Huang PH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(3):344-360. PubMed ID: 31304796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Categorical Data.
    Savalei V
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(3):390-407. PubMed ID: 32054327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Quasi-Likelihood Approach to Assess Model Fit in Quadratic and Interaction SEM.
    Büchner RD; Klein AG
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(6):855-872. PubMed ID: 31825255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Update to core reporting practices in structural equation modeling.
    Schreiber JB
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2017; 13(3):634-643. PubMed ID: 27567146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation of Longitudinal Data Analysis: Hierarchical Linear Model and Latent Growth Model Using a Longitudinal Nursing Home Dataset.
    Shin JH; Shin IS
    Res Gerontol Nurs; 2019 Nov; 12(6):275-283. PubMed ID: 31755964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Some reflections on combining meta-analysis and structural equation modeling.
    Cheung MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 30175903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reporting structural equation modeling results in Psychology and Aging: some proposed guidelines.
    Raykov T; Tomer A; Nesselroade JR
    Psychol Aging; 1991 Dec; 6(4):499-503. PubMed ID: 1777136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Path and Direction Discovery in Individual Dynamic Factor Models: A Regularized Hybrid Unified Structural Equation Modeling with Latent Variable.
    Ye A; Bollen KA
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2024; 59(5):1019-1042. PubMed ID: 39058418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM), and Set-ESEM: Optimal Balance Between Goodness of Fit and Parsimony.
    Marsh HW; Guo J; Dicke T; Parker PD; Craven RG
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(1):102-119. PubMed ID: 31204844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analytic structural equation modeling with moderating effects on SEM parameters.
    Jak S; Cheung MW
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):430-455. PubMed ID: 31670537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structural equation modeling: strengths, limitations, and misconceptions.
    Tomarken AJ; Waller NG
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2005; 1():31-65. PubMed ID: 17716081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.