These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34150287)
1. Comparing the performance of the conventional and fixed-bed membrane bioreactors for treating municipal wastewater. Khastoo H; Hassani AH; Mafigholami R; Mahmoudkhani R J Environ Health Sci Eng; 2021 Jun; 19(1):997-1004. PubMed ID: 34150287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study on performance of the conventional and fixed-bed membrane bioreactors for treatment of Naproxen from pharmaceutical wastewater. Mokhtariazar A; Hassani AH; Borghei M; Massoudinejad M Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):9944. PubMed ID: 38688946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study on treatment performance, membrane fouling, and microbial community profile between conventional and hybrid sequencing batch membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. da Costa RE; Lobo-Recio MA; Battistelli AA; Bassin JP; Belli TJ; Lapolli FR Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Nov; 25(32):32767-32782. PubMed ID: 30251038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between a fixed bed hybrid membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment: a pilot-scale study. Rodríguez-Hernández L; Esteban-García AL; Tejero I Bioresour Technol; 2014; 152():212-9. PubMed ID: 24291797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enhanced membrane fouling control through self-forming dynamic membrane and sponge-wrapped membrane: A novel membrane bioreactor. Nagalakshmi S; Mohan SM Water Environ Res; 2023 Apr; 95(4):e10861. PubMed ID: 37041739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impacts of bio-carriers on the characteristics of soluble microbial products in a hybrid membrane bioreactor for treating mariculture wastewater. Zhu J; You H; Li Z; Ding Y; Liu F; Zhang C; Wang S; Gu Y; Chen F; Ma B Sci Total Environ; 2020 Oct; 737():140287. PubMed ID: 32783864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the performance and microbial community of hybrid moving bed and conventional membrane bioreactors treating municipal wastewater. Costa RE; Battistelli AA; Bernardelli JKB; Bassin JP; Belli TJ; Lapolli FR Environ Technol; 2019 Feb; 40(6):716-729. PubMed ID: 29130402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of micropollutant removal and fouling reduction in a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor system. Luo Y; Jiang Q; Ngo HH; Nghiem LD; Hai FI; Price WE; Wang J; Guo W Bioresour Technol; 2015 Sep; 191():355-9. PubMed ID: 26031758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fe(II)-dosed ceramic membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment: Nutrient removal, microbial community and membrane fouling analysis. Ren B; Li C; Zhang X; Zhang Z Sci Total Environ; 2019 May; 664():116-126. PubMed ID: 30739846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Newly Designed Hydrolysis Acidification Flat-Sheet Ceramic Membrane Bioreactor for Treating High-Strength Dyeing Wastewater. Jin Y; Wang D; Zhang W Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Mar; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 30836624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of organic loading rates on the performance of membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment behaviours, fouling, and economic cost. Al-Sayed A; Hassan GK; Al-Shemy MT; El-Gohary FA Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):15601. PubMed ID: 37730796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of different configurations of hybrid membrane bioreactors for treatment of domestic wastewater. Cuevas-Rodríguez G; Cervantes-Avilés P; Torres-Chávez I; Bernal-Martínez A Water Sci Technol; 2015; 71(3):338-46. PubMed ID: 25714631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between a moving bed membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor on organic carbon and nitrogen removal. Yang S; Yang F; Fu Z; Lei R Bioresour Technol; 2009 Apr; 100(8):2369-74. PubMed ID: 19111458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanism of Membrane Fouling Control by HMBR: Effect of Microbial Community on EPS. Liu Q; Yao Y; Xu D Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(5):. PubMed ID: 32150812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wastewater treatment by microalgal membrane bioreactor: Evaluating the effect of organic loading rate and hydraulic residence time. Ashadullah AKM; Shafiquzzaman M; Haider H; Alresheedi M; Azam MS; Ghumman AR J Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 278(Pt 1):111548. PubMed ID: 33126200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Membrane fouling and performance evaluation of conventional membrane bioreactor (MBR), moving biofilm MBR and oxic/anoxic MBR. Khan SJ; Ahmad A; Nawaz MS; Hankins NP Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(7):1403-9. PubMed ID: 24718329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of solid retention time on the performance of submerged anoxic/oxic membrane bioreactor. Ng HY; Tan TW; Ong SL; Toh CA; Loo ZP Water Sci Technol; 2006; 53(6):7-13. PubMed ID: 16749433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomass characteristics of two types of submerged membrane bioreactors for nitrogen removal from wastewater. Liang Z; Das A; Beerman D; Hu Z Water Res; 2010 Jun; 44(11):3313-20. PubMed ID: 20371094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficiencies of O-MBR and A/O-MBR for Organic Matter Removal from and Trihalomethane Formation Potential Reduction in Domestic Wastewater. Sriboonnak S; Yanun A; Induvesa P; Pumas C; Duangjan K; Rakruam P; Nitayavardhana S; Sittisom P; Wongrueng A Membranes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 12(8):. PubMed ID: 36005676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review. Bal AS; Dhagat NN Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]