These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34144331)

  • 1. Dynamic global sagittal alignment in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: Analysis of the effects of decompression surgery on gait adaptations.
    Lamas V; Gueugnon M; Fournel I; Grelat M; Maillefert JF; Ornetti P; Martz P
    Gait Posture; 2021 Jul; 88():272-279. PubMed ID: 34144331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The sagittal spinal profile type: a principal precondition for surgical decision making in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Franke J; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 28862573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decompression surgery improves gait quality in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Loske S; Nüesch C; Byrnes KS; Fiebig O; Schären S; Mündermann A; Netzer C
    Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2195-2204. PubMed ID: 29709554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of sagittal spinopelvic alignment on clinical outcomes after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis without coronal imbalance.
    Hikata T; Watanabe K; Fujita N; Iwanami A; Hosogane N; Ishii K; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Oct; 23(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 26140404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Failure of Pelvic Compensation in Patients With Severe Positive Sagittal Imbalance: Comparison Between Static Radiographs and Gait Analysis of Spinopelvic Parameters in Adult Spinal Deformity and Lumbar Stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Shen F; Kang KT; Chun HJ; Kim ST; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jul; 44(13):E759-E765. PubMed ID: 31205168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic sagittal alignment and compensation strategies in adult spinal deformity during walking.
    Severijns P; Moke L; Overbergh T; Beaucage-Gauvreau E; Ackermans T; Desloovere K; Scheys L
    Spine J; 2021 Jul; 21(7):1059-1071. PubMed ID: 33621665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes of posture and muscle activities in the trunk and legs during walking in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis after decompression surgery. A preliminary report.
    Goto T; Sakai T; Enishi T; Sato N; Komatsu K; Sairyo K; Katoh S
    Gait Posture; 2017 Jan; 51():149-152. PubMed ID: 27764750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Sagittal Spinal Balance on the Outcome of Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Canal Stenosis.
    Chang HS
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Nov; 119():e200-e208. PubMed ID: 30036716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characteristics of thoracic and lumbar movements during gait in lumbar spinal stenosis patients before and after decompression surgery.
    Kuwahara W; Deie M; Fujita N; Tanaka N; Nakanishi K; Sunagawa T; Asaeda M; Nakamura H; Kono Y; Ochi M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Dec; 40():45-51. PubMed ID: 27821273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical Outcomes of Posterolateral Fusion vs. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Instability.
    Farrokhi MR; Yadollahikhales G; Gholami M; Mousavi SR; Mesbahi AR; Asadi-Pooya AA
    Pain Physician; 2018 Jul; 21(4):383-406. PubMed ID: 30045595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gait kinematic alterations in subjects with adult spinal deformity and their radiological determinants.
    Kawkabani G; Saliby RM; Mekhael M; Rachkidi R; Massaad A; Ghanem I; Kharrat K; Kreichati G; Saad E; Lafage V; Lafage R; Skalli W; Assi A
    Gait Posture; 2021 Jul; 88():203-209. PubMed ID: 34118744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization.
    Schmidt S; Franke J; Rauschmann M; Adelt D; Bonsanto MM; Sola S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Apr; 28(4):406-415. PubMed ID: 29372860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spinal sagittal balance status affects postoperative actual falls and quality of life after decompression and fusion in-situ surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Lee BH; Park JO; Kim HS; Suk KS; Lee SY; Lee HM; Yang JH; Moon SH
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Sep; 148():52-9. PubMed ID: 27398622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors associated with improvement in sagittal spinal alignment after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Takahashi S; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jul; 25(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 26967988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reversibility of nerve root sedimentation sign in lumbar spinal stenosis patients after decompression surgery.
    Barz C; Melloh M; Staub LP; Lord SJ; Merk HR; Barz T
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2573-2580. PubMed ID: 28161752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic global sagittal alignment evaluated by three-dimensional gait analysis in patients with degenerative lumbar kyphoscoliosis.
    Shiba Y; Taneichi H; Inami S; Moridaira H; Takeuchi D; Nohara Y
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Aug; 25(8):2572-9. PubMed ID: 27272276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of decompression surgery without fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis on sagittal spinopelvic alignment: minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Ogura Y; Shinozaki Y; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Ogawa J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Jun; 30(6):743-749. PubMed ID: 30771778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Objective functional assessment using the "Timed Up and Go" test in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Stienen MN; Maldaner N; Joswig H; Corniola MV; Bellut D; Prömmel P; Regli L; Weyerbrock A; Schaller K; Gautschi OP
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E4. PubMed ID: 31042663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identifying predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis patients using smart-shoe technology.
    Lee SI; Campion A; Huang A; Park E; Garst JH; Jahanforouz N; Espinal M; Siero T; Pollack S; Afridi M; Daneshvar M; Ghias S; Sarrafzadeh M; Lu DC
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jul; 14(1):77. PubMed ID: 28720144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of lumbo-pelvic postural taping on gait parameters in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kang MH; Kim ER; Kim YG; Kim TH; Oh JS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013; 28(9-10):956-60. PubMed ID: 24168812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.