These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
594 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34147815)
1. Environmental and socioeconomic factors influencing the use of urban green spaces in Coimbra (Portugal). Pinto L; Ferreira CSS; Pereira P Sci Total Environ; 2021 Oct; 792():148293. PubMed ID: 34147815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cultural ecosystem services from urban green spaces: a case from English Bazar Urban Agglomeration, Eastern India. Das A; Das M; Saha S; Pereira P Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(24):65933-65946. PubMed ID: 37093391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptions of ecosystem services, disservices and willingness-to-pay for urban green space conservation. Tian Y; Wu H; Zhang G; Wang L; Zheng D; Li S J Environ Manage; 2020 Apr; 260():110140. PubMed ID: 32090834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How do landscape patterns in urban parks affect multiple cultural ecosystem services perceived by residents? Bi X; Gan X; Jiang Z; Li Z; Li J Sci Total Environ; 2024 Oct; 946():174255. PubMed ID: 38925389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Users' preferences and perceptions towards urban green spaces in rapidly urbanized cities: The case of Debre Berhan and Debre Markos, Ethiopia. Kefale A; Fetene A; Desta H Heliyon; 2023 Apr; 9(4):e15262. PubMed ID: 37089379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploring the role of nature-based typologies and stewardship schemes in enhancing urban green spaces: Citizen perceptions of landscape design scenarios and ecosystem services. McCarthy LJ; Russo A J Environ Manage; 2023 Nov; 346():118944. PubMed ID: 37738726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors affecting cultural ecosystem services use in Vilnius (Lithuania): A participatory mapping survey approach. Pinto LV; Inácio M; Bogdzevič K; Kalinauskas M; Gomes E; Pereira P Heliyon; 2023 Apr; 9(4):e15384. PubMed ID: 37101641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating Cultural Ecosystem Services of Urban Residential Green Spaces From the Perspective of Residents' Satisfaction With Green Space. Mao Q; Wang L; Guo Q; Li Y; Liu M; Xu G Front Public Health; 2020; 8():226. PubMed ID: 32766190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ecosystem services: Urban parks under a magnifying glass. Mexia T; Vieira J; Príncipe A; Anjos A; Silva P; Lopes N; Freitas C; Santos-Reis M; Correia O; Branquinho C; Pinho P Environ Res; 2018 Jan; 160():469-478. PubMed ID: 29078140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. COVID-19 pandemic changes the recreational use of Moscow parks in space and time: Outcomes from crowd-sourcing and machine learning. Matasov V; Vasenev V; Matasov D; Dvornikov Y; Filyushkina A; Bubalo M; Nakhaev M; Konstantinova A Urban For Urban Green; 2023 May; 83():127911. PubMed ID: 36987409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differing perceptions of the youth and the elderly regarding cultural ecosystem services in urban parks: An exploration of the tour experience. Zhang K; Tang X; Zhao Y; Huang B; Huang L; Liu M; Luo E; Li Y; Jiang T; Zhang L; Wang Y; Wan J Sci Total Environ; 2022 May; 821():153388. PubMed ID: 35085633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental, health, wellbeing, social and equity effects of urban green space interventions: A meta-narrative evidence synthesis. Hunter RF; Cleland C; Cleary A; Droomers M; Wheeler BW; Sinnett D; Nieuwenhuijsen MJ; Braubach M Environ Int; 2019 Sep; 130():104923. PubMed ID: 31228780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploring the pattern of use and accessibility of urban green spaces: evidence from a coastal desert megacity in Saudi Arabia. Addas A Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Aug; 29(37):55757-55774. PubMed ID: 35318604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The benefits and disbenefits associated with cultural ecosystem services of urban green spaces. Nowak-Olejnik A; Działek J; Hibner J; Liro J; Madej R; Sudmanns M; Haase D Sci Total Environ; 2024 May; 926():172092. PubMed ID: 38556014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. "Enticing" but Not Necessarily a "Space Designed for Me": Experiences of Urban Park Use by Older Adults with Disability. Perry M; Cotes L; Horton B; Kunac R; Snell I; Taylor B; Wright A; Devan H Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jan; 18(2):. PubMed ID: 33440760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impacts of a Temporary Urban Pop-Up Park on Physical Activity and Other Individual- and Community-Level Outcomes. Salvo D; Banda JA; Sheats JL; Winter SJ; Lopes Dos Santos D; King AC J Urban Health; 2017 Aug; 94(4):470-481. PubMed ID: 28646369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Urban green space, perceived everyday discrimination and mental health among rural-to-urban migrants: a multilevel analysis in Wuhan, China. Cheng H; Li Z; Gou F; Wang Z; Zhai W BMC Public Health; 2024 Oct; 24(1):2788. PubMed ID: 39394081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using local knowledge and sustainable transport to promote a greener city: The case of Bucharest, Romania. Niță MR; Badiu DL; Onose DA; Gavrilidis AA; Grădinaru SR; Năstase II; Lafortezza R Environ Res; 2018 Jan; 160():331-338. PubMed ID: 29054087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Active use and perceptions of parks as urban assets for physical activity: A mixed-methods study. Fontán-Vela M; Rivera-Navarro J; Gullón P; Díez J; Anguelovski I; Franco M Health Place; 2021 Sep; 71():102660. PubMed ID: 34454253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the demand for different shades of green. Yap KKL; Soh MCK; Sia A; Chin WJ; Araib S; Ang WP; Tan PY; Er KBH People Nat (Hoboken); 2022 Apr; 4(2):505-518. PubMed ID: 35571335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]