587 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34147815)
1. Environmental and socioeconomic factors influencing the use of urban green spaces in Coimbra (Portugal).
Pinto L; Ferreira CSS; Pereira P
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Oct; 792():148293. PubMed ID: 34147815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cultural ecosystem services from urban green spaces: a case from English Bazar Urban Agglomeration, Eastern India.
Das A; Das M; Saha S; Pereira P
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(24):65933-65946. PubMed ID: 37093391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptions of ecosystem services, disservices and willingness-to-pay for urban green space conservation.
Tian Y; Wu H; Zhang G; Wang L; Zheng D; Li S
J Environ Manage; 2020 Apr; 260():110140. PubMed ID: 32090834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors affecting cultural ecosystem services use in Vilnius (Lithuania): A participatory mapping survey approach.
Pinto LV; Inácio M; Bogdzevič K; Kalinauskas M; Gomes E; Pereira P
Heliyon; 2023 Apr; 9(4):e15384. PubMed ID: 37101641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Users' preferences and perceptions towards urban green spaces in rapidly urbanized cities: The case of Debre Berhan and Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Kefale A; Fetene A; Desta H
Heliyon; 2023 Apr; 9(4):e15262. PubMed ID: 37089379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploring the role of nature-based typologies and stewardship schemes in enhancing urban green spaces: Citizen perceptions of landscape design scenarios and ecosystem services.
McCarthy LJ; Russo A
J Environ Manage; 2023 Nov; 346():118944. PubMed ID: 37738726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating Cultural Ecosystem Services of Urban Residential Green Spaces From the Perspective of Residents' Satisfaction With Green Space.
Mao Q; Wang L; Guo Q; Li Y; Liu M; Xu G
Front Public Health; 2020; 8():226. PubMed ID: 32766190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ecosystem services: Urban parks under a magnifying glass.
Mexia T; Vieira J; Príncipe A; Anjos A; Silva P; Lopes N; Freitas C; Santos-Reis M; Correia O; Branquinho C; Pinho P
Environ Res; 2018 Jan; 160():469-478. PubMed ID: 29078140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. COVID-19 pandemic changes the recreational use of Moscow parks in space and time: Outcomes from crowd-sourcing and machine learning.
Matasov V; Vasenev V; Matasov D; Dvornikov Y; Filyushkina A; Bubalo M; Nakhaev M; Konstantinova A
Urban For Urban Green; 2023 May; 83():127911. PubMed ID: 36987409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differing perceptions of the youth and the elderly regarding cultural ecosystem services in urban parks: An exploration of the tour experience.
Zhang K; Tang X; Zhao Y; Huang B; Huang L; Liu M; Luo E; Li Y; Jiang T; Zhang L; Wang Y; Wan J
Sci Total Environ; 2022 May; 821():153388. PubMed ID: 35085633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exploring the pattern of use and accessibility of urban green spaces: evidence from a coastal desert megacity in Saudi Arabia.
Addas A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Aug; 29(37):55757-55774. PubMed ID: 35318604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental, health, wellbeing, social and equity effects of urban green space interventions: A meta-narrative evidence synthesis.
Hunter RF; Cleland C; Cleary A; Droomers M; Wheeler BW; Sinnett D; Nieuwenhuijsen MJ; Braubach M
Environ Int; 2019 Sep; 130():104923. PubMed ID: 31228780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The benefits and disbenefits associated with cultural ecosystem services of urban green spaces.
Nowak-Olejnik A; Działek J; Hibner J; Liro J; Madej R; Sudmanns M; Haase D
Sci Total Environ; 2024 May; 926():172092. PubMed ID: 38556014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. "Enticing" but Not Necessarily a "Space Designed for Me": Experiences of Urban Park Use by Older Adults with Disability.
Perry M; Cotes L; Horton B; Kunac R; Snell I; Taylor B; Wright A; Devan H
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jan; 18(2):. PubMed ID: 33440760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impacts of a Temporary Urban Pop-Up Park on Physical Activity and Other Individual- and Community-Level Outcomes.
Salvo D; Banda JA; Sheats JL; Winter SJ; Lopes Dos Santos D; King AC
J Urban Health; 2017 Aug; 94(4):470-481. PubMed ID: 28646369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using local knowledge and sustainable transport to promote a greener city: The case of Bucharest, Romania.
Niță MR; Badiu DL; Onose DA; Gavrilidis AA; Grădinaru SR; Năstase II; Lafortezza R
Environ Res; 2018 Jan; 160():331-338. PubMed ID: 29054087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Active use and perceptions of parks as urban assets for physical activity: A mixed-methods study.
Fontán-Vela M; Rivera-Navarro J; Gullón P; Díez J; Anguelovski I; Franco M
Health Place; 2021 Sep; 71():102660. PubMed ID: 34454253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the demand for different shades of green.
Yap KKL; Soh MCK; Sia A; Chin WJ; Araib S; Ang WP; Tan PY; Er KBH
People Nat (Hoboken); 2022 Apr; 4(2):505-518. PubMed ID: 35571335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identification and assessment of the driving forces for the use of urban green parks and their accessibility in Colombo, Sri Lanka, through analytical hierarchical processing.
Pussella PRGNI; Li L
Geospat Health; 2019 May; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 31099517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Understanding the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Perception and Use of Urban Green Spaces in Korea.
Kim J; Ko Y; Kim W; Kim G; Lee J; Eyman OTG; Chowdhury S; Adiwal J; Son Y; Lee WK
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 36833712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
