These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34147204)

  • 21. Forging the Basis for Developing Protein-Ligand Interaction Scoring Functions.
    Liu Z; Su M; Han L; Liu J; Yang Q; Li Y; Wang R
    Acc Chem Res; 2017 Feb; 50(2):302-309. PubMed ID: 28182403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fast Rescoring Protocols to Improve the Performance of Structure-Based Virtual Screening Performed on Protein-Protein Interfaces.
    Singh N; Chaput L; Villoutreix BO
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Aug; 60(8):3910-3934. PubMed ID: 32786511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Considerations Around Structure-Based Drug Discovery for KRAS Using DOCK.
    Chakrabarti M; Tan YS; Balius TE
    Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2797():67-90. PubMed ID: 38570453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Protein Preparation Automatic Protocol for High-Throughput Inverse Virtual Screening: Accelerating the Target Identification by Computational Methods.
    De Vita S; Lauro G; Ruggiero D; Terracciano S; Riccio R; Bifulco G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Nov; 59(11):4678-4690. PubMed ID: 31593460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Molecular Dynamics as a Tool for Virtual Ligand Screening.
    Menchon G; Maveyraud L; Czaplicki G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():145-178. PubMed ID: 29594772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. CompScore: Boosting Structure-Based Virtual Screening Performance by Incorporating Docking Scoring Function Components into Consensus Scoring.
    Perez-Castillo Y; Sotomayor-Burneo S; Jimenes-Vargas K; Gonzalez-Rodriguez M; Cruz-Monteagudo M; Armijos-Jaramillo V; Cordeiro MNDS; Borges F; Sánchez-Rodríguez A; Tejera E
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Sep; 59(9):3655-3666. PubMed ID: 31449403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Yada: a novel tool for molecular docking calculations.
    Piotto S; Di Biasi L; Fino R; Parisi R; Sessa L; Concilio S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):753-759. PubMed ID: 27565794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Panel docking of small-molecule libraries - Prospects to improve efficiency of lead compound discovery.
    Sarnpitak P; Mujumdar P; Taylor P; Cross M; Coster MJ; Gorse AD; Krasavin M; Hofmann A
    Biotechnol Adv; 2015 Nov; 33(6 Pt 1):941-7. PubMed ID: 26025037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Portals and Web-Based Resources for Virtual Screening.
    Krüger J; Thiel P; Merelli I; Grunzke R; Gesing S
    Curr Drug Targets; 2016; 17(14):1649-1660. PubMed ID: 26844570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
    Li Q; Shah S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1558():111-124. PubMed ID: 28150235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Negative Image-Based Rescoring: Using Cavity Information to Improve Docking Screening.
    Pentikäinen OT; Postila PA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():141-154. PubMed ID: 33759125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comprehensive Survey of Consensus Docking for High-Throughput Virtual Screening.
    Blanes-Mira C; Fernández-Aguado P; de Andrés-López J; Fernández-Carvajal A; Ferrer-Montiel A; Fernández-Ballester G
    Molecules; 2022 Dec; 28(1):. PubMed ID: 36615367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Choosing the Optimal Rigid Receptor for Docking and Scoring in the CSAR 2013/2014 Experiment.
    Baumgartner MP; Camacho CJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1004-12. PubMed ID: 26222931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Structure-Based Virtual Screening of Commercially Available Compound Libraries.
    Kireev D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1439():65-76. PubMed ID: 27316988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Function and structure-based screening of compounds, peptides and proteins to identify drug candidates.
    Malik V; Dhanjal JK; Kumari A; Radhakrishnan N; Singh K; Sundar D
    Methods; 2017 Dec; 131():10-21. PubMed ID: 28843611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
    Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Computational protein-ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite.
    Forli S; Huey R; Pique ME; Sanner MF; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ
    Nat Protoc; 2016 May; 11(5):905-19. PubMed ID: 27077332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Discovery of binding proteins for a protein target using protein-protein docking-based virtual screening.
    Zhang C; Tang B; Wang Q; Lai L
    Proteins; 2014 Oct; 82(10):2472-82. PubMed ID: 24854898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Molecular Docking: Shifting Paradigms in Drug Discovery.
    Pinzi L; Rastelli G
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Sep; 20(18):. PubMed ID: 31487867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Benchmark Study Based on 2P2I
    Wang Z; Kang Y; Li D; Sun H; Dong X; Yao X; Xu L; Chang S; Li Y; Hou T
    J Phys Chem B; 2018 Mar; 122(9):2544-2555. PubMed ID: 29420886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.