These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34149502)

  • 21. Sexual Disgust Trumps Pathogen Disgust in Predicting Voter Behavior During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Billingsley J; Lieberman D; Tybur JM
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918764170. PubMed ID: 29911419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Group's Vulnerability to Disaster: Basic Assumption and Work Group Mentalities Underlying Trump's 2016 Election.
    Chrzanowski CS
    Int J Psychoanal; 2019 Aug; 100(4):711-731. PubMed ID: 33952144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Examining long-term trends in politics and culture through language of political leaders and cultural institutions.
    Jordan KN; Sterling J; Pennebaker JW; Boyd RL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Feb; 116(9):3476-3481. PubMed ID: 30808741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Adverse Infant Health Outcomes Increased After the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election Among Non-White U.S.-born and Foreign-born Mothers.
    Langer PD; Patler C; Hamilton ER
    Demography; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39049503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Trump's electoral speeches and his appeal to the American white working class.
    Lamont M; Park BY; Ayala-Hurtado E
    Br J Sociol; 2017 Nov; 68 Suppl 1():S153-S180. PubMed ID: 29114866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. When do people prefer dominant over prestigious political leaders?
    Jiménez ÁV; Flitton A; Mesoudi A
    Evol Hum Sci; 2021; 3():e16. PubMed ID: 37588522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. They Saw a Debate: Political Polarization Is Associated with Greater Multivariate Neural Synchrony When Viewing the Opposing Candidate Speak.
    Broom TW; Stahl JL; Ping EEC; Wagner DD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Dec; 35(1):60-73. PubMed ID: 35802592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dimensions of pathological narcissism and intention to vote for Donald Trump.
    Yalch MM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249892. PubMed ID: 33857206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail: What the Election Means for U.S. Health Care, and the Health of American Democracy.
    Doherty RB
    Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc; 2017; 128():258-271. PubMed ID: 28790510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. U.S. Foreign Policy on the Verge of a New Path.
    Prikhodko OV
    Her Russ Acad Sci; 2021; 91(6):667-676. PubMed ID: 35125840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The rise in extreme mental distress among LGBT people during Trump's rise and presidency.
    Kuroki M
    Econ Hum Biol; 2021 Dec; 43():101034. PubMed ID: 34198029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diverging Life Expectancies and Voting Patterns in the 2016 US Presidential Election.
    Bor J
    Am J Public Health; 2017 Oct; 107(10):1560-1562. PubMed ID: 28817322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Motivated reasoning: Election integrity beliefs, outcome acceptance, and polarization before, during, and after the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Vail KE; Harvell-Bowman L; Lockett M; Pyszczynski T; Gilmore G
    Motiv Emot; 2023; 47(2):177-192. PubMed ID: 36188156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Should Biden Apologize for Trump? National Remorse and the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Smith N
    Society; 2020; 57(6):698-703. PubMed ID: 33424058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ethics Versus Success? The Acceptance of Unethical Leadership in the 2016 US Presidential Elections.
    Morais C; Abrams D; Randsley de Moura G
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():3089. PubMed ID: 32038430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. No evidence for systematic voter fraud: A guide to statistical claims about the 2020 election.
    Eggers AC; Garro H; Grimmer J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Nov; 118(45):. PubMed ID: 34728563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Elite rhetoric can undermine democratic norms.
    Clayton K; Davis NT; Nyhan B; Porter E; Ryan TJ; Wood TJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jun; 118(23):. PubMed ID: 34078668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Changes in subjective well-being following the U.S. Presidential election of 2016.
    Lench HC; Levine LJ; Perez KA; Carpenter ZK; Carlson SJ; Tibbett T
    Emotion; 2019 Feb; 19(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 29494200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Connections between viewing media about President Trump's dietary habits and fast food consumption intentions: Political differences and implications for public health.
    Myrick JG
    Appetite; 2020 Apr; 147():104545. PubMed ID: 31794820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Young adults' psychological and physiological reactions to the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Hoyt LT; Zeiders KH; Chaku N; Toomey RB; Nair RL
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2018 Jun; 92():162-169. PubMed ID: 29606376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.