These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34149806)

  • 1. Genomic Prediction of Average Daily Gain, Back-Fat Thickness, and Loin Muscle Depth Using Different Genomic Tools in Canadian Swine Populations.
    Salek Ardestani S; Jafarikia M; Sargolzaei M; Sullivan B; Miar Y
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():665344. PubMed ID: 34149806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of genomic predictions for carcass and reproduction traits in Berkshire, Duroc and Yorkshire populations in Korea.
    Iqbal A; Choi TJ; Kim YS; Lee YM; Zahangir Alam M; Jung JH; Choe HS; Kim JJ
    Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2019 Nov; 32(11):1657-1663. PubMed ID: 31480201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic evaluation of feed efficiency component traits in Duroc pigs using 80K, 650K and whole-genome sequence variants.
    Zhang C; Kemp RA; Stothard P; Wang Z; Boddicker N; Krivushin K; Dekkers J; Plastow G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Apr; 50(1):14. PubMed ID: 29625549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single-step genomic evaluation with metafounders for feed conversion ratio and average daily gain in Danish Landrace and Yorkshire pigs.
    Fu C; Ostersen T; Christensen OF; Xiang T
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Oct; 53(1):79. PubMed ID: 34620083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Haplotype genomic prediction of phenotypic values based on chromosome distance and gene boundaries using low-coverage sequencing in Duroc pigs.
    Bian C; Prakapenka D; Tan C; Yang R; Zhu D; Guo X; Liu D; Cai G; Li Y; Liang Z; Wu Z; Da Y; Hu X
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Oct; 53(1):78. PubMed ID: 34620094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using Different Single-Step Strategies to Improve the Efficiency of Genomic Prediction on Body Measurement Traits in Pig.
    Song H; Zhang J; Zhang Q; Ding X
    Front Genet; 2018; 9():730. PubMed ID: 30693018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increased Accuracy of Genomic Prediction Using Preselected SNPs from GWAS with Imputed Whole-Genome Sequence Data in Pigs.
    Liu Y; Zhang Y; Zhou F; Yao Z; Zhan Y; Fan Z; Meng X; Zhang Z; Liu L; Yang J; Wu Z; Cai G; Zheng E
    Animals (Basel); 2023 Dec; 13(24):. PubMed ID: 38136908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maternal effects on traits measured during postweaning performance test of swine from four breeds.
    Johnson ZB; Chewning JJ; Nugent RA
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Jun; 80(6):1470-7. PubMed ID: 12078726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.
    Fangmann A; Sharifi RA; Heinkel J; Danowski K; Schrade H; Erbe M; Simianer H
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1434-1443. PubMed ID: 28464085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic diversity, extent of linkage disequilibrium and persistence of gametic phase in Canadian pigs.
    Grossi DA; Jafarikia M; Brito LF; Buzanskas ME; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):6. PubMed ID: 28109261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving genetic evaluation of litter size and piglet mortality for both genotyped and nongenotyped individuals using a single-step method.
    Guo X; Christensen OF; Ostersen T; Wang Y; Lund MS; Su G
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Feb; 93(2):503-12. PubMed ID: 25549983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Single-Step Genomic Evaluation for Meat Quality Traits, Sensory Characteristics, and Fatty-Acid Composition in Duroc Pigs.
    Lopez BI; Santiago KG; Lee D; Cho Y; Lim D; Seo K
    Genes (Basel); 2020 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 32916909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic Analysis of Major Production and Reproduction Traits of Korean Duroc, Landrace and Yorkshire Pigs.
    Alam M; Chang HK; Lee SS; Choi TJ
    Animals (Basel); 2021 May; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 34063090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of alternative approaches to single-trait genomic prediction using genotyped and non-genotyped Hanwoo beef cattle.
    Lee J; Cheng H; Garrick D; Golden B; Dekkers J; Park K; Lee D; Fernando R
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):2. PubMed ID: 28093065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Connectedness rating among commercial pig breeding herds in Korea.
    Lee W; Jung J; Oh SH
    J Anim Sci Technol; 2024 Mar; 66(2):366-373. PubMed ID: 38628682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Joint analysis of longitudinal feed intake and single recorded production traits in pigs using a novel Horizontal model.
    Shirali M; Strathe AB; Mark T; Nielsen B; Jensen J
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Mar; 95(3):1050-1062. PubMed ID: 28380533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integrating large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies improve the genomic prediction accuracy for combined pig populations.
    Cai X; Zhang W; Gao N; Wei C; Wu X; Si J; Gao Y; Li J; Yin T; Zhang Z
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39215551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic Prediction of Growth Traits in Yorkshire Pigs of Different Reference Group Sizes Using Different Estimated Breeding Value Models.
    Yin C; Shi H; Zhou P; Wang Y; Tao X; Yin Z; Zhang X; Liu Y
    Animals (Basel); 2024 Apr; 14(7):. PubMed ID: 38612337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of Genomic Prediction for Milk Production Traits in Philippine Dairy Buffaloes.
    Herrera JRV; Flores EB; Duijvesteijn N; Moghaddar N; van der Werf JH
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():682576. PubMed ID: 34777455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracies of genomic prediction of feed efficiency traits using different prediction and validation methods in an experimental Nelore cattle population.
    Silva RM; Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Magalhães AF; Irano N; Carvalheiro R; Canesin RC; Mercadante ME; Boligon AA; Baldi FS; Misztal I; Albuquerque LG
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Sep; 94(9):3613-3623. PubMed ID: 27898889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.