These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34149491)

  • 1. Exploring Multiple Strategic Problem Solving Behaviors in Educational Psychology Research by Using Mixture Cognitive Diagnosis Model.
    Zhang J; Lu J; Yang J; Zhang Z; Sun S
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():568348. PubMed ID: 34149491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.
    Chen Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y; Douglas J
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 28861685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the DINA model parameters using the No-U-Turn Sampler.
    da Silva MA; de Oliveira ESB; von Davier AA; Bazán JL
    Biom J; 2018 Mar; 60(2):352-368. PubMed ID: 29194715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DINA Models for Multiple-Choice Items With Few Parameters: Considering Incorrect Answers.
    Ozaki K
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Sep; 39(6):431-447. PubMed ID: 29881017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.
    Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 28872185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Family of Generalized Diagnostic Classification Models for Multiple Choice Option-Based Scoring.
    DiBello LV; Henson RA; Stout WF
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Jan; 39(1):62-79. PubMed ID: 29880994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Model With Pólya-Gamma Gibbs Sampling.
    Zhang Z; Zhang J; Lu J; Tao J
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():384. PubMed ID: 32210894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Constrained Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro Algorithm for Q Matrix Estimation in DINA Models.
    Liu CW; Andersson B; Skrondal A
    Psychometrika; 2020 Jun; 85(2):322-357. PubMed ID: 32632838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.
    Choi Y; Seo DG
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():35. PubMed ID: 33197992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scalable Bayesian Approach for the Dina Q-Matrix Estimation Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference.
    Oka M; Okada K
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):302-331. PubMed ID: 36097246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian DINA Modeling Incorporating Within-Item Characteristic Dependency.
    Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao M; Bian Y
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Mar; 43(2):143-158. PubMed ID: 30792561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variational Bayes Inference Algorithm for the Saturated Diagnostic Classification Model.
    Yamaguchi K; Okada K
    Psychometrika; 2020 Dec; 85(4):973-995. PubMed ID: 33420895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Research on the Cognitive Diagnosis of Chinese Listening Comprehension Ability Based on the G-DINA Model.
    Li L; An Y; Ren J; Wei X
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():714568. PubMed ID: 34557134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A classification model for continuous responses: Identifying risk perception groups on health-related activities.
    de Oliveira ESB; Wang X; Bazán JL
    Biom J; 2023 Apr; 65(4):e2100222. PubMed ID: 36782079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo to estimate the log-linear cognitive diagnosis model via Stan.
    Jiang Z; Carter R
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Apr; 51(2):651-662. PubMed ID: 29949073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.
    Seo DG; Kim JK
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2021; 18():15. PubMed ID: 34225413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. APT-MCMC, a C++/Python implementation of Markov Chain Monte Carlo for parameter identification.
    Zhang LA; Urbano A; Clermont G; Swigon D; Banerjee I; Parker RS
    Comput Chem Eng; 2018 Feb; 110():1-12. PubMed ID: 31427833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fast genomic prediction of breeding values using parallel Markov chain Monte Carlo with convergence diagnosis.
    Guo P; Zhu B; Niu H; Wang Z; Liang Y; Chen Y; Zhang L; Ni H; Guo Y; Hay EHA; Gao X; Gao H; Wu X; Xu L; Li J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 29298666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cognitive Diagnostic Models for Random Guessing Behaviors.
    Hsu CL; Jin KY; Chiu MM
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():570365. PubMed ID: 33101139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modelling multiple problem-solving strategies and strategy shift in cognitive diagnosis for growth.
    Liao M; Jiao H
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Feb; 76(1):20-51. PubMed ID: 35810361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.