These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34149573)

  • 1. Modeling Wording Effects Does Not Help in Recovering Uncontaminated Person Scores: A Systematic Evaluation With Random Intercept Item Factor Analysis.
    Nieto MD; Garrido LE; Martínez-Molina A; Abad FJ
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():685326. PubMed ID: 34149573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using Constrained Factor Mixture Analysis to Validate Mixed-Worded Psychological Scales: The Case of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in the Dominican Republic.
    García-Batista ZE; Guerra-Peña K; Garrido LE; Cantisano-Guzmán LM; Moretti L; Cano-Vindel A; Arias VB; Medrano LA
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():636693. PubMed ID: 34489774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Item Response Theory Models for Wording Effects in Mixed-Format Scales.
    Wang WC; Chen HF; Jin KY
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Feb; 75(1):157-178. PubMed ID: 29795817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dimensionality assessment in the presence of wording effects: A network psychometric and factorial approach.
    Garcia-Pardina A; Abad FJ; Christensen AP; Golino H; Garrido LE
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38379114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wording Effects in Assessment: Missing the Trees for the Forest.
    Ponce FP; Irribarra DT; Vergés A; Arias VB
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(5):718-734. PubMed ID: 34048313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How Does the Valence of Wording Affect Features of a Scale? The Method Effects in the Undergraduate Learning Burnout Scale.
    Zeng B; Wen H; Zhang J
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():585179. PubMed ID: 33117248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Influence of Item Characteristics on Acquiescence among Latino Survey Respondents.
    Davis RE; Lee S; Johnson TP; Conrad F; Resnicow K; Thrasher JF; Mesa A; Peterson KE
    Field methods; 2020 Feb; 32(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 34135694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response tendencies due to item wording using eye-tracking methodology accounting for individual differences and item characteristics.
    Koutsogiorgi CC; Michaelides MP
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Oct; 54(5):2252-2270. PubMed ID: 35032021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Examination of the Spanish Translation of the 50-item International Personality Item Pool Big-five Inventory in a Spanish Speaking Peruvian Sample.
    Hughes DJ; de Olazabal DP; Kratsiotis IK; Twumasi R; Booth T
    Span J Psychol; 2020 Jun; 23():e18. PubMed ID: 32618534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of classical and modern methods for measuring and correcting for acquiescence.
    Primi R; Santos D; De Fruyt F; John OP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):447-465. PubMed ID: 31032894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining the Effect of Reverse Worded Items on the Factor Structure of the Need for Cognition Scale.
    Zhang X; Noor R; Savalei V
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157795. PubMed ID: 27305001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reversed item bias: an integrative model.
    Weijters B; Baumgartner H; Schillewaert N
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Sep; 18(3):320-34. PubMed ID: 23646990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. HOMOGENEOUS DIMENSIONS OF PERSONALITY SCALE CONTENT.
    Jackson DN; Lay CH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1968 Jul; 3(3):321-37. PubMed ID: 26771286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Method Effects on an Adaptation of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in Greek and the Role of Personality Traits.
    Michaelides MP; Koutsogiorgi C; Panayiotou G
    J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(2):178-88. PubMed ID: 26528728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direction of wording and responses to items in oral health-related quality of life questionnaires for children and their parents.
    Locker D; Jokovic A; Allison P
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 35(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 17615012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Method effects associated with negatively and positively worded items on the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): results from a cross-sectional survey with a representative sample of Catalonian workers.
    Rodrigo MF; Molina JG; Losilla JM; Vives J; Tomás JM
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e031859. PubMed ID: 31784441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Impact of Item Feature and Response Preference in a Mixed-Format Design.
    Chen HF; Jin KY
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(2-3):208-222. PubMed ID: 33001710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Study of Reverse-Worded Matched Item Pairs Using the Generalized Partial Credit and Nominal Response Models.
    Matlock KL; Turner RC; Gitchel WD
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Feb; 78(1):103-127. PubMed ID: 29795949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wording effects and the factor structure of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12).
    Molina JG; Rodrigo MF; Losilla JM; Vives J
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):1031-7. PubMed ID: 24708077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles.
    Marsh HW; Scalas LF; Nagengast B
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Jun; 22(2):366-81. PubMed ID: 20528064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.